Hi,

Along with Covid I have spent hundreds of hours looking into 9-11 and as this mystery deals specifically with Flight 77, I will attempt to shed information on that topic although I give you two more that would be interesting later on in this article.. On 9-11, 2001 when I saw two buildings fall at almost the rate of gravity, my conspiratorial radar went off.

Courtenay, you are right, not even Tom Cruise could fly a jumbo jet just feet above the ground into an object 77 feet high. Hmm. Flight 77 flew into the Pentagon that was 77 feet high and at 77 degrees west latitude. Quite the coincidence! The upward turbulence from air compression would make the jet virtually unmanageable. How this General Stubblebine bought the Keystone cops version of the story that terrorists banned from flying single engine Cessnas with one hour on a flight simulator could pull off a stunt that not even top military pilots could exact, is beyond credulity. Just as credulous is how this guy became a General! And why not just fly the plane straight down into the top of the Pentagon. The flying would have been infinitely easier and the damage much greater.

What a coincidence that the area that the Boeing 757 hit was specifically reinforced for Terrorist attack. And what a coincidence that the day before Donald Rumsfeld announced that they had lost 2.3 trillion dollars and just couldn't figure out where it went. (Maybe someone left it in a drawer on the opposite side of the building.) By the way, several records including possible answers the lost money went down with Building Seven.

Where was the damage to the lawn in front of the attack sight? And where are the ginormous holes left by two Pratt Whitney, 5 ton engines travelling at 400 mph! Not even windows were smashed within the wingspan of the wings.

It's absurd in spades!!

I have often wonder what happened to the passengers. on Flight 77 Sickening and fascinating at the same time. The blatant disregard for the lives of Flight 77 passengers with these psychopaths continues to amaze me.

Consequently I have a couple other search items wrt 9-11:

1) Did planes actually hit the Twin Towers or were there just explosives. I do not believe any planes hit the towers. They were later CGI'd.
2) What happened to the passengers in Flights 11 and 150.

Courtenay, you asked what the purpose of 9-11 was. I believe just good old terror was one objective. It raised the paranoia of the world a notch just like the Scam Plan Panic-demic aka Covid raised it another notch. When people are afraid they are much more manageable

I believe these were strategic long-in-the-planning steps for the New World Order. Both 9-11 and Covid were studies by the elite in herd management in addition to other motives.

Thanks for pushing the boundaries of our knowledge and going where no remote viewers have gone before.
You've got me tempted to give this a try.

Richard.

RV is all in the tasking.

One good RV project would be to look at the infamous 5 DANCING ISRAELIS that were arrested in 9/11. DEtained for about 70 days and shipped back to Occupied Palestine.

They were working for a company called URBAN MOVING SYSTEM who disappeared very soon later. Their logo printed on their white vans was a big plane flying, with the twin towers in the background. Very cool.

These people most probably part of the team who installed the explosives in the towers. They had "artists" passes. This is very well documented.

Farsight knows very little about the topic. They are tourists playing. They are not solving anything.

9/11 happened 23 years ago. That's like 1/4 of a century! It was solved around 2008. So many books written by so many good people.

Everybody thought Obama would do something. But on the contrary he worked hard to clean up the big mess of the people before him: Bush, Rumsfield, Cheney & the Gang of USA/Israeli citizens that were the Administration.

In the old South one might use the word : "house nigger". The nice word is : "continuity of governement" (CoG). But who care about words, overall Obama did a great job.

After him it was just propaganda over propaganda. Infiltration of truthers. Noise. Division.

The passengers of Flight 77 are not dead. If they ever existed.

We know at least one of them did not die and changed her identity and physicial appearence.

This is a good one-page summary of what we know about Flight 77. The fake phone calls and so on:

https://911research.wtc7.net/planes/attack/flight77.html

Barbara Olson's call NEVER HAPPENED. According to the FBI it lasted 0 seconds. So Ted Olson lied about his wife calling him. By the way: he was a member of the Bush gov.

He married another woman a year later. As insane as it sounds, this woman is Barbara who went through INSANE surgery.

The new wife has no past.. born in the same town, went to the same school, has the same height, the same hand moves, the same hairline... But the face is different... So crazy it makes it unbelievable... and this protects the story.

Also, Yeme and Courtney mentionned the possibiity of terrorists in the plane. That is odd and somehow misleading. Because it is not corrobrated by any other RV or anything else.

Nobody ever found a valid proof of terrorists in the 4 planes. The only proofs we have are this (fake) call from Barbara who introduces the idea of Arabs and box cutters. And the infamous clean passports allegedly found in the rubbles of NYC :)

"They are not solving anything."

Well, they saw that the plane didn't hit the Pentagon. We already knew that, but it's good to have additional RV data.

They also saw that the plane was shot out of the sky. That's new data enabling us to investigate further.

Focus 4 is also very interesting. It looks like something happened not according to plan, and because of that, they had to improvise. I'm under the impression that the plane was supposed to hit the Pentagon, just like the other planes hit the Twin Towers. Maybe someone shot Flight 77 to sabotage the plan? The decision maker than decided to use a rocket to hit the Pentagon, which was a bad decision because it raises questions that make the cover-up more difficult.

"Flight 77 flew into the Pentagon that was 77 feet high and at 77 degrees west latitude. Quite the coincidence!"

They are OCD when it comes to hidden symbolism like this. Could be the reason why the decision maker decided to stuck with the narrative that the plane hit the Pentagon.

"Did planes actually hit the Twin Towers or were there just explosives. I do not believe any planes hit the towers. They were later CGI'd."

I don't think so, because they could have CGI'd the plane hitting the Pentagon, so why didn't they?

I always thought that the second plane was advanced hologram tech because it was all grey with no visible American Airlines coloring. But I just watched a couple different views of it on YouTube; the video from the news helicopter looked like really crappy CGI, there is a white coloring all around the plane and the plane looks exactly the same thru all the frames and the dimensions of the wings and engines seems weird.

The video of the first plane by the firefighter documentary crew looks like the wings disappear in the frame before it hits the building. Maybe they were so arrogant they brought in an amateur CGI guy.

@San Marcus

Do you mean this one? The clip of the first plane crashing can be found at 3:19, but it's very bad quality, because they decided to use video footage that has been recorded in interlaced mode without applying an interlaced filter. You can barely see any details. Is there a better quality version somewhere?

"Why use CGI if you can use a real plane and kill even more innocent people?"

You're not understanding how projects like this [could] work with a professional team. The team is split up into planners and ground guys. The planners always think that the ground guys are complete screwups and morons. It could be Seal Team 6 on the ground, and their planners will still think they need to design their plan so that those buffoonish Seals don't screw it up. Common points of failure are removed from the plan. Entrusting the entire plan to one or two pilots will be viewed as way too risky. Planners have a saying, "Something ALWAYS goes wrong."

A good example of this thinking is the failed American response to the Iranian embassy hostage situation in 1980. Several different American units tried to utilize different routes and strategies to converge on a staging point in the Iranian desert. The thinking was that several of the units might be shot down or crashed on their route in, but that enough of a force would make it to the desert to push on towards the embassy.

Also there is the possibility of having to deal with screwups as they happen or after they happen. Perhaps they didn't plan to need CGI, but a screwup happened and someone said, "Hey my cousin does some CGI work!"

The first clip in this video is what I analyzed for the first plane.

Regarding the first clip by San Marcus:

It looks like an explosion appears in one frame when the plane's nose hits the building, but the next frame the explosion is gone, and with it the left wing. But: This obviously is an upscale with a heavy deinterlace filter applied. Upscales and filters can cover or remove compression artifacts, depending on how they work. To verify, we would need to look at the original unscaled interlaced footage. Everything that is scaled or filtered doesn't prove anything, because when the video is edited, how do you know that nothing else has been changed?

Regarding the second clip by Jon:

This is very bad quality with lots of compression artifacts. I don't see anything unusual that couldn't be explained away with the compression algorithm, which in 2001 would most likely be the H.263 standard, which is really bad at low bitrates.

If we want to be scientific, we need the original unadulterated footage, or at least a really good quality with as less artifacts as possible.

Perhaps the Frechmen's documentary has original footage of at least the first explosion (I can't remember if they got the second on video). Since they edited their own footage, maybe the clip is still unaltered in their final version unless it was altered in post-production.