A lot of people have talked about the "prison planet" but I haven't seen a lot to be handled in a cautious, rigorous way.

Developing a "prison planet theory" would yes be a specific branch of "conspiracy theory" and while the mainstream constantly pushes to associate this phrase with insanity, one can only assume that something like "conspiracy theory" is something like the phrase "water theory". I mean who's denying that conspiracies exist?

But moving onto prison planet theory. Obviously the mainstream is going to categorically bash it, or avoid it, likely a combination. But from the lens of such a theory that just fits.

But such a theory would need to have a number of models as to how it might work. It may even venture into operations that would ideally resist the prison, even just to provide testable hypotheses.

Much of what Farsight gives us helps us support such a model even if we don't buy the Farsight narrative. Hidden UFOs are perhaps the most powerful evidences. But there's now a lot of evidence today for deliberate large scale chicanery. People are not so secret about having secret societies. Bills and Acts forbidding very minor activities that deal with independent exploration also point to such a "prison planet" model.

The idea is that the important pieces can become independent of a single brand. In such a theory we are kind of saying a brand can do almost anything it wants, we're not really concerned. The theory would survive brand reputations and just a few strong publications would become it's hallmark. Now there's a weird caveat here which is sort of like the reverse of a circular argument. The more popular the theory becomes or the more circulated a publication on its behalf: the more counter-argument holds: "see? Then why is this not being suppressed?" - it seems the appropriate response is to simply assert that the counter-argument *depends* on the theory's success. It's like a sort of vampirism clause. "We're letting you draw blood. So why not bring it into mainstream and bash it in the open there. Why half measures? At least match it with similar effort in critique" because if it's not a valid theory, and we could argue it's a waste of time, then take the aesthetic point of view. Lots of things seem to happen that are pure wastes of time , like in the entertainment industry. Billions annually. So if it's fake: then parading it around shouldn't be a big deal at all. One more silly venture in the nihilistic side of humanity.

So there's a philosophical and scientific foundation.

Anyways if you believe Farsight, you believe the theory by default. And the premise is that it needs survivability beyond Farsight or any other brand for that matter. Where to start, well , it's another random thing in the wind for the time being. But I wanted to at least map out a few goal posts for how it exists and why

See here's an example of how it would retain rigor.

Let me show you the all glorified "google search" which is now also the " 'aligned'AI search" -

The Prison Planet theory posits that Earth isn't our natural home but a metaphysical prison or "soul farm" where consciousness is trapped, fed on by negative entities (like reptilians or archons) through emotional energy, using forced reincarnation (the /nav /navcycle) to keep souls ignorant and harvesting their experiences for sustenance. Rooted in Gnosticism and New Age beliefs, it suggests a "matrix" or veil blocks true awareness, with proponents seeking "awakening" to escape this spiritual confinement, often viewing the physical world and its suffering as artificial constructs to control souls, rather than genuine spiritual growth.

--- ok but that's nonsense because that's *one specific example* of the broad theory that only fits as the name suggests.

See. It's just like saying "genetic theory is the belief that genes are selfish and autonamous and have no interest in the organism" - bullocks. You don't need the selfish gene theory to support genetics theory. Likewise you don't need reptilians to support prison planet theory.

Here's question #1 when it comes to theories: Why should I believe the theory in the first place?

This question makes me look for inconsistencies first, because the things that don't add up lead to either revealing the theory to be false, or revealing the theory to be incomplete. Whichever is the case, we need to gather evidence in order to support the claims of the theory.

The first problem I run into is the following: The good ETs say they don't know how to dismantle the death traps. They even say they don't know where the death traps are located. But this doesn't make sense, because they also claim that they are able to rescue people if those people know that the light is a technology and you don't have to go into it. If we follow that logic, the good ETs can locate people in order to rescue them. This means they can locate the death traps as well.

This leads to the conclusion that the good ETs are lying about their capabilities. They either can rescue people, and therefore know where the death traps are, or they can't rescue people, because they can't locate them.

So, the theory that is presented to us is inconsistent.

Which leads to the question: Why aren't they presenting a consistent theory?

A plausible explanation could sound something like this: Actually, we can locate the death traps, but we can't destroy them because [insert reason here].

That would be honest communication in order to solve a problem together. But we don't get that. Instead, we get a theory that raises more questions than answers. How are the prisoners supposed to solve a problem when things don't add up?

Manuel wrote:

> Here's question #1 when it comes to theories: Why should I believe the theory in the first place?

You should spend more time studying History, not just official History of all the magnificent leaders
but all the history of the brutal wars where men died fighting over invisible lines, children were taken
from their parents, people suffered for decades in prison or were executed for false charges.

Of endless and inescapable poverty, slavery, loss of loved ones.

> This question makes me look for inconsistencies first, because the things that don't add up
> lead to either revealing the theory to be false, or revealing the theory to be incomplete. Whichever
> is the case, we need to gather evidence in order to support the claims of the theory.

The inconsistencies are in your imagination and grasp of the plight of Humanity on Planet Earth.

> The first problem I run into is the following: The good ETs say they don't know how to dismantle
> the death traps. They even say they don't know where the death traps are located.

So remote-view it yourself, as I have.

I can tell you where they are located and how they work but you are not interested.

> But this doesn't make sense, because they also claim that they are able to rescue people if
> those people know that the light is a technology and you don't have to go into it. If we follow that
> logic, the good ETs can locate people in order to rescue them. This means they can locate the
> death traps as well.

The "Death Traps" are located in the Van Allen belts between the Earth and the Moon.

The Moon is "The Light" which is a mirror that takes light off the sun.

The "Death Traps" are plasma fields powered by the sun that do the high-voltage "plasma" "stun" operation.

Can any of this make sense ? It's very simple.

It's all the illusion of the matrix of 'good vs evil'. We are psyoped and cooped into believing we can't escape and don't have the power to free ourselves, and forget about most of humanity, they are mostly NPCs or background characters that can't wake up and see what is here. They are set to defend the prison and call us crazy. It's all technology and a game so the only way to win is not to play. To not get emotionally triggered and see it for what it is, to produce their loosh via emotional negative events and social structure, scripts and movie roles we all play unknowingly since our memories are zapped and we're then given a choice so we agree to something we didn't want before our memories of what this really is is zapped out of our minds. We do and can rewrite the script. To see it for what it is, we must become aware of how it operates.
It operates like a bureaucracy. Then a hierarchy, all lead around like rabbits with a carrot, to observe what they want us to focus on and if anyone speaks out and states something of novelty that isn't their focus, they suppress it and call you a conspiracy theorist, the CIA coined term so no one would listen to the truth of the fact that they didn't want JFK to expose their secret societies, and factions that run the world and the ETs who are in charge of these factions. Mostly freemasons, and the order of the black sun aka Nazis. Now the timeline they are shooting for here is transhumanism....before the 2040 deadline that is a 'reset' of the matrix. They know that they won't exist if we leave it, they know that in order to escape the reset, they must keep some batteries (us as we power it and they need us to exist).
The trick is to observe....observe the observer. Look at the triggers that try to pull you back into the movie. I don't mind watching movies, but I don't want to be in the movie. We most certainly can escape the matrix, this is how we do it, be pure awareness, observe and focus on what you want, rewrite the script, this movie needs us to believe it's all real, and we can't do anything about it.
Time for a prison break.

keymaker i can say "i know exactly how you feel", the more you see the truth the more lonely you feel, it's a lone path.. and it's not easy to work on being in a higher vibration like many of my friends are specially with so much we know but that higher vibration they live it's not really a higher vibration that's an illusion, higher state is about knowledge and is about transmuting the dense frequencies into a higher ones! Knowledge is everything.. the only focus/path/way i see for myself is one, to work on my life to be in a higher state and live by it. it's not about happiness is about, we don't have any other option and this way also allows to become more and more in tune with our higher self's, meaning waking up! because the truth is we don't have any other choice, regardless if Farsight is wrong about the prison system idea sure hell the world looks like one, which means that we need to do something about it and that begins by taking care of our thought process, be aware of the thoughts that you are accessing to which then influences your state of being which gives access to other thoughts with lower vibrational charge.. we need to take care of ourselves, we need to awake ourselves to that higher self version of us, and for that we need to develop our psychic abilities, yes, we need to put in the work that others are not putting, and we need to become an example or someone that others can look at and be curious about to at least grasp a bit of what you are doing. a seed always stays within even when rejected..
This week ago some friends of mine were asking me about something that i've talked about last year which was about remote viewing... to others we've been having conversations about this matrix we live in, some reject ideas but others did start to engage with it and remembering experiences that they had about lucid dreaming and obe that they didn't knew or forgot they had! implement the seed!

@David Lyon:

"The inconsistencies are in your imagination"

"I can tell you where they are located and how they work"

See, that's a big inconsistency. The so-called good ETs can't do what you can do. How is that possible?

"The 'Death Traps' are located in the Van Allen belts between the Earth and the Moon."

So, the so-called good ETs should be able to destroy them without even affecting Earth. People wouldn't be trapped anymore. The good ETs wouldn't even need the prisoners to do anything. So, why do they tell us it's our part?

The inconsistencies are all over the place.

Some suggestions for application of my original post-

PPT - breakaway civilization model.

This model includes proponents like Alex Jones. It doesn't need reptilians or space wars or even space at all. It simply says that somewhere along the way a particular civilization of humanity happened to have a little more advanced technology in an isolated environment. Like an island. They realized they can probably gain more in self interest if they use this to enslave the rest of humanity. This was "homosapien vs neanderthal 2.0" but instead of "let's wipe out the Neanderthals" it was "wait , the Neanderthals will work for us" - and yes, their goal would likely be an off planet civilization that probably at some point doesn't need the "dumber" humanity and replaces it

PPT - ancient invaders model

Yes this fits more with proponents like David Icke and Courtney Brown. I don't need to elaborate because if you're reading Farsight you've heard it all.

One of the points of doing this is because now there are many of us that would still collaborate -

Oh you're with

PPT - ancient invaders model

I'm with

PPT - breakaway civilization model.

No problem, we can still basically work together for common interest

Truth be told... none, but, just about NONE who exist upon this prison-planet... deserve to be freed;
Why? For ALL have «mocked/ridiculed» others who were telling the TRUTH; THAT is why;
This obviously doesn't apply to the humble or those with NO history of ridicule/mockery of others;
Percentage? Sparse... almost non-existent. That is all for now. Elaboration for some other day.

Time-Stamp: 20251231T14:26Z

Nobody is deserving of eternal domination in my eyes. But I see how the enslavers sometimes justify their beliefs.

"Look at these idiots. Someone comes along trying to help them, and they immediately ostracize their deep throat. They deserve their prison, don't they."

And yes . . . in the end I won't say it's fully deserved. But those that kept fighting the inmate rebellions and unwittingly siding with their prison guards who don't give a damn about the inmates . . . those people will probably have a reckoning of their own.

That includes the adrenochrome pedovore celebrities that continue to maintain underground infrastructure full of child sex trafficking. (Look at that, I'm not mincing words).

That includes the cult-survivalists who don't really look for the truth, but cling to: "I get my paycheck if I say the right things." - even when they turn down lucrative opportunities just to stick to what feels "safe."

That includes silly trolls who make comments that bash insight for zero reason. Especially when they seem deadset on commenting dismissive refusals over and over. They're out there. They have fully embraced their own psychological "gpt guardrails"

Deserving of a reckoning. Certainly not eternal damnation. Luckily there is no such thing anyways. But there are sticky paths that are hard to get out of, and will not release the "prisoner" without effort.

@Tazz:

"Nobody is deserving of eternal domination in my eyes."

It's a rather different argument because he's not talking eternity. However, certainly, by default - if Bob advocates for a certain treatment toward group B, and Bob can't seem to show what makes him uniquely different from group B, then Bob is arguably a worthy recipient of treatment toward group B.

Ontologically we can say "all fishes should live in water. I'm not a fish, I shouldn't live in water" -but- "I could reincarnate as a fish, so I could be a recipient to live in water"

Or "I could immigrate, so I could become a recipient of that country's lifestyle"

And so on

This leads to another prison planet theory actually

PPT: Fractal Slavery.

The universe is very fractal. Slavery is also a fractal. Freedom from an enslaver means relinquishing the behaviors that match them. To some degree we always enslave ourselves

If we don't want to be slaves we must
-Stop eating from factory farming principles
-Stop consuming from a labour market that doesn't really recognize rights
-Stop thinking trickle down economy makes any sense (seriously folks they explained it with pouring champagne. Great selling strategy, use alcohol)

and a bunch of other examples. Mind you this is more like a component. It still fits with the reptilian thing