@[deleted} AKA Exodus AKA EnkiSatya also known as Jon Smith, a word of advice - things change. You seem to be having some problems with change, and view it as entirely negative.

Really, the only constant IS change. To keep people running about scared about the future.

There are 3 kinds of change - Change for the sake of Change (to keep people busy so they don't rebel); Change for the Worse (which is what you are labelling all change as); and rarely, Change for the better.

Just my $.02 worth on your current passion for panic and headless chicken mode. It's really your problem. Not mine.

@CyKo
"(1) Change for the sake of Change (to keep people busy so they don't rebel)"

OK. First, the difference between rebellion (activity designed to thwart governance, usually futile) and revolution, which is CHANGE OF WHO IS IN GOVERNANCE OR THE REASONS FOR SUCH PEOPLE BEING "IN CHARGE" SHIFTING.

If you have the position of RESPONSIBILITY FOR GOVERNANCE then it's in your interest to avoid people choosing rebellion. There are different means of that, but changing the way people have to "conform" is a great way of soaking up their excess energy.

"(2) Change for the Worse (which Pat is suggesting Jon is too focus on)"

OK. Here is the thing, "worse" is relative here. In terms of, who gets a particular benefit ("good" thing) or malignity (DELIBERATE bad thing).

There is also the case of a "Change for the worse" happening because a perceived benefit of the change turns out to be less troublesome than a malignity ("bad stuff happening") that isn't DELIBERATE but is just plain done in ignorance of the consequences. There is no "malign intent" so much as "stupid consequences".

The snag with EnkiSatya also known as Jon is, he doesn't see any benefit from these changes at all. He's painting them all as life threatening to the whole of humanity. Which isn't necessarily the case, but it IS an alarming, distressing and harassing mode to post messages.

It's not so much the message as the INTENT OF EnkiSatya also known as Jon Smith I am questioning, and whether or not "Jon" is even aware of these factors.

"(3) Change for the better"

Removal of existing "bad stuff" and replacing it with more and better resources rather than "liabilities".

More jam and jello to eat without needing a bunch of people in slavery to make the sugar, for instance.

Get where I'm coming from here? It's about "DOOM! DOOM DOOM!" nonsense and I'm having none of that, thank you very much.

I am about more resources, more assets, and more life and more happy. The negative stuff can go fuck itself, pardon my Anglo Saxon.

"Germany's Vice Chancellor Habeck, a Green Party member, wants Chinese-like censorship of the social media platform X because Elon Musk supports Trump."

To the tune of $1 million a day is somewhat beyond what the law regulating elections allows in Federal Elections.

"Alt-Right incensed, furious and raging at foreign elected politions pointing out how their electoral system is being hijacked by the ultra elite privaleged few."

I can't tell here whether these things you are posting are things you are for or against.

And from my point of view, the privaledged few ruling elite have been doing pretty much whatever they wanted to for thousands of years already.

NWO = OWO with a fancy new paint job, brother. Just posting a limited sound byte of your take on a news political event is somewhat... pointless?

Financial; emergency? He's running out of money after paying way too much for Twatter?

That's so sad. I might even have to break wind to show my respects to Elon Musk, Twatter, and the other bankrupt bits and pieces of America Inc.

Wars cost money. This is why America doesn't have any money. It's very simple idea.

It certainly isn't a conspiracy of clever people who call themselves "The New World Order".