Is there any issue with regard to Farsight and releasing information that may impact or compromise matters of National Security. For example, on GAIA TV "Into the Vortex, with Jimmy Church" Michah Hanks of The Debrief commented to this effect that our government will probably *never* release certain types of information partly due to national security concerns surrounding our international threats (I am paraphrasing) -- that doing so may reveal items of sources and methods and/or compromise us in some fashion.

This got me to post here tonight and see what everyone, including Farsight, feels about this.

My gut reaction was that it's a partially valid concern -- I say partial, because I am personally in favor of complete, unfettered disclosure. Period. But now I wonder if Farsight may have been "warned" by our military not to "go there" on certain items that may impact the above -- and if so, Farsight would not be able to comment. I am just speculating, I'm not suggesting it's happened.

We are seeing an increase in soft disclosure, I'm not sure there's much choice now with our established institutions, it's a mess and it can't be kept secret forever. It's my hope that we do in fact have a complete, unfettered disclosure that will trigger what Courtney (including Harvey) have discussed.

I'm curious of anyone's thoughts and perspective on this. We may see other "hearings" in our gov't and we know there have been closed hearings to handle the classified portion of this, which I imagine has a lot to do with the subject of this post.

Thanks!

The disclosure topic is very complex, the knowledge of an extraterrestrial presence on earth would be an ontological threat to any government. The sociological implications are huge, from questioning the legitimation of religions and governments to psychological effects from the breakdown of the world-view of many people. There is nothing like a "soft" disclosure -it will be a series of huge events, which will change our societies completely. We should be aware of the "new Religion" which will form out of this. The ETs do not come for resources, like gold, etc., they could mine asteroids and they do not come for slaves, as they have robots. They also do not come for genetic resources, they already have them.
ETs would come for something else: for our minds.

Ideologies (religions) tend to intensify:
- expansion pressure through above-average
Reproduction, aggression, missionization ...
- Mobilization through higher motivation,
renunciation tolerance, in-group cooperation ...
Therefore extraterrestrial visitors are
probably religious hardliners on
mission march!
[Vaas, R.: Fear of fanatics: Why Stephen Hawking is right and we should not contact extraterrestrial intelligence.
Journal of Cosmology, ed. 7, pp. 1792-1799 (2010)]

They come to spread their own control system. This will be and has always been a "religious" system. FS data and the works of other researchers like e.g. Mauro Biglino (https://www.youtube.com/c/MauroBiglinoOfficialChannel/videos) show that.
So what will be the "new Religion"? Will it be the KI transhumanist agenda? Or a "we are all connected" esoteric thing? Maybe both somehow combined? -I don't know. But I am sure that somebody will try to use the disclosure-disruptions to force or trick his agenda upon us. This may even be valid for both, "evil" and "benign" ETs.
We should be aware of this.

Dangerous Knowledge UFO Science and the Last Humans - Dr. Alexander Wendt

Scroll the black screen after the presentation to see the (also very interesting) discussion

Driving this into a Farsight direction: keeping in mind why we are here, in a prison system that is surrounded by a control technology of "death traps" that have done considerable damage to us all. With the Orion syndicate (et al, including reptilians) being complicit -- I maintain zero sympathy for them, for the kinds of people they are and of their exploits of others.

My initial query was from the perspective of someone in special access programs, people who actually "can" affect information release -- our politicians are just placeholders, IMHO, they don't have the power here in this matter. But we also have to consider that many of the SAPs secrets have been divvied out to contractors so they are now also "corporate secrets". It's complicated -- Bigelow is right in there with them.

I sense that any public disclosure of the sort "we" would desire here would be very complex, complicated and involve many parties.

But to the national security concerns, I think there is healthy paranoia that our enemies in the world could derive information from the data we could present that would reveal our capabilities and other information that could potentially leave us vulnerable -- that was my take-away from the Debrief discussion I mentioned.

The enemy: this is what they always use as an excuse to keep the hotstuff secret. Putin and the Chinese...
But I think their main fears are the disruptive effects of a sudden public disclosure. They would have to confess that they lied about the most important question of mankind. This alone would be reason enough to doubt the legitimacy of their governance. The people would start to question everything else, if they get to know about backengineering programs. They know that they cannot keep their ET secret for ever, because of the internet, mobile cameras, whistleblowers, etc.
So they need an exit strategy and that is what we see now. They pass the ball over to science and media to prevent a sudden "grass root event" which might delegitimise their position of power.

Exosociology for example as a new science just starts from zero. There is no question that the "first contact" might already have happened on a secret level, this would still be a conspiracy theory:

Scenarios of a first contact with extraterrestrials
1) The signal scenario
2) The artifact scenario
3) The direct contact scenario

Evidence problem
- For all three scenarios, the following is true: they presuppose collective evidence.
- In reality, however, a first contact could take place in many different ways without without leading to unambiguous interpretations/knowledge.
- Signal scenario: "WOW 2.0" Mankind receives a signal for a short time that looks like it could be an artificial signal. However, a natural source cannot be ruled out.
- Artifact scenario: An extraterrestrial artifact is passing through our solar system, but we are unable to obtain sufficient data to come to any definite conclusions.
- Direct contact scenario: An extraterrestrial spacecraft enters our solar system and observes the Earth but systematically evades attempts to study it.

Source Dr. Andreas Anton, IGPP Freiburg Exosociology: Alien Intelligences and the Consequences of a first contact, IFEX Workshop 2022: "SETI and the Consequences"

I guess most of us are familiar with disclosure fighters in the UAP/UFO community like Jeremy Corbell, George Knapp, Louis Elizondo, Joe Murgia etc

They are famous for producing documentaries on the UAP phenomenon, Bob Lazar, Area S4, talking on Joe Rogan and so on.

So what I heard is that untill very recently whistleblowers who wanted to come out were afraid because the law could prosecute them to the fullest. It seems right now there is so called 'WhitleBlower Protection' legislation being audited to go through the House and Senate for approval.

If they succeed in getting this done, things might change very quickly. And it seems it's very likely it's going to be done very soon, because they already have been many whistleblowers who talked behind closed doors and sessions with House and Senate members, and they got convinced this change should be done.

So basicly all these whistleblowers are saying: we are not talking officially or on the record, until we know for certain we are not going to be 'JFK'ED' by the CIA or whatever agency who don't want us to talk.

So if you guys want us to talk, fix legislation that protects us, and then we will come out. Allegedly this will deal with many more workers of S4 where there are reverse engineering these space crafts for decades.

So basicly it is expected that much more detail about Area 51 and S4, of even secret alien communication that has been going on with the military, is going to be revealed starting this January.

It make sense that these hundreds of maybe thousands of people that have been working on these various secret location have lots more to add to Bob Lazars testimonies. He just had a small view of the total operation. And it never made sense to me why nobody else came out. But ofcourse in many ways it does make sense, since Bob was lucky to be alive after many attempt that were made on his life.

It's all about safety for these people. And being able to share what they know for the benefit of humanity, without fear of consequences. Maybe this legislation event is even related to what FS has been saying, that the military need to be informed about what the B'ET's are trying to do. So if they believe this information by now, then the military might as well have given their approval to play this disclosure out through official ways by letting Congress and Senate introduce whitleblower protection. And by that strategy they can slowly release more and more information about disclosure. Not even by choice to share this in openness, but because they have no choice and this is the only way that they can save themselves.