This is the Transcript for the December 2021, Farsight Intelligence Briefing - Coerced Consent and the False Flag.

The complete video by Farsight – Courtney Brown, can be found in the BROWSE section of Farsight Prime:
https://www.farsightprime.com/farsight-intelligence-briefing/season:2/videos/intelligence-briefing-december-2021

Premiered: 5th 6th DECEMBER 2021
Description: Coerced Consent and the False Flag explains how free beings are trapped and coerced into surrendering their rights on this planet, and in this universe. It has happened many times in the past, and it is guaranteed to happen again in the future. No one is safe unless they understand the way this works.

Add your thoughts and comments on the briefing.
Please post also if any corrections are needed to the transcript.
Enjoy.

I have tried to list the topics discussed in the Intelligence Briefing under titles - the headings are not part of Courtney’s narrative – I have added them to help to find areas of content. You may need to also read the prior and the following titles to find all the relevant information.

List of Topics

Introduction – Courtney Brown
Free Will – Vibrations – Interactions – Quantum
Wave Function
Super Position
Vibrational Compatibility
Beat Frequencies
Matching Vibrations
Matching Vibrations – Free Will & Susceptibility
Matching Vibrations – Sharks
Free Will & Consent
Consent – Obtaining
Consent – Surrendering
Consent - Open Agreements
Coercion & Consent - Open Coercion
Coercion & Consent – Bribes
Coercion & Consent – Reward
Intervention - The Galactic Federation of Worlds
Intervention - The History of Germany
Intervention – For Better For Worse
Intervention - Prevention
Intervention – Violation - Considerations & Complications
Intervention – Politics
Roosevelt & the Pacific Event
Roosevelt - Part 1: Hail to The Chief | Those Who Shaped the 20th Century, Ep. 10
Roosevelt - Part 2: Manipulator-In-Chief | Those Who Shaped the 20th Century, Ep. 11
The Event - Pearl Harbour
The Event – 911
The Event Purpose – Demolition & Invasion - Iraq & Afghanistan
The Event Purpose – The Pentagon
Consent by Coercion – Weapons of Mass Destruction
Extra-terrestrial - Invasion or Intervention
Coerced Consent – Vietnam War
Coerced Consent – Antarctica’s Operation Highjump
Coerced Consent – Null & Void
Coercion – Current Events
Coercion - Lockdown
Coercion – Mandatory
Coercion – The Upcoming False Flag Event
Coercion – Free Will Universe
False Flag - Coercing Consent
Consent - If you want a better world, insist on the better world

INTRODUCTION – Courtney Brown
December 2021 Intelligence Briefing

Today’s Intelligence Briefing is really, important. You have to understand it, its really important for your freedom if you are to understand this. Now, this title for this topic is called – Coerced Consent and the False Flag. It affects everybody. Now, I’m going to be talking about some of the major events that are going to be involved with this idea of Coerced Consent. However, it affects everybody on every level and I’m going to be touching all of those.

Free Will – Vibrations – Interactions - quantum
Let me explain that this is a Free Will universe. Free Will does exist. It actually happens - you have the free will however, there’s two of them that interact together, and the free will that you have interacts with the idea of vibration, that we call vibration.

Now there’s a difference between freewill and vibration – let me explain that. Vibration is determined by what you think and how you feel. Physicist have long understood that nothing really happens on the quantum level unless its registered or observed in some way. As Einstein said, ‘Does this mean the moon would not exist if nobody observed it? But in a sense, it does mean that. You see in a sense; you see on the quantum level; individual particles don’t actually register in our reality unless something actually happens to interact with them. And we are all composed of individual particles, so the big macro must be dependent upon the micro.
So, what we have is an understanding that somehow, in some way, shape, or form, observation or interactions registering in some way – it can be through a machine, or it can be through personal observation or whatever - somehow has an effect on whether things manifest in our reality.

Wave Function
So, the idea of free will and vibration interact because the vibration is the frequencies that compose the macro reality that we have – what we are looking at – us right now, - we all have what the physicists would call a wave function. A particle has a wave function, a molecule has a wave function, a house has a wave function, you and I have wave functions, the planet has a wave function, in fact, the Universe has a wave function.

Super Position
So, there is such a thing as a group of frequencies that combine and interact in such a way that they create something that physicists call a Super Position. And that’s when the particles manifest in our realty the way we see it. So now, they’ve done lots of experiments on the science of this line, so this is not in dispute. The interpretation of Quantum mechanics isn’t in dispute, but the reality is that Quantum mechanics in the macro world are linked in some way that many modern-day physicists do not fully understand. And they often say, these physicists – it’s usually the older generation physicists – they say that ‘what happens in the quantum realm is like what happens in Vegas – it stays in Vegas’. ‘And what happens in the macro realm stays in the macro world’, and there’s a line between them. That’s so stupid. The younger physicists don’t often think that. The younger physicists understand that what happens in the micro realm must be what happens in the macro realm. Basically, they are waiting for generational replacement to allow these newer ideas to sift through.

But it means something to you. It means something really important to you, because it means that your vibrations, your observations, your way of thinking, your way of feeling, actually makes a difference in what you experience, in what manifests in the reality that you’re living in.

Vibrational Compatibility
So, free will is one thing, vibration is another. But you see, by vibrating in a certain way, by having a certain tenure to your feelings and your thoughts, what happens is that you become compatible with vibrationally everything else vibrates in some other wat. So you cannot actually interact with someone if the vibration for that other person is very different from you – it’s like oil and water, it doesn’t mix. These are very difficult ideas for physicists to work their heads around, but none the less, it actually works on a mathematical level, on a physics level. What we have is thing have to be in a state of super position and that means the frequencies have to be somewhat comparable for them to interact in some way.

Beat Frequencies
Let me give you an example, and I will show you why this matters for your future.
Let’s just say you pick the middle key on a piano, and you hit the C, and then you hit the C sharp, or maybe just the B right below it, OK. And what you hear is something called the Beat Frequency between the 2 frequencies. Say hit the C and the C sharp at the same time and what you hear is a wha wha wha as the 2 frequencies interact – you see the 2 frequencies, the C & the C sharp are interacting, and producing the what’s called the Beat Frequency. But now if you take the middle C and you hit the highest C sharp or the B on the piano keyboard, you hardly hear any beat or interaction – there is one but it hardly one to notice, it just basically is insignificant, there’s no real interaction between middle C and the highest B. The frequencies are just too far apart. So, frequencies have to be somewhat in the same neighbourhood for the interaction to actually occur.

So, that is why on the level of physics that if you have a predator and a prey on some level they have to interact. That means that emotions and thought s and feeling of the predator and the prey are somehow compatible. That is why fear is compatible with anger. The vibration of both are somewhat comparable.

So free will in one sense independent upon the vibration of what you’re allowing yourself to interact with. This somehow connects also with this so-called law of attraction. But the basic idea is that free will and vibration go hand in hand. You can’t think of one without the other.

Matching Vibrations
So, if one is in a certain vibration, you’re exposing yourself to everything in that vibration. That’s what we are in volved with right now on the planet earth. So, if you can interact because of a certain level of vibration, anything that happens at that certain level of vibration, you’re essentially susceptible to that.

Matching Vibrations – Free Will & Susceptibility
Now the real question is what is free will in that context of you being susceptible to anything that happens.
So, if something really bad is going on in the world, by your own vibration are you compatible with that?
Now, were going to extend that to the extra-terrestrial realm.
Let us say we have been talking a lot on Farsight on the GALACTIC FEDERATION OF WORLDS. So, let us say that the GALACTIC FEDERATION OF WORLDS says they’re going to intervene in some way. Now if they’re going to intervene in some way, what is the decision for if they’re going to intervene or not? What is the decision if they’re going to say, ‘this is worth an intervention or not’? First of all, they have to say, ‘we are dealing with something what everybody in that thing is of the same vibration’. So automatically you’d think everybody that’s experiencing that, is in the same ocean, in the same pool. So, in one sense the vibrations are sort of choosing to be in that setting.

Continued...

Matching Vibrations - Sharks
For example, if I go to the beach and jump into the water and I see a shark. Am I supposed to get upset for the shark? Heck, I knew that in the water there are sharks. Should someone be saving me for going swimming at the beach when in fact I knew I was going someplace where there are sharks. So, if you’re talking about something that the GALACTIC FEDERATION OF WORLDS has to intervene with they have to come up with a decision about saying ‘Is it something that’s worthwhile for them to interact’. Now you can’t really say the following…
Now if those people knew what was really happening then they would want our help, so we should intervene, we should invade. You can’t say that. Because there are so many things that people do and get some to themselves that are not really things that they really want to happen but, they those things happen within that the context of that particular vibration.

Free Will & Consent
Now I’m going to be commencing this to all sorts of things including the whole debate on the vaccine, wars, the whole debate on reptilians, on what’s going to be happening with the so-called false flag and let me tell you there is going to be a false flag you need to understand. I’m going to be connecting it to what happened to 911. I’m going to be connecting it to the history with what happened to Germany the Franco-German war. I’m going to be comparing it and connecting it to Operation Highjump, I’m going to be comparing it to the situation with reptilians right here on this planet right now, and I’m going to show you the ways in which free will can be twisted and turned such that people actually give their consent. Their free will consent to be enslaved. To be captured. To be trapped. I’m going to go through all of that and I’m going to do it starting right now. So let’s get into the details.

Let’s talk about how this idea of free will can happen unconsciously, according to the idea of physics, you have to be in a similar vibration in order to interact with something. Now, this may seem sort of difficult to understand but on the level of physics it makes sense. Do you have to consciously say ‘I’m choosing something by free will’. What if you were Jewish, before WWII before the Holocaust and you are in Europe and you have a Jewish friend, and you say ‘I’m going to immigrate to the United States, and you leave Europe. You just somehow situation friendships connections whatever you decide to leave Europe and you end up in the United States. And you become one of the Jewish refugees who ended up in the United States. Einstein was such a person. He left before the holocaust and ended up in the United States and ended up the famous Einstein of course. There are a lot of people like that.

What about the Jewish friends that the person had, and that person that said, ‘No, I think I’m going to hang around. It’s not going to get too bad – it will be alright’. What was going on psychologically, subconsciously. As we understand we do not live as isolated human beings. As you see with remote viewing, we are more than physical bodies. Physical bodies are just like a car. They get worn out, you discard them, whatever. The point is the physical bodies are not the actual you. And the actual you really does extend across time and space, otherwise Remote Viewing couldn’t even work. So, what happens is on some level the Jewish individual decided he’s going to leave Europe and ends up in the United States before the Holocaust, is vibrationally a little different from the Jewish individual who ends up staying in Germany and experiencing the holocaust, going to the death camps, going through the torture, the kidnapping, the gas chambers, the whole thing. That experience actually happens to the second person, but it doesn’t happen to the first.

So, how did free will come into this? Was it conscious? Did the person who immigrated to the US consciously said ‘no, there’s going to be something called the holocaust. I’m going to get out of here while the getting out is good’. The person didn’t do that on a subconscious level, they just knew - It’s like oil and water just separating. And according to the idea of physics, it’s the; thinking about this, it’s the feeling about this, that lets those experiencing sort of separate out. OK.

Now you can think of it in terms of someone’s who is a victim – thinking of going out at night and going to some club down the street, or whatever, and someone says ‘sure, I’m going to do that’ and they just go out there and they walk out there, and they walk down the street, and they get robbed, and beaten or whatever. Versus another person who says’ hmmm, I just don’t think tonight’s a good night, I don’t know why, I just feel funny about that. I think I’m going to stay inside and read a book. What was the difference between the two – in a sense there was Free Will, but did it have to be conscious free will or can it be vibrational free will. Can it be an understanding of what the future is in the 2 different timelines could be. And when one chooses one path versus another path. Another way to look at it is that your going down the street and you see a fork in the road and you have a choice between going down path A and path B. now one of the things that we do with RV is to RV down path A and path B – meaning we find in the future what happens in path A and path B and bring both pieces of information back and thus we then have information that allows us to decide what is better – meaning; do we like it when we are down path A better than when wea re down path B – meaning the past the present and the future all happens simultaneously.

So we are actually remote viewing ourselves right now in path A, and ourselves right now in path B, and they’re different. And were saying I’m happier down path A than path B, so we’re consciously making the decision to go down path A – that’s a way of consciously using free will but, in the absence of remote viewing, you just have to go with your feelings – ‘Hmmm, I sort of sense that this is going to be better than that’. But that in a sense is a decision made with free will based on the idea of the vibration that you have, and the vibration helps you separate out which particular pathway you desire.

Consent - Obtaining
Now let me tell you how consent actually happens. If you have free will and that means you have to have consent, so who does consent actually happen. On one level consent happens by you aligning yourself vibrationally with different timelines. And deciding which timeline feels better, and then doing that. That’s an act of Free Will. However, its also possible for others to manipulate you to trap you to capture you to force you to do one thing that you otherwise wouldn’t have done. And for you then to give your consent, often consciously, for the abuse that you’ll go through. So, how can this happen – free will? It can happen by surrender.

Consent - Surrendering
For example, at the end of WWII the Japanese surrendered to the Allied Forces and that was the end of the Pacific part of WWII. Now the Japanese didn’t want to surrender, they didn’t consciously say ‘oh its going to be so great to be surrendering, and when we surrender our economy is going to be really grow, we’re going to have Sony, we’re going to have all these different companies out there doing interesting things – let us surrender – this is going to be so great’. That isn’t what happened. They were defeated in WWII, and they felt terrible about the whole thing. It was a major, major, collapse of the entire Japanese Empire. So, it was surrender but what kind of surrender? Did they do it of free will? They did do it of free will but its not because they said ‘which is what we want to choose – like options and you’re choosing – they did it because they were cohersed. The Allied forces had already dropped 2 atomic bombs on Japan, they had already pushed the Japanese military Navy back to the shores of Japan – with – islands, pushing them back. So the Japanese surrendered but it was not like an act of happiness, they had to surrender because they had no choice, they were coerced into that. At least they felt they had no choice. Actually, they could have chosen not to surrender but then they would have experienced another atomic bomb explosion, they would have experienced an Allied invasion onto the lands of island of Japan, and they just decided with that threat, that they’re not going to do it. So, surrender is a version of giving ones consent. We are consenting to you taking over the country or giving up – ok.

Consent by Open Agreements
Because of that threat, surrender is one way. There can also be an open agreement. An open agreement was where people negotiate things and then they say OK we’re going to give our consent for this to happen because we negotiated it. For example there could be people saying ‘I want to burn coal’. Now there could be other people saying ‘well, we can’t have you burning coal because the carbon dioxide, when you burn coal, is heating up and making a the chemical composition of the atmosphere much very different and we are experience global warming. And so the person can say ‘well ok well I want to burn coal and if I cant burn coal what can we work out, how can we do it? And then the person can say ‘well OK, we can have a special job training program to get you instead of mining coal, we can have you manufacturing photocells, upgrade the technology of the place, education, technology of the place’ – you negotiate. So the idea of having an open agreement, one that everybody knows about, that’s another way that you can get free will. But its consent meaning you’re consenting, but otherwise the people would have said ‘no I just want to keep on mining this coal, that’s what I want to do’. So, you’re forcing them to do something else, and you’re doing it with an Open Agreement.

Continued...

Coercion & Consent - Open Coercion
There’s another way you can it that’s just plain Open Coercion. We’re going to be focusing on that a lot. The idea of forcing someone to do something, And if you’re doing something with coercion its often associated with a threat. How many times have you heard the story of a predator kidnapping a young child, a girl, and saying your going to allow me to do what I want to do with you or I’m going to do something terrible to your mother or father – I be killing your mother or father or something like that if you tell anybody about it I’ll come back and kill them, that type of a threat.
Well then, the person maybe petrified, that girl may be petrified and just sort of freeze and in a sense give her consent to the perpetrator, the rapist, to do whatever he wants. So that’s giving consent, but it’s under extreme coercion, and that type of event is none the less a free will decision but it’s a free will decision of terror. And many would say, no its not free will in the context of coercion. But in reality, it is coercion is often done at the point of a gun or with a knife at ones throat. And the point is that person eventually makes a decision, to avoid the event of something terrible happening to them because of the threat that’s being made.

Now the real question that we have is what if the person never agrees ever - no matter what the threat is? What if the perpetrator says ‘you let me do what I want to do or I am going to kill your parent or do XYZ’ - terrible stuff. What if the person no matter what was said ‘No I’m not giving you my consent’.
There’s reason to suspect that there maybe a loophole in the absence of an agreement of some sort if unconsciously says I do not, I do not, I do not give one’s consent – fighting to the end. It’s possible, we don’t know the full parameters of this, but its possible that some other elements of physics involves itself such that, that level of free will can establish itself in some way shape or form. The person started screaming yelling the perp starts running off, whatever. But the point is, its possible and we don’t know how far this can go however we do know that in many cases the perpetrator often leaves threatens into giving their consent by threatening them very badly and we often know now that reptilians, Orion’s actually use this threat to others to participate in their own experiments, to run the stuff that goes on in the extra-terrestrial oppressive side of it uses that type of coercion a lot. But there’s other ways to free will can be compromised by consent.

Coercion & Consent - Bribes
For example, there can be not just a threat, but there can be a bribe. Look, if you do this, I’m going to give you this payment under the table - a bribe. Or congress people, senators, and congressmen, how often do we hear about the money? People having the influence in the senate and the congress. Bribes. People contributing to their campaigns. Some people say that the most bought and sold institution on planet earth is the US congress where the money exchanges hands and people are just … (shakes head) it’s just not a fair and free situation especially in campaign situations now, where there are no limits on campaign contributions by any individual – people can just give money, money, money, so people who have no money are bribing the members of congress and they know if they don’t take that money and use that money to try and survive politically, then they will lose and they don’t want to loose.

Coercion & Consent - Reward
So, there’s also the possibility of not just to Bribe, but also Reward - ‘You help us now and in a few years down the line when you’re no longer in congress and your no longer as senator, you can work for us’.
Now that open-revolving-door type of situation often has limitations within bureaucratic laws and federal laws, but it often skirted, its often found to be escaping. There’s ways to get around it, and if you wait a few years you can actually end up doing that. And often it can happen that the government is at a loss that this type of revolving door type thing happened. There are so many instances who were law makers actually become employed in the industries who are giving them money long after they are law makers. This is a common thing – where someone, a congressman for example, will lose an election and then the president will appoint that congressman to a peace core director or an ambassador – they get a reward for that type of thing. So, in a sense they are giving their consent to do whatever the political leaders would want them to do in order to guarantee that they’ll have some type of job afterwards.

Continued...

Intervention - The Galactic Federation of Worlds
There’s a lot of different ways that consent can be given that is not what we normally think of it. Its normally something we think about as saying ‘well here I am just sitting around and I think this is a good idea, and I’m going to give my consent to do something like that; Let’s go the big question – the Galactic Federation of Worlds.

Now, we have been involved in a lot of discussions and projects talking about the Galactic Federation of Worlds. Now listen folks, just listen – put yourself in their place - inside the place of the mind of Galactic Federation of Worlds, where consent can be given through all types of means. At what point do you actually say, ‘I’m going to intervene we need the Galactic Federation of Worlds to intervene to save humanity XYZ’. At what point do you do that when in fact there’s been some level of consent for humanity being the ways its in – being the way they are, or being in a situation the way they are. They just can’t say ‘well I’m making the decision myself that if they really understood the situation, then they would want me to intervene’ because any predator would say that; ‘If the predator says well if that woman actually knew what a great guy I was, she’d want to be my girlfriend’ – so he’s going to go out there and rape her. He could say that. Of course, its not true! But the Galactic Federation of Worlds is saying, ‘at what point does it become a situation where we make that decision for that other group, for humanity’. ‘At what point do we intervene in everything with people disagreeing’.

Now, that’s the real question – Do we Intervene? So let me give you some examples to get you to the point of understanding how difficult a problem it is for the Galactic Federation of Worlds to intervene, to decide whether to intervene to help humanity.

Intervention - The History of Germany
Just listen to this – Lets go back in history for a little bit and I’m going to bring it all the way up to the current time, and even talk about the current vax debates, let’s talk about Germany and how it came to be. That’s right, Germany and how it came to be.
Back in the old days in the 1800s, Germany wasn’t Germany it was just a bunch of principalities and they spoke the German language, but they were all sort of separate little things, and there was a place called Prussia. And Prussia had a king, King Wilhelm the First, and there were many other principalities. But there was a person that was sort of like a secretary of state for Prussia who worked for Wilhelm I, and his name was Bismarck. Now Bismarck was really a type of Machiavellian type of thinker, her wanted to create Germany – he didn’t like the idea of all these principalities all over the place. He wanted to have one giant country called Germany. And he thought ‘how am I going to do this’.

Well, King Wilhelm he had a nephew in Spain, and he was trying to work it out so that nephew would be become the King of Spain. Now, Napoleon – that’s not Napoleon Bonaparte, were talking about Napoleon III who was the nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte, but none the less he ended up becoming the emperor of France. Napoleon actually sent his ambassador to Wilhelm in Prussia and said we do not appreciate you messing around with Spain because we don’t like to have potential hostile forces to the west and to the east of us. We’re not going to be surrounded, so you can’t mess with the other side of France (where Spain is), Then Wilhelm very politely said, ‘Well I can’t promise that I’ll never have a relative in Spain, but we’ll sort things out – we’re friends, don’t worry about it’. And he sent that back.
Bismarck on the other hand, took the telegram that was being sent back to Napoleon and intercepted it, and he rewrote it, and he basically said,’ Napoleon you can have the bird’ he said ‘----- you’, he said ‘we’re going to do whatever we want and there’s nothing you can do about it and you can go and jump in the lake’. That’s right, that’s what Bismarck wrote – well, he wrote some version like that. Anyway, Emperor Napoleon III, he was outraged he was ticked off. And when he was ticked off what he said was ‘this isn’t good’ – he was outraged, he popped a cork, and he launched a war against the German principalities.

Now, of course the German principality and King Wilhelm of Prussia, they were never told that Bismarck intercepted the telegram, the so called ELM telegram (that’s what they called it) - all they saw was that Napoleon was invading all the German principalities – They were like ‘what? What are you talking about? We didn’t do anything and you’re invading us for no reason whatsoever?’ So that caused all the German principalities to meet together in a congress, and they said, ‘the only way we can defend ourselves against that nut guy over there of France that’s invading us – is for us to join together and become a unified nation.’ And that’s how Germany came about.

Intervention – For Better For Worse
Now, let us say you’re the Galactic Federation of Worlds, and you see that the Germany principalities are being tricked into forming a nation, they’re being coerced, but they’re giving their free will, they’re giving their consent to form a nation. But they are being tricked. Now, the Galactic Federation of Worlds, what are supposed to do – Oh hey guys, this is a trick. Now if you really knew what was going on you’d inform a country called Germany.

So, since you don’t really know what’s going on, we should invade you. Is that right? Now, what would you rather have? A bunch of German principalities or the country of Germany that we have today? I think that everybody would state that the having the country of Germany that we have today is a really great idea. There’s nothing wrong with having the country of Germany. So, is the Galactic Federation of Worlds saying just because someone was coerced, and giving their consent - but they were being tricked, did that lead to a bad outcome? Should we invade to stop a good outcome even though the consent was through trickery. So, you don’t want to actually invade just because someone doesn’t give their consent.

Intervention - Prevention
Now let me talk a little about my son. When my son was very young, I had to take him in to get the mandatory vaccines of Chickenpox, Measles, and Mumps. And he was little, that’s my son Aziz, as you all know, and he was sitting on my lap, and I have a hold of him like this, and the nurse would come over with the needle, with the shot - with the vaccine that had all those things in it - and shot him. And he would shake Nooo Noooo – he was not giving his consent; he did not want to get the Measles the Chickenpox and the Mumps vaccine. He shook. Then afterwards he went around the entire hospital grounds – up and down the hallways, and talking to the nurses, and said ‘I don’t like vaccines, I don’t like to be given needles, and I don’t like the h?, and the nurse would just say ‘I understand, yes, yes, we don’t like that at all, but the school system.. , I understand Aziz’. But he didn’t get Mumps, Measles or Chickenpox. Now when I was growing up they didn’t have those and got Mumps, Measles and Chickenpox. The point is Aziz didn’t give his consent to get the mumps measles and chickenpox vaccine, and in fact I had to sort of hold him down while they were doing that…

Intervention – Violation - Considerations & Complications
Should the Galactic Federation of Worlds have invaded coming into the hospital room and taken me out, thrown me out of the window and say ‘No, this baby doesn’t want to get that Mumps, Measles and Chickenpox vaccine.’ Should they invade to stop that because it was a violation of his consent? And because Aziz di decide to be born with me, and live a life with me, we were vibrationally compatible. So, on another level we were giving our consent to exist in this life in the way it needed to be. And there were no school systems in Atlanta that would have accepted Aziz without the Mumps, Chickenpox and Measles vaccine, so he simply needed to do that.

Intervention – Politics
So, lets switch over to politics. Let’s talk about World War II. Now some people here are going to say ‘No, this isn’t possible Courtney, this is crazy’. OK but, this is the truth. Listen, listen carefully.

Continued...

Roosevelt & the Pacific Event
In WWII the Nazi’s had conquered most of Europe and they were bombing the heck out of Britain, and Britain was really upset about it. And Churchill met with Roosevelt on a destroyer in the North Atlantic and he said, ‘Roosevelt I don’t know what you’re thinking we’re going to (do), this is really bad, you’ve got to intervene now’. And Roosevelt said ‘I am not going to experience what Woodrow Wilson experienced in WWI, when he committed the US Forces to an invasion to resolve the WWI war in Europe, but having opposition in the United States’. So Woodrow Wilson had to fight Political opposition in the United States as well as the war in Europe. And he knew that fighting the Nazi’s was going to be an all or nothing type of thing. He couldn’t fight political opposition in the United States as well as fight the Nazi’s. He had to have all the opposition in the United States knocked out.
So, Woodrow Wilson was someone who had an experience that Roosevelt did not want to go through. And so, Woodrow knew that that time of thing would happen if he just intervened and tried to save Churchill and Britain right then and there.

So, what he said was ‘there’s going to be an incident, an incident in the Pacific, we’re going to wait for that incident to occur. And while we’re waiting, we will transform our economy to a war time economy. So, they signed something called the Land Lease Agreement, and what happened then was, they started to manufacture the tanks, the jeeps and all the types of equipment - and they would give the machinery, and the bullets, and the guns, to the Brits and the people who needed it in order to fight the war - but they would not commit American troops to it while they waited for the incident to happen in the Pacific.

Now the big question is, did Roosevelt know that there was going to be an attack on Pearl Harbour? That’s not ever been resolved, however, what we do know is that he knew that there was going to be some type of an incident in the Pacific, and they needed it, they were waiting for it, because that would silence all the opposition in the United States, and then there would be no opposition, and they could ,just commit the entire United States to the War - not just in the Pacific, but also in WWII.

And you can say ‘Corny, what in the world are you talking about? Where did you get this crazy cockamamie idea that Roosevelt may have been actually waiting for the Japanese to do something – attack America in some way?’ I got it from a guy called Turner Catledge, now he was the former editor in chief of the New York Times. And if you want to see him talking about this, then you go to YouTube and look up a video called Roosevelt Part 1 – Hail to the Chief, and the other one is Roosevelt Part 2 – Manipulator in Chief.

Roosevelt - Part 1: Hail To The Chief | Those Who Shaped the 20th Century, Ep. 10

High quality version, scanned in HD from the master film reel
Portrait of the only U.S. President to serve for four terms which third and fourth terms were dominated by World War II. Narrated by Henry Fonda.

Roosevelt - Part 2: Manipulator-In-Chief | Those Who Shaped the 20th Century, Ep. 11

High quality version, scanned in HD from the master film reel
Portrait of the only U.S. President to serve for four terms, which third and fourth terms were dominated by World War II. Narrated by Henry Fonda.

And what you see is Turner Catledge, who was the editor-in-chief of the New York Times - he eventually became the biggest managing editor of the NYT - he talks about how Roosevelt knew that something was going to happen in the Pacific - and actually some mention of expectations were given to the Australian ambassador as well, but he talks about how they knew that something was gong to happen, and they were concerned, very concerned about political opposition in the United States needing to be squashed, in order to be able to fight the war thoroughly.

The Event - Pearl Harbour
Now, let us say that Roosevelt knew that something was going to happen. Now I’m not saying that Roosevelt knew specifically about the attack on Pearl Harbour. There are some weird things that happened, for example: the entire US Navy (except for 2 boats) were brought into Pearl Harbour and the ammunition was taken out of the guns, and all types of things happened that made it impossible for the boats to get out of the harbour – they were just sitting there. And a Japanese ship like a submarine was actually observed not far outside of the Harbour. And none of the communications seemed to work, everything seemed to be set up in a weird way. And then of course the attack happened, and the US fleet was destroyed.

But then what happened, the 2 boats that did not get caught in Pearl Harbour, they went around and they did like cat and mouse game for like 3 or 4 months – and what they did was that they ran and they found some ships that were Japanese ships, and they would let themselves be seen but they didn’t engage them – (these 2 boats, these 2 destroyers) – then they would quickly zip across the ocean and show up and let themselves be seen where another set of Japanese boats were.

And so what was happening is that the Japanese were confused ‘I thought we destroyed all those boats’. But there was sighting after sighting making it seem that there was a whole bunch of American ships. And during that time, the Americans were actually building new destroyers and new aircraft carriers and new stuff frantically to get them online, and this is of course; aided by the fact that the Land Lease Agreement with Britain had already been done, and the factories had already been transformed into military factories, so they weren’t making spoons and cars, they were making tanks and bullets and things like that.

But none the less, Roosevelt was very clear – he was engaging in some version of coerced consent. He was going to set up the United States so that the United States would agree to having an all-out war, not only in the Pacific realm, but also in the Europe. He knew that the Nazi’s were the big threat.

Alright, so the question is; Should the Galactic Federation of Worlds have intervened? And said ‘no, you’re tricking the population, you are waiting for an incident happens in the Pacific.’ Again, I’m not saying that Roosevelt knew anything specifically about the exact attack on Pearl Harbour, I’m not saying that. I don’t know if he did or not, the point is, I’m not saying that. The point is that he was waiting for some incident to happen in the Pacific. So, should the Galactic Federation of Worlds have said ‘this is not right – you’re tricking people- you’re coercing their consent into a War – we’re going to invade you guys.’ Well what would have happened if Roosevelt was then was in a situation where he was being stopped from this, and then he had to intervene in WWII, and also fight political opposition at the same time – we could have lost the war. Remember the Germans were only a couple of months away from winning that war. They were very close to getting atomic weaponry at the end of WWII. Give them another 2 or 3 months and they might have actually had atomic weaponry – and we might have actually had brownshirts marching down Fifth Avenue. You have to understand it was very dicey.
So, should have the Galactic Federation of Worlds have stopped that coerced consent. It’s a question. I personally would have not wanted them to have stopped that coerced consent. I’m glad Roosevelt got the entire United States into the war and the allied forces actually persevered and so on.

Continued...

The Event - 911
Now, lets talk about something else – lets talk about the 911 event. If you talk about the 911 event you have to say, if you look at the situation that happened with 911, everyone just assumes that what you saw on the surface was what actually happened. But there’s a lot of awfully strange questions. So, we have done an entire project on 911, and if you look at that project you’ll see that what we hear from the mainstream doesn’t seem to match with what we get with the Remote Viewing stuff.

But there’s a lot of other strange stuff that has never been addressed – for example: I’m a trained pilot myself, and I’ve probably had more training as a pilot than any of those Islamic terrorists had. Its really hard to fly those planes they actually flew. I don’t think someone, even Tom Cruise as a Top Gun would have had trouble doing some of the things that they said that actually happened. For example: Building 7 of the World Trade Centre – that’s the third building, the two towers of course collapsed, but Building 7, how did that collapse?

Now building 7 was right next to the Two Towers and that was a really well constructed building. That building was actually the command centre for all of New York if a disaster happened. And it was made into the command centre because of how well it was constructed. Well, the authority said it collapsed on its footprint – it looked totally like a controlled demolition. And the controlled demolition issue was sub skirted by the authorities by saying ‘no, it was an office furniture fire that got started because of some jet fuel that got leaked out.’ In the history of all modern architecture, never, never has an office furniture fire brought down a building – especially not like that. It really looked like controlled demolition.

So, what we have is a situation that if it was a controlled demolition, those explosives had to be placed in there at least days or maybe a couple of weeks in advance. You cant just place those explosives in the building whilst the World Trade Centre Towers are collapsing at the very moment they’re burning up and collapsing. You’d have to place them in advance, so, its just a question. I’m not saying one way or the other. In fact, our whole 911 project I’m not saying its correct or incorrect, I’m just saying those are the data that we have for the 911 project, and it really raises a question whether there was some coerced consent in the terms of using that type of event for some other purpose.

The Event Purpose – Demolition & Invasion - Iraq & Afghanistan
The World Trade Centres themselves were very large buildings, they had been damages by a terrorist event in the basement previously, and they were filled with asbestos, and basically needed to come down anyway. So, the question is how are you going to take them down? – it would have cost a billion dollars to take them down girder by girder. So, the real question is, should the buildings be used to demolition the building, for some other purpose. Well, the purpose was of course to invade Iraq where the oil wells were – and of course, invade Afghanistan.

And you can sort of say how did the invasion of Afghanistan work? How did it turn out? Well, we just left Afghanistan in total defeat. And then you can say ‘Was it worth it what happened in Iraq? And could sort of say, you know, that’s really not comparable to what happened defeating the Nazi’s in WWII – But it’s a real question. Was there any coerce consent? – and again I am not saying one way or the other, I'm just saying we have our own Remote Viewing data and it seems to be pointing to a much more complicated event than mainstream is simply having us believe.

The Event Purpose – The Pentagon
Also, the situation with the bombing of the Pentagon in the 911 stuff. Its not at all clear how a jumbo jet can fly at treetops, and as soon as it gets over the grounds of the Pentagon, immediately dived down and turn out and fly a few feet over the grass – like, just a few feet over the grass, until it hits the Pentagon building. Not even Tom Cruise Top Gun could have done that. And doing it with a fighter jet would have been hard – its impossible to figure out how a jumbo jet could have manoeuvred in that kind of way. And the other thing is whatever did hit the Pentagon doesn’t seem to have had wings – there are no wings in the wreckage. So most jumbo jets to my knowledge have wings. So, there’s a real question – I’m not saying one thing or the other, I’m just saying there are questions involved.

Consent by Coercion – Weapons of Mass Destruction
Now if you were the Galactic Federation of Worlds, and you were seeing stuff going on, and it looked like it was a really complicated thing going on, and it might have been coercion, then should you have gotten involved? Is it something where you should have made the decision? If they really knew what was going on they wouldn’t want to happen - so were going to do that? Do you get involved every time consent is given?

Now consent was given. Even the New York Times gave an editorial where they agreed it was time to invade Afghanistan and Iraq – and when the invasion of Iraq was given it was said Iraq has weapons of mass destruction and unless we go into Iraq, they’re going to use those weapons of mass destruction against us. Turned out to be later – that they Used Collin Powell in front of the United Nations to convince everybody that there were weapons of mass destruction there. Turned out later there were no WMD in Iraq whatsoever. And the whole story that Collin Powell talked about was crazy. So the whole idea of invading Iraq had no basis, but none the less, they were going there – and you can say; what was actually the reason they were wanting to go there? The only reason they went to Iraq was the oil – there was no other reason to be there. Is that a good justification for tricking people ‘there are weapons of mass destruction so we must invade Iraq’ – is that a good reason? So, coercion. That’s a form of coercion. So, you say there’s going to be a threat unless you actually do it.

Extraterrestrial - Invasion or Intervention
Let’s now get to the idea of the Extra-terrestrial. The Reptilians understand what’s going on with the Galactic Federation of Worlds. In the galaxy, the Reptilian empire is apparently stronger than the Galactic Federation of Worlds. One on one the Reptilian Empire plus the old Orion Empire they would win. But in this neighbourhood - and this solar system the best we can figure out is that the Galactic Federation of Worlds dominates totally. Meaning they have focused so many resources in this particular solar system the Reptilians and the Orion’s would not be able to survive. But if there was open conflict, earth would be a casualty, earth would become a cinder.
So, they know the Galactic Federation of Worlds doesn’t invade places, doesn’t intervene unless there’s a level of free will consent that they, the Galactic Federation of Worlds, will accept.

So, we’ve gone through a whole bunch of examples from WWII, the possibility of the question of 911 stuff, definitely the ELM telegram, and the Franco German war – this is very, very, common for this type of thing to happen.

Continued...

Coerced Consent – Vietnam War
(*Following Edited for clarification – correction was given by Courtney in the video) And the beginning of the Vietnam war; with the stories that turned out to be crazy – that US battle ships were being attacked by the North Vietnamese, and they had to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - they said there were two attacks. The first attack turned out to be small arms fire from a small North *Korean Vietnamese boat who thought that USS Maddocks was in North *Korean Vietnamese territory – which it was. But the second attack against USS Maddox simply didn’t happen at all. This is not in dispute. This is not in dispute – the second attack didn’t happen at all.
But Johnson went to congress and said in an outraged voice ‘we have to be able to defend ourselves, you must give us the ability to defend ourselves while we’re being attacked by this North *Korean Vietnamese aggression.’ (*end edits)
So, the real question was the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was the event that congress was coerced into agreeing to and that led to the full-scale invasion and US escalation of the Vietnam war. And how did that turn out? Turned out Terrible. We lost that war. And in fact, Vietnam is our Ally now.

So, the real question is, even in in situations like that, it was none the less consent that the congress did, even though it was coerced – should the Galactic Federation of Worlds have invaded by saying ‘well if they really knew what was going on they wouldn’t give their consent’ – no, they don’t do that. So the Galactic Federation of Worlds says ‘it looks for consent’ – they look for some consent, even coerced consent. And if there’s consent, even coerced consent, they say ‘they decided to do it – so let them do it’.

Coerced Consent – Antarctica’s Operation Highjump
So, what happened, and you can see this in our Project Highjump that we did, Operation Highjump is the name of our Project, what we got from that was that the Reptilians, after WWII, helped set up a Nazi base in Antarctica. And then Admiral Byrd and his armada was sent to Antarctica to wipe out that last vestige of the Nazi threat out of Antarctica. And they sent an aircraft carrier, 13 ships, tonnes of aircraft, 5000 personnel, armed to the teeth to go wipe them out, and the public statement was they were looking to do some exploration in Antarctica for the possibility of future bases they might do.

But that was such a ridiculous thing – you don’t do something like that. You don’t send out a fully armed armada with 5000 troops, tons of aircraft, all types of destroyers and submarines, and armed to the teeth – you don’t send them out just to look for some places that might be a good place to build a base. You send maybe one or two ships and maybe one scout aircraft, but you don’t send an armed flotilla.

So, what basically happened according to our Operation Highjump project, is when the US went there to find the Nazi base, they were attacked, and they were attacked ruthlessly and they were knocked out of the sky, then they had to leave with their tail dragging. And then what basically happened is that they were set up – now the US forces did not understand that the people flying the craft that were attacking US forces were high technology craft – basically spaceships – were not actually Nazi’s. But as far as the United States were concerned it looked like the Nazi were in control, or in possession of very advanced technology, and that they could invade the United States mainland and wipe out the entire US military in just a matter of a few days, and they could invade it from Antarctica. And the United States were terrified.

And so, the military wing of the United States, a certain group within the military, was then approached, apparently by the Galactic Federation of Worlds as well as the Reptilians and Orion’s (in a sort of an alliance there) – and the Galactic Federation of Worlds did not offer them weapons, but they said they could protect them. On the other hand, the Reptilian and Orion’s, (according to our project), said ‘no we offer you weapons assistance as well’ – none of that really happened.

The promise of help never materialized – like the US was expecting. But none the less the US gave its consent for the reptilians and the Orion’s to actually build bases - and they’re really, really, really, good at underground bases. And our understanding now is that there is a huge infrastructure of underground stuff. And if you want to say like ‘where’? Well, one big place is (look at our Area 51 Project) it’s under Area 51.

Coerced Consent – Null & Void
Its not a small thing like a room down there, its really extensive underground facilities, and the US by the leadership gave their consent. That is why we got involved in the public negotiations with extra-terrestrials because – but the public negotiations with the extra-terrestrials – we publicly stated that we do not give our consent – that those agreements that were signed back in the day were not signed with free will – they were never made public. So, the public has never given its consent and we reject them totally – they are null and void. It was very important for us to do this publicly. It doesn’t really matter that a majority of the human population understands it, but the Galactic Federation of Worlds needs to see that somebody on this planet understands it, and they’re willing to openly state ‘These agreements that prevented the Galactic Federation of Worlds from intervening back in the day, 1940 and 50’s, are Null and Void from our perspective, and we do not give our consent. That gives the Galactic Federation of Worlds an opportunity to intervene. To look for our paternities to intervene. For now, they can say there are Groups, and this Planet and humanity is openly stating that those agreements were null and void and giving reasons for it. Do you get the idea? This is really important. So that is why we did this public negotiation with ETs to make sure that the Galactic Federation of Worlds understood that we give our consent, and that those agreements were made without any consent whatsoever – and they were never made public so no consent could ever have been gotten – so they are Null and Void. So that’s why we did that.

Now the Galactic Federation of Worlds is on notice, they have to make a decision because now, its clear that consent was not there. And in fact, since the agreements were never made public that were done between the military and the Reptilians and Orion’s, that those things for at least some portion of the population, considering those agreements to be not worth the paper they’re written on – Null and Void, that type of a thing.

Continued...

Coercion – Current Events
Now I’m going to switch gears a little bit – by the way, I’m not coming down and telling you what you should consent to and what you shouldn’t consent to. I going to bring up one of the most contentious issues that is on the planet today, and even within our audience. I want to talk about the current vaccine debates, OK. The Covid stuff. Now just listen folks. I’m not going to get into the debate of whether people should or shouldn’t get the vaccines, I’m not getting into that.

Coercion - Lockdown
I’m saying, take a look at what’s happening in Germany, and the United Kingdom right now. They just put everybody’s who’s not got a vaccine under lockdown because of the new Omicron variety of variant of the Covid thing. And basically, they’re hospital systems are collapsing, they’re totally filled up and they don’t have the ability to handle sick people and they’re panicking.

Now politicians don’t want to do a lockdown because in fact they know that the public really doesn’t like that, and so they suffer politically when that type of thing happens – but they made the decision. Is that coercion? Of course, that’s coercion. People are being put under house arrest in a sense by having this lockdown, they can only get out for essential things such as to go grocery shopping, or go to the hospital, That’s coercion, and if you have that should then – you make a decision – should the Galactic Federation of Worlds get involved because there is coercion in that sense?

Coercion - Mandatory
Now Germany and Austria are considering making vaccines – the Covid vaccines – mandatory in February for the entire nation. So, it would no longer be a voluntary thing – it would be mandatory. That’s coercion. Now the real question that you want to ask is, Is that coercion a good thing or a bad thing? Now you have to understand, in every aspect of life there’s coercion one way or the other – there’s always coercion. Put yourself in the situation of the Galactic Federation of Worlds. At what point does the coercion justify a Galactic Federation of Worlds invasion. Their heavy involvement to get involved to resolve something like that. OK. So, understand, don’t get upset with me on the vaccine thing, I’m not saying one way or the other, I’m not getting involved, I’m not telling anyone to get the vaccine or not, I’m not doing that, I’m just pointing out that governments do, are, engaged with coercion, and the real question is Put yourself in the position of the Galactic Federation of Worlds – which elements of coercion justify intervention?

Coercion – Consent – Free Will & Galactic Federation of Worlds
So, the basic understanding that we can figure out here at Farsight is for the Galactic Federation of Worlds to get involved with something that’s involving coercion - with regards to free will. Is the following – you have this idea vibration, so just by being vibrationally compatible and you’re in that situation, you have sort of given your free will to exist in that situation anyway. Meaning ‘I give my Free Will, its because of my consent, to go into the ocean. Now, by free will I decided to go into the ocean to do surfing – I love surfing – should I then blame somebody or demand to be rescued if a shark comes my way. It was my free will to go into the ocean in the first place – I am vibrationally compatible with sharks that are actually in the water.

So the Galactic Federation of Worlds has to say, on the level of vibration they sort of got them selves in that situation in the first place, so, at what point does the coercion actually become something that they should decide to intervene. Apparently, among the higher up debates that the Galactic Federation of Worlds is involved in, this idea of coerced consent is a huge issue for them. They apparently really think about it a lot. And they really tried to decide is it a good idea to get involved? Because coerced consent was actually used to get that consent to be able to do something.
And that’s not an easy question. So what I’m trying to tell you is don’t have answers with regard to coerced consent weather it’s a good thing or a bad time. It happens all the time everywhere. You give your consent to drive around on the street and if you speed or go through a red light the government is going to come in and stop you, and take money from you, and possibly send you to court. They are coercing you, but you gave your consent to operate on the streets in the first place by getting a diver’s license and so on. So, the question is at what point does a third party have the right to come in and intervene and the GALACTIC FEDERATION OF WORLDS thinks about this a lot. That’s the purpose of todays talk. Tto give you an idea that with all of the examples of coercion that I’ve given, it’s a hard question. Free Will is compromised with coercion because you’re getting consent , they’re saying its OK but your doing it under the conditions of coercion. At what point and for what issues does that justify intervention from a larger group like the Galactic Federation of Worlds.

Friends, what I'm trying to tell you, it’s a really hard decision. It’s a hard question. So we have no real easy answer to that. I don’t have any real answers to the idea of coercion, whether in regard to any of the issues we’ve talked about – WWII, 911, reptilians involved with operation Highjump, the ELM telegram and if Bismarck did the right thing by tricking Napoleon into invading the principalities. I don’t have any position to say this was right and that was wrong. I’m not making any such decisions. I'm just saying the questions are very hard. But coerced consent is a fact of life.

Continued...

Coercion – The Upcoming False Flag Event
The last thing I want to talk about is the idea of a false flag.
Friends, you have to except the idea that coerced consent is a fact of life. And at some point in time the authorities, the governmental authorities, are going to decide that they cannot hold back on the discussion of the extra-terrestrial existence. Already the US military has allowed, through the US Navy paramilitary, the publication of 140 UFO cases that they say – these are real craft, they are flying in out atmosphere, they’re not made by the United States, Russia, or China, but we don’t know where they came from. Now folks, that happened back in Jube of this year 2021, so obviously they’re saying that aliens exist in some way but they’re not willingly to openly state that because the political authorities are the ones to make that decisions or something like that. But the reality is at some point the political authorities are going to have to say OK we are going to have to talk about this. And when that happens, they’re going to want to maintain control.

It’s going to be obvious to the entire world that they have been duped for decade – that the authorities have known about the ETs for a very long time – they’ve not talked about it – they’ve had secret agreements that allowed the reptilians and Orion’s to establish a foothold here for the manipulation of huge numbers, millions of members of humanity, basically the enslavement of the planet – all that’s going to come out. And the government authorities are going to say we’re going to have to stay in control. So, one of the ways they are probably going to do it is through coerced consent. Remember the Wilhelm telegram, ELM telegram, that where the telegram was sent from – and Turner Catledge of the New York Times, and remember Operation Highjump, and remember the Vietnam War – major things happen when they’re used in order to distract people. Like magicians. You move something with your right hand so they don’t see what your left hand is doing.

So, at some point the authorities are going to want to maintain control after talking about openly about ET exist. And theyre almost certainly going to have what they calla false flag – which is something like an alien attack that’s faked and then the military authorities defeating it and saying now you have to rally behind us because there’s a threat out there. And that is most likely, Id say almost certain going to be some play that is going to be used. Its like a poker play. Theyre going to use that in order to maintain control so that false flag is going to happen. And what theyre going to try and do is to get congress to authorize them to do all types of things to get the public to calm down and to go along with whatever the governments say because heaven’s its an alien attack, there is aliens out there, and they’re hostile, so the government should protect us – save us – save us – and that’s what the people will shout, and that’s what the governments want to happen. So that sort of false flag is what its all about, and its inevitable that something like that is going to happen, the biggest mistake is going to say – ‘they wouldn’t do that – they lied to us, no – are you serious, nah’. That’s the problem. That’s the problem!

OK – so they would try to, and what I want our audience to know is that this is modus operundi, this is what they do. So the idea of having coerced consent is the idea of the false flag - expect it. Don’t think ‘maybe… no’, say Yes, it will happen’. But the question is, when it happens, under what conditions it happens, it will be creative, but the basic idea of a false flag is a form of engineering the coerced consent, which is what they’re going to go after. And the one thing I really want to leave you with is that there is no way to eliminate coerced consent. However, I do have one final piece of advice, and this is the only real advice I have for you – and it regards almost anything you think about, anything at all…

Coercion – Free Will Universe
… This is a free will Universe, but you have to insist that you do or do not give your consent, and when there is coerced consent, you have to recognise that you are giving your consent under coercion. But if you are in a situation where you adamantly that you do not want to give your consent to something; if a perpetrator has kidnapped somebody and is threatening them, the worst thing the person could do is to… well, I don’t want to say the worst thing a person could do, the person has to make a decision of what they want to do – but one thing that you probably all want to think about is ; how strongly you want to emphasise the idea of never giving your consent. If you don’t like something, just say NO – just say No, just say ‘no, you’re never giving your consent for something’. At some point you may have to compromise because of the coercion – the threat may become too real for you – you may start to believe it; in which case the coerced consent becomes an issue.

False Flag - Coercing Consent
But with regards to the extra-terrestrial issue, which is the big thing I’m talking about, I guess the only advised I would actually give you is when the false flag happens, not if, but when the false flag happens don’t give your consent. It’s not worth it to give your consent. In your mind at least say NO, I know this can be different. At that point you can look up at the sky at night and say ‘I do not give my consent for this authoritative seizing of control. What I would like is for the Galactic Federation of Worlds to intervene.’ And then you say that when you’re looking up at the sky. They’ll hear. They will recognize that a certain proportion of the population is not giving its consent. If however, when the false flag happens and its successful in coercing the consent of the whole planet – very much like what happened what happened after 911 when Collin Powell convinced the Unite d Nations and the New York Times, and that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction – everybody gave their consent, and then we had the invasion of Iraq. Well, if that type of thing happens and everyone’s sort of says it’s OK, we have an alien attack and now we have to defend ourselves against it – the government can do what it wants. And what is the Galactic Federation of Worlds going to do? In order for them to do anything they need for you to reject coerced consent. You have to be – now I’m not talking about all issues – I’m not talking about vaccine issues, I’m not talking about issues regarding whether you should get a ticket when you’re driving down the street, I’m not talking about those issues, I’m talking about the false flag extra-terrestrial invasion issue. That’s the only biggy that I’m talking about today. At that point you want to be very clear that you do not give your consent for the takeover of the planet by the authorities, to repress information, you want the Galactic Federation of Worlds to intervene for open information about what has happened in the past to occur, and for a new age and a new beginning for that type of thing. That’s when the coerced consent can be defeated by you not giving your consent.

And that’s really what I wanted to leave you about today. When I talked about all the other issues from perpetrators and victims and vaccines and everything else, those are just used as examples so you can get the idea of how widespread coercion is in all aspects of society. And again, just to, ‘oh its not going to be possible’ – ‘people are going to start talking one way or the other about the vaccine issue, its such a big thing’ – I’m not really getting involved in that vaccine issue, and that has nothing to do with the talk today. This talk has something else going on. I’m talking about the false Flag - the extra-terrestrial type of stuff.

Consent - If you want a better world, insist on the better world
So, if my advice to sort of ‘don’t bring up the vaccine stuff’ I’m talking about the big stuff, and I’m comparing that to all the other types of situations where coercion is used, I’m just using those other examples as other example of how coercion actually happens. And so, what I really want you to take home message for this talk is the False flag thing is going to happen. And when it happens, you do not need to give your consent. That’s the bottom line. You do not need to give your consent. If you want a better world, insist on the better world, not a power grab by authorities that want to maintain their control so that their activities of the past are not revealed. Do not give your consent. Say to yourself and when you look up ‘I do not give my consent and I would like an intervention from the Galactic Federation of Worlds as an act of free will’

That’s it guys – I will talk to you next time.

End of Transcript.

‘Brainwashing’ - It’s not just us tin-foil-hat wearing social aliens or the politically correct who see this coercive persuasion in plain sight – I thought this video from Professor Tinsdale also explained the situation well.
‘Coercive Persuasion’ was a term given by the military to replace the psychologically named term of ‘Brainwashing’.

.
Dark Persuasion - The History of Brainwashing from Pavlov to Social Media

Youtube Description: Dimsdale is distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Department of Psychiatry at UC San Diego. [11/2021] Joel Dimsdale discusses his latest book “Dark Persuasion: A History of Brainwashing from Pavlov to Social Media,” which traces the evolution of brainwashing from its beginnings in torture and religious conversion into the age of neuroscience and social media.

On closing his presentation, Prof. Tinsdale said –
(46:35) George Orwell soberly observed, ‘if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever’.
From my point of view, if we ignore the potential of brainwashing and the developments in the 21st century, then we are defenceless, and Orwell have been right.
But I do believe we have a choice.
We need to look back and consider how brainwashing developed in the 20th century, to prepare ourselves for the new century. We need to listen to H.G. Wells who warned that human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. We are in such a race now. It's up to us to define the emerging contours of dark persuasion.
Thank you.

0:00 Opening & Introduction
3:23 Presentation start. Two questions consider.
3:50 Genesis of the project
5:10 What does "brainwashing" mean?
6:25 Pavlov & The Soviets
13:23 Truth Serum
18:03 Cold War & Korea
25:30 CIA and Academe
32:50 Stockholm Syndrome
35:36 Patricia Hearst
40:30 Lethal Religious Communes
44:22 The Future
47:48 Q&A

Weapons of Mass Distraction and Weapons of MisDirection

In the Intelligence Briefing Courtney said: ‘major things happen when they’re used in order to distract people. Like magicians. You move something with your right hand, so they don’t see what your left hand is doing.’

I have posted this before, but it’s one of the best examples of misdirection (explained) I can find

Misdirection – ‘A term of Art’ - Penn Jillette (Magician)
‘A curating of attention, giving the audience a story they can tell themselves not letting them know they have been distracted’.

.

Penn & Teller impresses the Tonight Show audience with a vanishing chicken and a lot of misdirection.

Magic - Even when people are being lied to, tricked & cheated – they still applaud.
And if they are really fooled, they applaud louder.

This Magic trick said so much to me – also Penn’s narrative to show the distinction between what a skilled magician can do, and what a ‘magical’ magician does (lying, cheating, swindling) both to gain the confidence and use the susceptibility, of their audience.

And it also reminds me of what is happening as we go into virtual reality social media eco-systems – such as the Metaverse. We know that something nefarious is going on, but everyone is waiting for the punchline at the end, hoping that this time, it will be better ‘experience’ than the old version.
But it won’t. It is the nature of the Beast, and it now steps up its Game Plan and stretches its reach a little longer and a little wider to click that lock to capture people, especially younger people, in.
Remember, all of these ‘good’ things ALWAYS start off as a game – something fun and harmless – but it’s their game you play, and you play it by their rules, and they always win.

.
Penn & Teller Show Off a Lying, Cheating, Swindling Card Trick

This is a very well animated and narrated illustration of Menticide - the Totalitarian psychosis - and what we can do about it.
This also supports Courtney's points on Coercion and Consent.
.
MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL
Published