In the context of Farsight, will Trump be supportive of Disclosure? He was on Joe Rogan recently and mentioned his intention to release (most of) the JFK files, which was highlighted by Harvey. But what about 9/11?

I believe RFK Jr will press Trump on the JFK files. That's a very important issue to him, but I also believe RFK Jr is keen on the other issues of 9/11 and Disclosure.

I understand there is a hearing on Disclosure set in Congress for November 13th. According to George Knapp & Jeremy Corbell on "WEAPONIZED" (YouTube), this hearing is supposed to be very significant.

Frankly, I'm puzzled by the situation. Weren't there Farsight predictions of chaos after the election? Should we be preparing ourselves?

National Issues: There are calls for mass civil action to address illegal immigration, gang activity, and other related problems. There's also the ongoing conversation about building the wall and what its broader implications might be.

International Issues: Trump has voiced strong support for Israel, while also stating that he intends to end the Ukraine conflict. Iran. Russia.

I’m particularly puzzled by Harvey's assertion that releasing information about JFK and 9/11 is a necessary prerequisite for Catastrophic Disclosure.

What’s the urgency here? And why is Catastrophic Disclosure said to be so critical at this moment, and the consequences if it doesn’t happen "now" then all is lost?

It’s further frustrating because most of Farsight's audience is intelligent and looking for concrete details—things we can evaluate, watch for, and consider. I'm trying to piece together what’s really going on from these episodes, but I still feel like I'm missing key insights.

Anyone have something useful to add here?

I believe the chaos the farsight team got was in either December or January. You make some good points. I can see releasing the jfk files because it shows the corruption of the government. The same could be said with 9/11. If disclosure doesn’t happen soon, one will question Harvey’s motives or Harvey all together. Seeding is believing, it is a weird plan waiting for chaos. I would like to think that preventing WW3 and get the masses to plead there case to galactic federation might be a better approach. I find it odd that a Harvey doesn’t comment much on politics.

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

As for the JFK files, in the interview with Joe Rogan, Trump specifically mentions the JFK files and being asked *not* to release the information. He mentioned leafing through some if, that he would release some/most of it -- with some concern over individuals who are still living.

"It’s further frustrating because most of Farsight's audience is intelligent and looking for concrete details—things we can evaluate, watch for, and consider. I'm trying to piece together what’s really going on from these episodes, but I still feel like I'm missing key insights."
you are as everybody else... but to talk about all the complexity on the political and social agenda in less than one hour i believe it is not possible!
Nevertheless, preparedness and delving into our highest self is key important.

I believe the interviews with Harvey and the Board Meetings may have mentioned the fact that time is not the same "out there" as we experience it here. The recent interview with Harvey was more about how we need to get out of this situation (we KNOW that now). I am becoming disappointed at what I feel is missing details, specificity -- the emotional element is useful, to a point, but most of us want answers; we need details that we can digest mentally and make sense of.

Harvey says that both sides know each other's moves, so they are clearly dealing with time in a way that is foreign to us. Plus we are missing some our abilities. If there's a reason those details are missing, they've not said.

The idea of our being in a prison is not isolated to Farsight, the narrative has been present in history, and I've met other people who have "heard of it" but not through Farsight. It's become such an important matter for me personally, but the scant detail is frustrating me.

I will need to review the videos -- it could be that December and January (my birthday!) are targets for chaos. I have plenty of popcorn here, but I may stock up! :)

So, if government doesn't help with disclosure, who will? There are essentially two possibilities:

1. It's all a scam and nobody will help. The supposedly good ETs aren't good at all and belong to the current powers that be. The question becomes: Why are they talking about disclosure at all? Why would they create a demand that doesn't serve them?

2. There is at least one group that is in opposition to the current powers that be. At this point, it's not important wether they are good or bad, all that matters is that they are in opposition for whatever reason. So there's a conflict, and that obviously includes infiltration of the existing power structures in order to disrupt them. The question becomes: How does disclosure serve them?

This is where it gets interesting, because you can conclude from the fact that they are fueling a demand for disclosure that it must serve them somehow. So, if they are bad people who just want to acquire the prison planet for their own benefit, how would disclosure serve them? What would be their goal?

On the other hand, if they are good people who really want to free the planet, the most interesting question is: When did the infiltration begin? For example, if they were around when JFK was assassinated, they could have ensured that the evidence hasn't been destroyed, and the enemy doesn't even know. Never heard of double agents and sleepers?

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

I still use that line whenever I think people have an aversion to my conspiracy theory mind. I just answer whatever question with the gay frogs

"how would YOU go about dealing with the «mind-control» phenomena that causes them to believe just about every single «lie» that comes out of anything and everything «main-stream» ?"

I would ask many questions. 😉