setting aside 1 - 1 1/2 hrs for an informational vid is a bit much to ask of busy ppl; Mr Brown, thinking.. shortening your intro and having the RVs, with clips of their session, provide a summary of their perceptions; you can still have the long versions available; the summaries can cover all of the perceptions, so we wouldn't be missing anything

Honestly I think this request weak. Would you ask a film producer to condense his movie into a 20 minute show? Summarizing the data sets IS how you would miss things. Try watching the video in 15 minute increments or simply skim them if you are only interested in getting prices of the information presented.

*pieces

Dear Peej.. these are not movies, they are informational vids; maybe you have the time, but when I see things like this, quite a bit more ponderous than they need to be, I get a little impatient.. maybe you enjoy spending the time, I don't

I often watch UTube vids at faster speeds, but having watched most of the FarSight vids, it seems to me that the viewer(s) doing a comprehensive summary would be appreciated by the audience

Courtney's intros definitely need condensed. He should give the targets FIRST, then just the info we need to understand the remote view data. Then a single sentence referring people to a video if they want to know what remote viewing is & the scientific process of blinding they use. Put all the conclusion at the end, as long as you want! Waiting 20 minutes to get into the remote viewing is unpleasant at times...

However, I they should definitely record the paper sessions & incorporate highlights of those into the video movies.

Please keep as is.

I realise concentration spans are decreasing but all that will happen is that everything will be shortened to 10-second sound bites like we get on the News.

People that cannot concentrate for 90 minutes or however long need to pause the video and come back later.

There certainly is a lot of information presented with much of it very confronting in terms of challenging our long held beliefs. These are much like University Lectures of stuff we need to know but is difficult to hear. Some other video's, where it's a three hour lecture, it literally takes me a week to watch, but they are the best video's ever.

So I do agree that watching some of them in one sitting can be challenging.

"Losing Detail" is not the answer as far as I'm concerned. I'd suggest that viewers break them into smaller pieces. I think over time, once this becomes a 'collection', the problem will then become indexing and finding a particular word, phrase or concept that you remembered being said and then finding it in an index.

So I'm really in favour of preserving the Detail and Quality of the works.