I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

The whole book lies on the premise that Matilda was real and that those accounts were real, so I don't agree with looking at the "character" of the story before looking at the authors.

@André

Yes of course FS needs to check the authors and certainly not the characters... or else they would just be building yet ANOTHER project on this one and only holy book.

It could be LORD OF THE RINGS. One can make 20+ pojects based on characters and narratives inside this book.

Is this what they have been doing? I am not the only one to suggest this. This is what Birdie the ex-director of FS seems to think. And she is a specialist on the RV topic. I also suspect Dick Allgire to think the same.

To clarify everything, FS (or any other group) needs to target the author(s) of this book and even beyond... To target the source or authors of specific narrative elements inside the book... For this they could label certain narratives elements inside the book.

Before using RV, I would already try to find if certain things in the book have been written before. If this forum was more populated people would help. Or maybe Chat GPT. I do not know enough myself.

I am curious about the Veda Hymns and the story of the 3000. All this narrative related to the "DOMAIN". Where does it come from? Did it exists ANYWHERE before 2008?

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

Too lazy? As you can see working for free I am, on this amazing thread. I don't know maybe FS has hired me in secret to warm up the audience for their next project.

Seriously if I am trying to do something... it is evaluating the data and pointing out possible methodical flaws. If you remote view Santa Claus you might see Santa Claus.

I try to find the right questions but I don't have the answers. I recently read Spencer's book just after seeing all FS projects and it felt weird. So many projects come for one book.

So I think it makes sense for FARSIGHT not for me, to check their FOUNDATION. To check the authors of the book, the sources... not the characters or the content itsel as they have ALREADY done pretty well.

Right after reading the book I heard CB declare it is going to be their next project! I thought good this is amazing.

But the last FS "weekly" video says they are going to focus on "Airl"... the character inside the book. I am not sure this is a good idea: it does not seem very scientific.

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

Manuel posted a thread with the perfect question here:

https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/suggestions-for-new-projects/70540-remote-viewing-fiction

I am asking myself the same question, so I will quote him below.

...

REMOTE VIEWING FICTION

I was a bit disappointed with how the target of the Airl project was worded. Farsight looked for Airl as if the being exists, and they saw her like the book described her. This can mean two things:

1. Airl is real, or
2. the viewer can perceive fiction as if it's real.

I would like to see the remote viewers at Farsight, who are the best on the planet, to look into a fictional target, so we can compare the collected data with targets that exist in reality.

For example, view Frodo when he's throwing the ring into the fires of Mount Doom, or Neo when he's flying through a city inside the Matrix.

What will the viewers see? Will they see nothing? Will they see the story like a movie and feel that it's not real? Or will they see it as if it's real?

It's worth noting that the RV sessions done by Farsight include telepathic communication as well as what Airl is doing now. If Airl is a fictional character, this would raise even more questions.

My intuition to the book is that it's based on real characters. But the story has been tampered with, and the name Airl is not the right one. At this moment, I'm considering the possibility that the Domain doesn't exist like it's described in the book.

I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

"but all viewers caught very different data for that focus."

Because they were doing their sessions at different times, so "now" also means different times.

"It has been Farsight's foundation for so many projects."

It has been the foundation for formulating the targets – that doesn't mean what the viewers saw is wrong. For example, when looking into the Domain, the target was worded:

Target 1: The group that first introduced the original Vedic hymns in the Himalayas.

Target 2: The political headquarters of the Domain in the Milky Way Galaxy.

First of all, this formulation doesn't mean that the group in the Himalayas was part of the Domain. And the problem with the second target is: What is meant by "the Domain"? There's no reference to the book. Will the viewer see what Courtney had in mind when formulating the target? Is it even the exact wording that was used?

"Maybe Courntey has other reasons to believe the content of this book based on other sources and personal experience"

Aziz mentioned in one of the target reveals that they looked into the book many years ago, but it's different this time. What was he referring to? How many viewings did Farsight make that we know nothing about? And what about their "ET friends" they know "since the beginning" – did they tell them to look into certain things, and the book is just a placeholder?

It's not very transparent what's happening here.

Are you referring to me specifically?

I have quoted recent contents from the book, 1. To clear up a possible misunderstanding regarding Airl's Engineer status with Manuel, and 2. To provide further context in Amara's thread dialogue with her relative, in how it is reflected in Alien Interview for those who haven't yet read the book.

How does making quotes make me a religious person? Doesn't it simply mean I have read the book, and provided clarification on something not quite right and another in support?

FYI, Amara's thread is the first time I have heard anyone from Scientology (other than Hubbard) ally so close with some Alien Interview content. This could be used both for and against Alien Interview. EG, was Spencer a high enough level to be exposed to the same information as Amara's relative? And if so, was it used in his book? Only Spencer knows. Or perhaps both sources (Scientology and Alien Interview) support each other?

Your post:

"I see people here constantly refer to Spencer's book as an authentic story... and quoting "AIRL" as a gospel that has been revealed.

For Farsight it is clearly a book of revelations. In my humble opinion it is not rational enough. Even if some concepts are true. Refering to this book is an act of faith.

Farsight's recent project about "Airl" is not scientific or investifative in any way. It is yet another act of celebration towards the book.

Scientology is very interesting. But Spencer's book makes me think of the book of Mormon.

It is presented to you as is - with a proud and bold absence of proofs - and you are requested to believe it or not.

People who refer to AIRL and to MATHILDA in their discourse are religious people."

I was not referring to you at all... or anyone in particular :)

It was in general about this "death trap" topic. And other scientology elements. I am pointing out this concept (even if true) comes from sources that are ALL scientology related. It scientology speaking with itself.

(1) Spencer is a scientologist, he publishes a book in 2008. (2) Today Amara reports the content of the book to another scientologist. (3) OMG that's sooo weird...

If someone wants to relate scientology concepts to a real ET from Roswell, he need to do what we call "an act of faith." He needs to believe in Spencer.

And this is what Spencer is asking his reader to do. He screams very loudly he has zero proofs as if it was a good thing.

And we know BELIEVING is religious, right? To believe is to be religious. If one relies on Spencer's narrative without proof, one becomes religious.

"People who refer to AIRL and to MATHILDA in their discourse are religious people."

For my part, I refer to the possibility of them being real, which doesn't mean that I believe they must be real.

People have a hard time understanding how to think in possibilities. They hear or read a statement and think it's the truth because it is said or written. This one-dimensional way of thinking is a mental program that was given to humans to make them better slaves who won't question their masters.

The truth is: One can ask questions and discuss topics without believing them. If you can't do that, you are a religious person.

I already told you I was the son of Amun Râ and how he met my mother but you did not seem interested in this possibility.

What you are doing is called "tripping". You are tripping.

Why should I be interested in your parents? Your father seems to be a bad person. Welcome to the club.

I don't know what you mean by tripping. I know what the word means, but how does it apply to what I'm saying?

I understand your approach.

But why start from the ABOVE which is not visible to everyone?

My approach is opposite... I guess it should lead us to the same point in the end.

I think it makes more sense to start from the below. What is DIRECTLY here in front of your face, killing you TODAY.

I think it is wiser to start with solid real documented EVENTS like JFK... like 911... and 20 years of fabricated "War on Terror"... and follow the thread, from BELOW to ABOVE. Step by step without skiping.

The reality is here. ISRAEL in your face... with its parent, the group we call the CABAL or the CULT.

It is a satanic branch of Judaism that worships "the devil". It is called Zionism that it managed to "eat" or overcome or take over most of Judaism and most of Christianity (Catholics with Vatican 2) and most of Islam (the sunni Golf countries allied to the US and UK).

This "hybrid trash" as you call them (Zio-Illumiati) are the closest and most visible element for all of us to see. They are the ones who sacrifice children. So in my view they are the priority target. EVERYTHING should be pointed at them. There is nothing else that this "hybrid trash".

Israel represents the hard and pure evil/fascist side of that BEAST... and Soros, Rothchild, Obama represent the soft-power side of the BEAST (with an apparent care for freewill... as Courtney seems to like it). These factions are fighting but it is an internal fight... and the real victim is us and our world.

So the question is: why would a potential victim of this crazy system - like you or me - start making sentences with Enlil and Marduk in 4D... before dealing with the real killer in front of us?

Start from the root. From your material body. And then move up slowly to your higher self.

Last but not least: why don't you use remove viewing? I think it is a requirement. This is the topic that brings us together in this discussion. It takes us out of our SUBJECTIVITY and brings us to some kind of OBJECTIVITY.

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/suggestions-for-new-projects/62056-the-anunnaki

The interesting thing is that there is data now about Airl, so there's a person out there that was the Roswell ET back in 1947, and they found this person because it's the one they mean when they use the name Airl.

I have a feeling that Airl being an anagram for Liar is an important information. There's an untold story there. My guess is that the Domain is not what it pretends to be. Strong "Overlord" vibes, if you know what I mean.

@Cy Ko

Agreed! It would be nice to have something more concrete about Mr Spencer. There are links to him and Scientology, and using almost the same text in places as Hubbard did in several of his dialogues. Spencer passed Jan 2022, but indicated he would like to be with the Domain. Farsight should do a session on Spencer, it could offer some insight.

@Manuel

There's also Sanni Ceto who wrote a book, (she is/was alive on planet here) who is claiming she is the reincarnated Commander of a crashed ship in the desert of NM in 1947. She has some drawings in the book that are interesting.

Sanni's account does not really ally much with Alien Interview and was published in 2004, before Alien Interview.

*FCGFI ... whatever.