ehh, humbly disagree, there's plenty of other views out there who do that, for extra curricular and professional means. only problem is, it's not very entertaining that's why there's just not much of a demand for it. NOW don't get me wrong in my lack of sentiment, i know that's an important topic and that's a socially "impolite" thing to say but idc, it is what it is, it's my truth. we SUBSCRIBE to farsight prime to be entertained by the mysteries of the highly esoteric, suspicious/ suppressed and disputed concepts/topics relating to life/ death, conscience and SO much more, that expand our awareness to new heights and tear our belief systems apart. not to find little timmy tickle caught in a pedo ring.. sorry for the rant but i think their doing a great job on trying to ENTERTAIN us.

I don't think in this forum, one should be careful about being "politically correct." I do understand the need for entertainment as much as expressing oneself freely from the societal dogma. I do believe it to be the healthy part of the human experience.

If you may, would you be kind enough to share sources on other viewer/reader perusing missing-person cases? For me, in my half-baked search on the internet, had trouble finding such websites or remote-viewer venturing that direction.

Thank you

Daz smith did a missing 411 case

Yes i would like this also - we need to help the lost and understand the unknown. The viewing needs full police coverage and acceptance.

God Bless you. Help them.

I want to see the case of Jon Bennie solved can all of you view get Psychics if you have to, But get names and

JonBenet Ramsey case solved by Reverse Speech! (Starts at 8:30) I find that many want to know the truth, but when you provide evidence people are not interested. They want to keep holding on to old, outdated ideas. Like the planes going through a steel & concrete structure. What a laughable joke. Can't we think for ourselves?
More amusing is some of the floors had no concrete walls! What disinfo. I provide evidence to back up my opinions. Some of the "highjackers" were even found and interviewed after the event.
And we still keep spreading the same bullshit story.

https://reversespeechradio.libsyn.com/wguest-rachel-pierce-11-reverse-speech-radio-episode-32-is-brought-to-you-by-crime-trauma-scene-cleaners-crime-scene-cleanersca

Anastasia

I read first 3 or 4 books need to get caught up that was in 2008

His daughter is on facebook

Or were there really any passengers?

Well we know that one of the passengers on Flight was Barbra Olson, a TV commentator, and wife of Theodore Olson, the Solicitor General of the US. Hard to believe she would be silenced if she was alive, and also harder to believe that her husband would be a willing party to her being sacrificed for Dick Cheny's Illuminati plans.

Hi Vaidas, I agree with you that the wingmakers would be an excellent rv target. It would really be interesting to find out if the wingmakers' story is real as presented in the first website.

I came upon the wingmakers material after the changes that you mentioned above had been made, and I definitely got the impression that the story was changed from the original one but it still contained some elements of truth.

Thank you for posting the link of the original material. I looked for it way back and could not find it. I usually check the glossary of stories to get a quick sense of what the story is about, and to see if it resonates with me. The glossary of the original 2 interviews is very impressive and rings true me. I have the modified version of the WM, I will check the glossary (if there is one) and compare it to the one from your link.

3 buildings where demolitioned, Building 7 being what they call the third. And the planes where CGI'd in. All footage w/ planes in them came from just 3 news agencies, any other footage shows no planes:

There were not any concrete walls in the WTC buildings above the 5th floor. The upper stories were build with a center core of 43 hollow steel tubes, some measuring over 3' X2' with 4" thick walls. The floors were thick concrete slabs connected to the central core of steel tubes, and the outside edges were supported by the aluminum skin.

Once the planes penetrated the thin aluminum skin, there was virtually no resistance to the planes momentum unless it hit the central columns. That is why the holes are on two sides. There was no need fo rthe planes to cut the rebar, as it is in the floor concrete. Any interior walls would be of cold rolled steel studs (known as tin can studs) with sheetrock. The interior walls were not structural and supported only their own weight.

BTW, it is possible for a plane to cut rebar in a concrete wall. As a long time contractor, I can tell you that rebar is not a continuous welded mat inside the concrete. It is made up of 10-20' legths that are secured with tie wire. The bond is not very strong. The rebar are overlapped 2-4', not welded together. Given sufficient force, the rebar will stretch and pull out of the concrete like an ingrown hair.

In the 1940s, a B-17 bomber impacted the Empire State building. Rebar in the walls was cut, and that was from only a 10,000 poung airplane going 200 MPH. The WTC biuldings were hit by planes weighing approx 140,000 pounds and traveling 300+ mph.

William, sorry for being so stupid. Thank you for your expert analysis. Shouldn't there be then large chunks of concrete slabs falling to the ground?
In this picture, the bottom part of the building is still intact. How did it lose its structural integrity?

Also, the 47-storey WTC 7 was across the street from WTC 1, & WTC 2. It was not reported as being hit by a plane. Your expert analysis of its destruction would be helpful.

Where is the pile of rubble that fell to the ground?

Thank you

Hello Chris, did you say 3 buildings were destroyed? How did you miss The Marriott Hotel, a 22 storey building?

or
WTC 5 & 6

" />

" />

Look at a photo of the Twin Tower's I-Beam core, it's huge. A plane would have to clip a corner to miss it.

Second, look at a photo of a jumbo-jet that hit a large bird. Keep in mind when 3 media agencies CGI'd the planes into the footage they even made a mistake and left a frame of the nose of a plane emerging from the back-side completely intact.

First, you are not so stupid, you just are curious because the explanations dont pass the smell test.

The WTC 1 & 2 lost their structural integrity because the central columns were cut in locations other than where the planes hit. There are pictures available that show the columns with 45 degree thermite cuts in full view. Once the central steel tube columns were cut at an angle, they could not maintain the integrity of the building. How and by whom they were cut is already known. The truth always comes out eventually.

There were concrete slabs in the pile of debris after the collapse. The pile was 10 stories high. Since most pictures that were published were taken while standing on the top of the pile, the public was led to believe that the pile was at street level. The buildings had a 6 story deep basement, that also contained much of the debris.

WTC 7 was demolished in a controlled demolition, which was pre-set. The plane that was supposed to crash into that building never took off. Did you know that there were several other suicide teams that were to be on other flights, but the flights were delayed in takeoff and boarding, and were unable to take off before the general grounding of all aircraft was declared? The plan was for at least 8 planes. Look for links detailing that there were middle eastern men in Boston, and NY that were angry and demanded that the flight board and take off and not comply with the grounding that happened after the WTC was hit. It is speculated that those other 4 planes were to crash into WTC 7, Capital Building, White House, and perhaps the Statue of Liberty.

The other WTC buildings were destroyed due to heavy damage from WTC 1 & 2's falling debris. The foundations were also compromised in those buildings since all seven WTC buildings were built in the same coffer dam and were connected underground.

You see, the ground at the WTC was formerly part of the river. The ragged shore of Manhatten was straightened over the centuries by infilling the inlets with soil. In order to build the WTC buildings, the NY Port Authority, who owns the buildings and land, had to construct a coffer dam large enough and deep enough to keep out the East River. In short, they built the buildings in a bathtub. The buildings then shared a common foundation and were connected below the street level. There was even a train and bus station there.

The collapse fo the WTC towers then compromised the other building foundations within the coffer dam, resulting in their being condemned and torn down.

I actually posted the 'nose intact' footage above under September Clues Part 1"

There was not any shortage at the manufacturers. Toilet paper, like many other commodities, has a stable demand for its different types and varieties. 60% of all toilet paper is made on dedicated machines for residential use, and another 40% is made on different dedicated machines for commercial use. The machines are not convertable. Residential TP is multiply, softer, and on traditional sized rolls. Commercial TP is single ply, and on very large rolls.

The manufacturing output and demand is relatively stable year after year. The shortage came because the demand for commercial TP dropped and the redidential TP demand soared. SInce the machines could not be converted from residential to commercial, the manufacturers were only able to go 24/7 instead of 12hours for 5 days.

Similar issues persist for foods. Bananas, for instance. The largest bananas are shipped in bunches to the stores, but the less desireable smaller bananas are removed from the banana stalk one by one and sent to schools for student lunches. Since the schools were closed, the bananas were left to rot in landfills.

Many foods are shipped to restaurants, but rarely purchased for use in the home. Salad greens, olives, garbonzo beans, baby corn are just a few examples. They were still produced, but sent to landfills, uneaten.

Yes!!! AGREE

I'm interested in that ship and purpose

I too would like to find out: who built it, when, why, how what is it for/does it do? Earthfiles with Linda Howe reports on it, and I've heard of it from other sources.

Enlightenment. Then decide where to reincarnate to gain more knowledge or come back again to help us all.

https://ronsorg.ch/en/

Sounds good to me!!