I don't know who pointed this out to me but I am grateful that Andrew Bustamente is putting up his thoughts.
Once you adopt the idea that we are in fact entities that exist completely independent of our physical bodies, one can throw out the useless-humans theory out the window. Even though that doesn't make us super special
If we are in fact monkeys caged within our bodies then the useless-humans theory is quite valid.
That's why they can never comprehend the extra dimensional aliens all around us. "Scientists" are very much materialistic and can't comprehend occult phenomena.
Tazz
Hopi Prophecy about the Man in the Red Hat
I hope, this will come true, cause our food here in US is so toxic as hell.
If Trump and Kennedy Jr. don't clean up the mess then it's pretty much game over.
Hopi Prophecy Man in the Red Hat
HOPI PROPHECY - Two Paths: Destruction or Survival
Enjoy & share!
"If we are in fact monkeys caged within our bodies then the useless-humans theory is quite valid."
Let's say the ETs are interested in the planet's resoruces more than in its inhabitants. Can you start a mining operation right away? How "useful" are the planet's inhabitants if you just want to dig?
Let's say the ETs need allies because they fight a war against some big enemy. How useful are humans to be a good ally? How much do you have to invest to make them good allies? Will it be worth it?
I can think of many scenarios where humans are useless even though they are eternal beings like everybody else.
"That's why they can never comprehend the extra dimensional aliens all around us. "Scientists" are very much materialistic and can't comprehend occult phenomena."
Oh dear. Yet again, give the monkey a brain and the monkey swears it is the center of the universe.
How do you think human beings actually happened here? You think ETs had no involvement in that at all?
And as far painting all scientists are being unable to "oomprehend the occult", the whole point of science is to try to find models and explanations for what we can detect all around us, whether seen (overt) or unseen (occult or covert).
That's a helluva write off you just made, throwing the whole of science in the trash just because you don't agree with some bits of it because it doesn't match the inside of your own head.
I can understand people have beefs and disagreements with other people, but just stereotyping a whole group as "wrong" when an individual is entirely "right" is just plain monkey person behaviour.
I've already said many times the Anunnaki genetically re-engineered human bodies from what was here before...so they essentially created the current crop of humans. They then stopped being able to manifest here as we fell too far in frequency when they cut off the multidimensional selves of humans. Doesn't mean they ever left. No one said humans are important, but they are important to this experiment here. It was this experiment that was hijacked...humans didn't go elsewhere and do it to them lol. As for the monkey thing...then you wonder why I troll you so hard when you say stupid shit like this. I go by respect and honour and when I have no respect for someone you can bet they won't see my good side little one.
"That's a helluva write off you just made, throwing the whole of science in the trash..."
Dear Pat, please think about why he put the word "scientists" in quotation marks. I'll give you a hint: He's not quoting.
I was quoting him and directing my denial of his statement crystal clear.
To write off the whole of science because you disagree with some individuals past opinion is not smart behavior or sentiment.
There. The point about a scientist is that they can be convinced by logical reasoned argument, while an emotional ranter who cannot see logical reasoned argument cannot do that. They can only be convinced by finding an authority that shows a way to make such a change of opinion for them.
A scientist who can change their opinion is a scientist. Somebody who can never change their opinion is in deniall about reality and somewhat lacking in perception.
Could it be that you just don't understand irony? He put the quotation marks there because he wasn't speaking about true scientists.
Do you know what Scientism is?
Jon Smith
Yes, I am familiar with those concepts.
I am also aware of desperate fatuous pedantry trying to justify unreasonable positions, which would appear to be the basis of your last 2 posts.
Keep on hounding if you like, it does not make your position any more reasonable. Or indeed rational.
I will at least admit that sometimes scientists do the same thing you are doing. Does that make you feel better?
I know you're feeling as if I'm mistreating you somehow, but that's not the case.
Jon was speaking about fake scientists who can't comprehend the occult because they are very materialistic. He wasn't throwing "the whole of science in the trash", but criticized fake scientists. So, you misunderstood him, I called you out, and now you can't admit your mistake.
The reason why I do this is because you are criticizing people for their immature behaviour and "monkey brains" all the time, while in fact it's you who acts like a sulky child.
@Manuel
You're right. That is what it was. I don't discount all science. I even posted a physics snippet not long ago. At some point, let bygones be bygones and start over. Which is what I'm doing now.
"let bygones be bygones and start over"
I'm not personally affected. I write these things because they are on topic. Why do good ETs refuse to have contact with humans? Because the majority of humans still acts like sulky children, not realizing their own responsibility.
➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/71001-why-the-prison-planet-exists
Well, Daz just released a project asking whether the 1997 "Interview with an Alien" is real or hoax.
Personally I think it was a hoax because it's very easy to do the same spooky alien voice with a Digital Signal Processor. Here's an example from the early 90s (you only need to listen to the first minute or so);-
This is what you become once transhumanism takes this world over.