Dr Judy Wood – Evidence of Breakthrough Energy on 9/11
January 1, 2013

Dr Judy Wood at the Breakthrough energy Movement conference,2012 Holland

Title: The dawn of a new age, evidence of breakthrough energy technology on 9/11

Run time : 2.24.57
Speaker : Dr Judy Wood
Price : Free

If you enjoyed this presentation and want to support GlobalBEM please visit our donate page here https://globalbem.com/info/donate/ and subscribe to our newsletter to get informed about our next conference.

For many years, we have heard that a “free-energy1 device is just around the corner,” but it never seems to come to fruition. Nikola Tesla wanted to give free energy to the world nearly 100 years ago but was afraid it would fall into the wrong hands and be used for destructive purposes. Well, that is no longer just a risk; it has already happened. However, until we understand just how powerful this technology is as well as how powerful the interests are that control it, we won’t see it in general use. We first need to respect what this technology can do, otherwise it would be like leaving a gun cabinet unlocked around children who do not know what guns can do. We also need the world to see what this technology has done. This technology was used to destroy the World Trade Center complex on 9/11/01 and was a demonstration of a new kind of free-energy technology in front of the entire world. As more people around the world recognize this, the less power the controlling interests will have. And if the entire world knows that free-energy technology exists, individuals can openly build their own devices and share their designs with others. It won’t be a secret!

BIO
Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics, 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).

http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Part 2 is of the Pentagon attack. Dick Allgire has noted that censored from the release was Dick's identifying the flag of the submarine that launched the missile and too, the name on the badge of the person that pressed the button to launch it. Dick is quite good.

Hint: rhymes with slip-rail.

I can certainly see censoring for YouTube... but now that there is FarsightPrime ... a subscription only site ...

Let's see the Director's Cut version - no censorship.

Remember on part 2 when the remote viewer deduced a missile, he wrote on the whiteboard the word "Popeye". I googled that and "Popeye" is the name of an Israeli cruise missile.

For "no censorship" you might have to look elsewhere or create your own group. The viewers here are tied to the US gov and they agree with the censorship.

Courtney is not about 100% pure truth. (But who is?) He says he is driving a psyop BASED on truth. This is very different. It is an intel weaponization of truth called "DISCLOSURE". It is fun but it has a specific agenda.

Courtney is a mainstream teacher and a hardcore "statists" (not a libertarian) and he praises the US intel community in almost every video... a community to which he belongs at least as an "asset".

This is clearly NOT Wikileaks.

Courtney appears suddenly in 1995 when RV becomes public... and his job is to act as a happy promoter AND gatekeeper of RV. Today one might even say "cult" leader.

Courtney never mentions Israel negatively (he loves Israel and the Mossad) and continues (until today) to pretend Arab terrorists with box cutters were involved. (He is not a 911 truther and he sill believed in the official version until he did the RV project: he was very surprised by the results.)

Dick and Daz are real truthers with libertarian sympathies. Dick just hired Greg Reese from Infowar in their RV group (Future Forcasting Group). They broke away from Courtney after their projects on 911 and JFK. They are not comfortable with the Soul Trap interpretation.

But even they follow a rule not to act against the interests of the US gov.

I'm about to get wild with this one. Did farsight claim at one point that good et had the ability to travel in time and go forward in time? Then surely if that is the case, could they be able to retrieve evidence from the conspirators, or can they be able to retrieve something to display the conspiracy, and plant it in front of somebody to reveal at a later point?

If 9/11 was a conspiracy as told in the Farsight briefing videos, then we don't know the people behind it all and we don't know who they are. Having suspicions isn't the same as having evidence. The attacks always seemed to have a hidden side to me. In the end, however, what we ended up with was just speculation about how the buildings got brought down, what materials were used, and who was responsible for planning and executing it. As far as the demolition crews and the planner are concerned, we do not have the names of either. There is a conspiracy, though.

There is a lot more that can be done here. The hijackers met with who to plan this event, where did the demolition crew and the planners meet to discuss this event, what facility and where did they discuss it. In the aftermath of the material being planted in the building, where did they go? It is possible to see faces and personalities through the use of remote viewing techniques? Would it be possible for us to see the vehicles as they travel in. Does the material used in the demolition event have the ability to be viewed remotely. I would like to know what the motives were for doing this. Stuff like that

9/11 was solved more than 15 years ago without the use of Remote Viewing.

Many books have been written and many documentaries have been made.

Remote viewing is fun.

It allows people to re-visit the topic differently and confirm the deception.