As FS will soon engage the Domain in negotiations, i want to highlight several points in advance, just as additional info for the upcoming situations during the negotiations.

First, there is the issue of credibility of the „Alien Interview“, to which i would like to add at least 2 points:

1. Airl states that he is an experienced pilot with many years of experience. He also claims that his craft got hit by lightning and subsequently crashed because of the strike. This seems to highly improbable, although not impossible. There must be Millions of Planets out there with thunderstorms, as we have in our solar system at least 2 planets where atmospheric lightning was observed. Therefore lightning-strikes should have been a known danger for Airl, and easily avoidable for an experienced pilot, if his craft was vulnerable to it. Would it not be possible to „harden“ the Domain`s crafts against lightning-strike in the course of Millions of years of technological advancements? Even our standardt „modern“ aircrafts are hardened.
2. We know from the GF-project that the GF is facing a growing, massive threat and that they consider „retreating/withdrawing/moving to another place“ because of that growing threat. How does that tally with the narrative that the Domain had decisively defeated the „Old Empire“ in this galaxy and is just conducting clean-up operations within the next few 1000`s years? Or is maybe the Domain the growing threat the GF is worried about?

There are even more questions arising from the „Interview“, also another quote which raised my eyebrows is this:
„ It is futile to resist The Domain“ ….this is coming from a race which is synthetic in 3D...

I think the situation makes the following imperative:

FS should first have a verification-procedure in place to confirm all the claims made in the „Interview“. Intelligent, clear and unmistakeable tasking is required:
The origins of the „Interview“ and its background should be RVed; the background of the Roswell-crash; Airl and his/her intention while sharing the information , the 3000 strong battalion and their demise and and the origin of the Vedas should be at least be RVed. Also interesting would be to RV a „Domain“-controlled soceity/planet and their actions and intentions there and here. All the data should be published before any meaningful contact and exchange is initiated. It should be clear without a doubt for everybody here on FS, with what kind of group FS is really dealing here.

When it has been firmly established that the „Interview“ is not a hoax and the Domain is exactly what Airl has claimed, then i would like to consider this:

Second, i guess that the bargain would go somewhere along these lines: „FS will help the Domain in finding the hidden equipment which maintain the deathtraps; the domain then deactivates the deathtraps; the Domain will then be able to reintegrate their 3000 members back into their society; in exchange the Domain will assist the GF in beating back the threat/attack by the Lizzies.“

I am not sure that the Domain would agree to that, the reason being the following:
One of the main goals of the Domain is the preservation of Earth, as reflected in this statement:

„Although The Domain has no interest in Earth, per se, or in the population
of IS-BEs on this planet, it does serve our interests to ensure that the resources of Earth
are not destroyed or spoiled. „

So, likely we will have this scenario:

...this and a maybe the vague promise to deactivate the deathtraps later....

I don`t know how the whole scenario will unfold, and i would appreciate some sort of mechanism within FS, where forum-members can have an interactive input into the process.
How about starting a Q and A here on the forum beforehand by Courtney or somebody else?
I know that is difficult as long as the RV verification process has not been completed, but it should be possible during the negotiating phase .

follow the golden path;

Is "The Domain" gonna be posted today ??

if you have seen the „Alien Interview“, and The Secret Apollo Moon Missions you might get a clue. in the Secret Apollo Moon Missions some colonizers travell in wormholes like airl told. And now Daz Smith has made this session, and it seems to me something is happening.

when he talks about seeing patterns its the same you see when you go into space, cause of radiation. i dont think they got the conclution right on this unfortunately. the star is a symbol of freedom for the jews who escaped the orions, thats why the chatolic church also think its the devils symbol.

Read Dianetics and the first volume in Scientology. Then check out tonyortega.org/2016/12/12/scientology-and-aliens... Then, ask yourself where was L.Ron Hubbard during the year (1947/48) before he wrote Dianetics? How could a third rate sci-fi pulp writer become the father of a new psychotherapy and subsequent religion based on becoming 'clear' of invading spirits. The basis for which is a human alien struggle 'similar' to that outlined in 'Alien Interview'. By the way, Mr Lawrence Spencer is and was a Scientologist during the 'editing' of 'Alien Interview'. I'm not saying that 'interview' might not be true. I'm only positing the question. Which came first, Dianetics or the interview? Answer that one and you'll have your proof. Or, at least as much as is possible I suppose.

This is for MB above. The comment I made above has a bad link. This is the proper link:
https://tonyortega.org/2016/12/12/scientology-and-aliens-what-did-l-ron-hubbard-actually-say-about-space-invaders/?/
Pay particular attention to the number of battalion members, where they were sent and what happened to them. Notice any similarities? The more you research Scientology, especially the advanced (and costly) OT levels the more you will run into parallels to 'Interview'. My belief is that 'Interview' was either spawned from Scientology or vice versa. There are far too many identical scenarios and phraseology between the two to be a mere coincidence. Of course I could be wrong.

Reply to Kent,
I'm afraid I am not aware of the protocol for any of the target packages. Which leaves me at a loss as far as commenting or suggesting. Apologies.

MB wrote, "i would appreciate some sort of mechanism within FS, where forum-members can have an interactive input into the process."

100% in agreement with this. Either forum members can be treated as simply spectators, or we can be included as participants in the process. Obviously, we're here for a reason. Hopefully, Courtney realizes that we're not members here, only to wait for and watch new releases, while mindlessly wolfing-down popcorn...

We want in.

I am not sure what farsight team try to negotiate?
Weapons cant delivered to Earth.
Neither those aliens would transfer any technology to us, because we are dumb and destroy with it ourselfs.
Getting acknowledged an getting the help how to leverage at the so called galactic federation, i would not bother with them.
Galactic federation did not helped us, they just postponed inevitable.
Maybe what they could provide just means of getting caches with valuable resource hidden on Earth, that would help the cause.

So no news updates, this so strange, maybe they got caught up with to much sensitive information, but why there no news about why the release postponed?
THIS IS SO STRANGE!

There 'is' a third rail that runs through this subject. That I can assure you of. Perhaps someone at Farsight touched it. Forbidden truths are meted out when they are supposed to be. Trying to jump the gun and things don't end well. I'm not saying anything like that has happened at Farsight. It just seems to be a statement that fits about this subject.

They’re usually late + the editor is injured. Let’s calm down. But would be nice if Aziz could post a quick update

Agreed.

Perhaps the bigger question, with regards to this topic, should be:

"Do we want Farsight representing us [as members, or humanity as a whole], without our input, in any negotiations, with the Domain, GF, or any other ET group?"

First of all, I don't think one person, such as Courtney, should represent us, without first making sure that a majority of us agree on the basis of what should be negotiated on [and at what cost], to begin with. Otherwise, it could easily turn out the same way that it did after the 1950's agreements, between the ETs and the POTUS [government]... or perhaps worse.

Next, watch this discussion with Courtney, hosted by Daz Smith [Courtney joins ~24:00 minute mark], and consider what some of his prominent motivations for Farsight actually are [mainly in answering the question posed to him at 56:18 by Mr Kaufman]:

When remote viewing becomes really big one day, there's going to be hundreds of millions of dollars of grant money that become available for RV, and all this money will have to go through Courtney/Farsight. So it's about money - or at least, that's a major component of his overall plan. Money & control. This should give you pause.

There's several other troubling things I learned in this interview, as well, such as how invested Courtney has become in some of the current viewers - helping them out financially due to life problems, buying them clothes, etc. When you take this into account, along with the decisions to part ways with quality viewers like Dick Algier and Daz Smith, one might further question Courtney's judgment.

Also, I think the idea of bringing a more theatrical or "dramatic" component to Farsight's RV projects, is a mistake. I don't want to see remote viewers dressed-up in costumes, "acting", or having the content dumbed-down to appeal to the drone-sitcom-watching masses. What I like about Aziz, is that his sessions are straight-forward and to the point. There's no theatrics, trying to become an integral part of the story (of what or who's being viewed), or dressing up in ridiculous costumes. All of that crap distracts from the data.

Anyway, after watching the Domain video, I don't think we should be negotiating with them in the first place. Certainly not without member input, and not without coming to a consensus on what the terms of any agreement should constitute. I would say that the same should hold true with the GF, or any other ET group. If not, don't bother negotiating on my behalf......

FARSIGHT cannot negotiate with the domain or any other species or et civilisation on behalf of the human beings who are trapped on Earth, why because there not in charge of the Earth or it’s population, they mean well but in truth have no influence or control over what happens to earth or it’s population. As information gatherers there invaluable to help there fellow humans to remember who they are, the fact is we have to help ourselves no one else will. As a civilisation we have very little to offer an advanced civilisation in terms of help or resources. So since FARSIGHT has nothing to offer in terms of negotiations they cannot negotiate on behalf of the people of Earth.