Is there any issue with regard to Farsight and releasing information that may impact or compromise matters of National Security. For example, on GAIA TV "Into the Vortex, with Jimmy Church" Michah Hanks of The Debrief commented to this effect that our government will probably *never* release certain types of information partly due to national security concerns surrounding our international threats (I am paraphrasing) -- that doing so may reveal items of sources and methods and/or compromise us in some fashion.
This got me to post here tonight and see what everyone, including Farsight, feels about this.
My gut reaction was that it's a partially valid concern -- I say partial, because I am personally in favor of complete, unfettered disclosure. Period. But now I wonder if Farsight may have been "warned" by our military not to "go there" on certain items that may impact the above -- and if so, Farsight would not be able to comment. I am just speculating, I'm not suggesting it's happened.
We are seeing an increase in soft disclosure, I'm not sure there's much choice now with our established institutions, it's a mess and it can't be kept secret forever. It's my hope that we do in fact have a complete, unfettered disclosure that will trigger what Courtney (including Harvey) have discussed.
I'm curious of anyone's thoughts and perspective on this. We may see other "hearings" in our gov't and we know there have been closed hearings to handle the classified portion of this, which I imagine has a lot to do with the subject of this post.