Courtney revealed something very interesting in the video posted on this page:

https://www.farsightprime.com/forums/general/53737-black-pilled

He said that Farsight's 9/11 project had problems when Dick Allgire and Daz Smith were blocked until he wrote in a 'third party protocol' borrowing an ET mind to circumvent the block. When I heard this I jumped in astonishment.

The target was finally acquired. The information obtained then seemed to verify the 'mainstream conspiracy theory'. Explosives carefully laid beforehand explaining the squibs seen in videos of the collapse were now identified as pre-laid explosives by Daz Smith etc. This all tied in with some eyewitness accounts from the time before the event of stange workmen busy around the complex.

But who could have placed such a sophisticated psychic block on a human driven event?

There is another layer to the 9/11 story. Dr Judy Woods, a forensic engineer, revealed that thousands of tons of steel and concrete and filing cabinets and porcelain and so on simply could not be accounted for in the little that remained on the World Trade Center site. Remember it was not just the Towers and WT7 but the entire complex that was wiped out: WT 1-7. What little was left at Ground Zero made no sense.

You will need to read Dr.Judy Woods work to see if her version of events makes sense to you. I am convinced it is a better version than the simple explosives approach. The claim is that whether brought down by planes or explosives or whatever there should have been wreckage hundreds of feet tall full of twisted metal, human remains, filing cabinets, bathroom porcelain which does not burn away to nothing and so on.

This idea was met with ridicule and hostility by the 9/11 'Truthers'. Dr. Woods and Andrew Johnson (a UK alternative researcher originally on the 9/11 commission for truth team) claim that a new and undisclosed directed energy weapon was used for a process they called 'Dustification'. They further claimed that the explosives theory was a misdirection to hide this new form of extreme weapon.

It is still possible that explosives were laid to misdirect future researchers.

Now following this line of thought it can be guessed who might have had the ability and a motive to use psychic blocking; ET with or without human involvement now seem to be the likely perpetrators. A new and terrifying weapon was demonstrated in plain sight. Was it a warning or a sales pitch? For me the question is:
was a double psychic block in place? Did the dissolution of the first block merely lead Dick and Daz to layer one - the cover story?

This is important because the protocol for getting past blocks may just lead to a 'honeypot'. You do this in IT, make something attractive and difficult to break into so the invaders waste their time believing they have broken into something important and possibly leave a track back to their identity or to their contacts. Spy stories talk about marked notes - you let something out and see where it turns up. Honeypots are great for this.

So I wonder if another crack at 9/11 with a new unblocking protocol may develop the story further.

Perhaps it is worth experimenting on other targets with differing unblocking protocols to see if any evidence of honeypots exists. So task a sensitive target to several viewers - a control without an unblocking protocol and two with differing unblocking protocols for example. We know about screen memories so why not screen RV results? This was hinted at in the Ashtar Command movie.
---------------------
A final point on the 9/11 story not much mentioned and altogether more prosaic - the complex lost $200m a year. The owner had purchased a white elephant but he insured it for $2.3 billion against destruction by terrorists. After 9/11 he claimed that as it had been hit twice he had been the victim of 2 attacks and should receive $4.6 billion. Please note I am working from memory - the final settlement was $3.8 billion as I recall. I do not know if the City of NY then bought the site to create the memorial. Was the owner the author of the event, a party to the event, or controlled in some way?

9/11 is a rabbit hole of epic proportions whatever way you look at it.

At what point in the video does Courtney say the things you mentioned? It's 3.5 hours long.

Allgire mentioned a physical blockage from a faraday cage and shielding at the end of part 1 of the 911 project video, but because of the edit it's not clear what he was looking at or where. Just before, he was viewing some sort of operations room full of deadly serious military and civilian people pushing around pieces on a simulated battlefield. Outside was a huge circular antenna and his feeling was that it was somewhere in the DC area and that it had to do with the military or NSA. The NSA spy base in Sugar Grove, WV had two such AN/FRD-10 antennas, but the layout of the AN/FLR-9 antenna of Elmendorf, AFB outside of Anchorage, AK matches the drawing better. Another AN/FRD-10 is at the Center for Security Forces outside Chesapeake, VA and there are supposedly several smaller FRD-13 at other bases but I'm not sure which ones.

Heinz Pommer has a theory that aligns with what the viewers saw regarding the main destructive event, the vacuum cleaner sized cylinder underground where "metal turns to vapor".

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EJdRKfRDe4Rq/

In the 60's when people were trying to come up with more useful nuclear devices arose the idea of a slow-burn nuclear bomb that would work like a portable volcano if buried underground. It could be used to terraform mountains, create underground chambers, or demolish buildings by melting down their central columns. The months of volcanic heat, the radiation, and the subsequent bizarre "memorials" consisting of ugly pits coated with running water are entirely consistent with a small buried volcano-nuke and mitigation of the long term radiation at 'ground zero'. Blocks of explosives could have been used to destroy particular pieces of the building higher up.

With regard to the various ideas about nano thermite and dustification, I'm not so sure. The outer skin of the building was aluminum stuck directly on iron beams, a terrible idea from a corrosion perspective and likely to make flakes of iron oxide and aluminum naturally in a demolition. The concrete for the floors was supplied by the mafia, notorious for skimping on expensive things like cement binder leaving the floors prone to disintegrating without much effort at all. An entire parking garage in Boston made of mafia-crete pancaked to the ground when a crane bumped the roof. The twin towers were not only ugly and obsolete, but likely a disaster waiting to happen. I'm not surprised that rather than wait for disaster to happen naturally, unscrupulous people made it happen for maximum personal and political advantage.

Another interesting hit was at 1:22:00 in Farsight 911 part 2 where Allgire views the advanced preparations related to the collapse of the north tower. He sees a man in business attire with frameless glasses and a fancy standing desk, a member of PNAC, who advises the president, with a high pitched nasally Illinois accent, who is an icy cold evil operator. It was highly unusual to have a standing desk over 20 years ago, but this man had one:

https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/donald-rumsfeld-fingers-his-standup-desk-in-white-house-office-116-as-picture-id515403310?s=594x594

Pause Farsight 911 p2 at 1:31:24 for the drawing of the evil mastermind planning the tower collapse.

Resemblance?

Another interesting thing was that the viewers saw a missile hit the pentagon rather than a plane. Researchers already knew the flight data recorder info that was physically inconsistent with a real flight, but nobody could say what actually caused the destruction. Smith and Allgire both viewed a missile rather than a plane. Allgire viewed a submarine launched missile and heard the name 'Popeye' for no apparent reason. Only one country does actually name its submarine launched cruise missiles Popeye. One day after the aforementioned owner of a custom standing desk announced that $2.4 trillion of pentagon expenditures could not be accounted for, a Popeye-like miissile apparently killed off the auditing staff while the man hid on the opposite side of the Pentagon. He then went out and helped for an hour picking up wreckage despite being Secretary of Defense.

The 911 plot was probably not cooked up by Larry Silverstein and Frank Loewy, they just had a part to play and info was doled out to them on a need to know basis. It seems to me that this operation was big enough that it might have required the 'fortification' of the 2000 presidential election to guarantee that the right people would be in the right places. That's way beyond the reach of a couple real estate developers into international organized crime territory.

Who would be able to block remote viewers from seeing an obviously human plot to achieve evil goals here on Earth? Even the best viewers are not good enough to be a threat to a Dr. Evil. It could have just been an effed-up target. Making a good unbiased target seems to be kind of tricky.

Hi Erich and thanks for all of your points. I will digest them and sorry for not giving the time stamp but I will seek it out. There were a few other interesting things I can link to including a piece of rare footage of an orb captured on the attack line of the second strike. Did you read Judy Woods' book or otherwise check out that material? It is very compelling in the way it arrives at a new directed energy weapon as the best explanation of what took place. Andrew Johnson who has worked to support Dr Woods also claims that the group driving the explosives theory was itself part of a psy-op.

I had forgotten about the Faraday Cage and I must revisit that material. It does not make sense though that a Faraday Cage designed to foil electrical surveillance can obscure RV. I have no real knowledge in that area so you may have another opinion.

On the subject of 'dustification' - video of a collapsing tower shows objects like steel girders turning to dust. I have looked at film of controlled demolitions to compare and I must say the same kinds of effects are observable with concrete but not steel girders. I am reluctant to accept the claims on the basis of that video material though.

Anyway apologies for my lack of precision, I do get excited and post in a flurry of intuition and hyperbole sometimes.

Hello Phil and EHB, Realize your posts are 6 months old and I am late to this discussion. Nonetheless I am surprised more posts and replies don’t exist here. Both your posts and questions are thought provoking. I am not familiar with Judy Woods book on this but will find and read it. Phil could you post the video that captured the orb in the attack line of the 2nd strike?
There are so many curious if not incredible aspects of this conspiracy you both point out that deserve further discussion and hope my post will bring others to revisit this. To think that the Pentagon strike was to eliminate auditors who found a couple trillion “missing” is difficult to believe but plausible. Believe Tony Rodrigues in his book Ceres Colony Cavalier mentioned this as a coverup of funds for the secret space program but not sure.
Both the 9/11 and Death Traps RVs fall into an area I call cognitive dissonance. We can read and watch these videos as well as entertain discussion on them. However I believe most on this forum would not believe what is presented despite compelling evidence. Do you two believe what Farsight describes as waiting for us after death? You both are already in a vast minority with what you appear to believe on 9/11.
Two final questions? How could such a conspiracy involving so many players not be exposed by the media and numerous whistleblowers by now? How could these players be so evil and driven by such sinister motives?

I watched Death Traps a long time ago and didn't find it all that interesting. As I recall, there wasn't really much of anything in the RV impressions that would lead one to the conclusions in the introduction or summary. It's kind of like how that reverse speech guy David Oates always tells people in advance what they should hear in the reversals otherwise they never hear it. My own belief is that the memory storage mechanism of the brain is something mysterious and external to the body, so when I find information about NDE or remote viewing of an afterlife I'm looking for things that would confirm or disprove that idea.

With regard to Tony Rodrigues and Ceres, the Farsight viewers clearly saw one scene after another ripped off from various sci fi movies like Aliens, Enders Game, Starship Troopers, and Star Wars. In fact, Intysam begins with a man looking at a star filled movie screen (turned sideways) and proceeds to draw the entire opening scene of Star Wars turned sideways with a moon, arc of a close planet, large triangular ship, and a geometric arrangement of the engines on Pricess Leia's ship. She then goes on to describe space nazis in a spherical multi layered base like a death star where a super soldier in a cloak with shifty eyes is trying to escape. Hmm, I wonder who that could be? Tony might be a nice guy with sincere beliefs, but I think something went wrong in his brain.

How could a vast 9/11 conspiracy not be exposed? It has been exposed, but people don't want to believe the government is that corrupt. Those pointing out the fraud also have no powers or resources to actually do anything, those are all controlled by the perpetrators. The best way to keep secrets is to convince others to commit serious crimes; the entire law enforcement apparatus of a nation then vigilantly enforces the silence. If you also control law enforcement and the media, it's super easy to commit huge crimes and cover them up. One of the big lies perpetrated by the James Bond movies is that organized crime operates outside of governments.

The conspirators behind 911 likely come from a mix of sociopaths and psychopaths. The psychopaths are born, but the sociopaths are created from genuinely caring children whose worldview is turned into one seeking covert revenge against outsiders as a result of being fed a distorted version of history