Dr Brown, PhD
Farsight Director
Montréal, 07-25
Thank you for your remarkable session of ET contact with your best viewers (less Aziz who we miss greatly on these sessions).
I am a French Canadian from Montreal, a CPA by trade, not a scientist, and a commoner as the Queen would refer to me. I have been practising transcendental meditation as per Maharishi Mahesh Yogi teaching, for many years. I have realized that I had over the years a number of ESP events, enough to be convince that we are more than we think, there is more to humans than their physical form. These events were random and I cannot really provoke them or control them, as your people do.
I do not want to linger on the physical proof thing. I understand your explanations on the secrecy kept by the authorities, political and military. I am a subscriber of Farsight prime and have seen all your published sessions since the start I believe, including some interviews on youtube, some of which being frustrating for you for good reasons. Interviewers do not always take the time to understand your work prior to an interview, and show remarkable lack of understanding of the basics, and even close mindedness. However, may I make a suggestion that would greatly facilitate our understanding of your viewers’ sessions, and allow some slow progress in understanding of the ET phenomena? What is missing sometimes is a description of the ETs they meet psychically, and their ships. There is a booklet published on internet (but there is so much misinformation published by the authorities like CIA that I am careful in browsing internet) apparently made by the KGB for their agents, describing some 50 species of ETs that have been reported by witnesses and investigated by the KGB or the Russian army over the years. Apparently, Americans authorities have description and classification of more than 90 species and many types of “ships”, and the former Canadian Defense minister talked on internet in a disclosure conference, about approximately 30 species that he has been made aware of through the reports sent to him by the Canadian and US militaries over the years. It would be very helpful if you summarize and publish descriptions of ETs in all your psychic encounters by your people, as they happen in the future, but also in the many past encounters. Get your group together and search their memories, and publish what is corroborated by several of your people, their consensus in terms of descriptions. Also, what is known by your group in terms of objectives, mission, behaviour of these ETs. For instance: Reptilians have agendas of control, negative control over humans and other ETs throughout the galaxy or part of it. It has been reported that they use one type of Greys, the small ones with big slated eyes that appear to be black covers over their eyes. They are frail and numerous and appear to work as a group like bees, and communicate telepathically. They perform abductions, millions of them throughout the world, apparently as agents of Reptilians and others. Mufon has investigated and found some evidences of more than 500,000 such encounters and abductions throughout the years, in America only. We hear your people saying in their sessions: “I see this being”, “there is one being in that ship, a non human being”. OK if you see it you can describe it, and indeed sometimes they do but far from all the time. And sometimes your people simply sense a presence and can communicate ideas, questions and answers, without seeing the being, and in those cases, we understand that they did not see them but perceive them psychically, that is fine, a meeting without clarity of a Hi-Fi television, that is fine, we can accept that physical description cannot be given. But often they can describe them and they do not. And they do not possess a similar quality of language, there are major differences between Aziz and Princess clarity and this lady whose name I forget, that presented first a useless mumble-jumble of her experience in poor language in that session of encounter yesterday. This session is very long for what is happening that we can follow. And the reaction of people frustrated by the lack of physical evidence in that video was maybe due in part by the advertising you did of this session: “… and the cameras were there rolling… the best encounter we ever had…finally a proof of existence, etc”. Your advertised session was understood to be a physical film of the ETs, one species at least. Not only was there no physical evidence (I accept and understand that), but no description whatsoever was given by your experiencers of these ETs, who were they? Surely not 6 species regrouped… they were there around your people, but who were they?
For instance, if I try to classify and understand the basic description of each species, on internet I find so much misinformation and sometimes conflicting descriptions, that we get lost. For instance, are the Tall Whites encountered by this American soldier meteorologist that became PhD in physics after his passage in the army, the same group as the so called “Nordics”, almost human looking but for the size of their eyes and their height? The Tall Whites appear to inhabit from time to time the underground base made for them by the army in the early fifties in S4, called Dreamland, in the Nevada desert north of Nellis. Did your people meet the Tall Whites? I do not recall they did. This soldier reported that the Greys, who themselves have a cave nearby, are not friend of the Tall Whites. What is the agenda of the Tall Whites, and the agenda of the Greys? Who were the ETs met by Eisenhower? A group acting on behalf of the Reptilians, I remember. A bit of classification of the ETs your people meet or talk to would greatly help. The Essassani, the Greys performing abduction, the Human looking ones met by your people. Who are the super soldiers of Ceres? How do they fit in (or do they?). We never heard of them, and they are not described. Only the Reptilians appear classified because they are so different from other groups. Who are the ETs influencing Putin, the Popes, the politicians? Give some descriptions when you see them or talk to them, if you can perceive them sufficiently. I am not asking to extrapolate, I appreciate your careful scientific approach in this regard, this is the reason I continue to follow your work.
I do not want to criticize, I love and have a lot of respect for your work, I bought and read your book on the analysis of remote viewing, I cannot say I understood most of it, but it was great! When I tried to follow your work when I became aware of it through an interview of yours, I kept a bit of healthy skepticism at first, but it could be useful to mention herein that what convinced me of the existence and usefulness of remote viewing was the video of the Pyramids and especially the work done on Iapetus. The corroboration of the anomalies photographed by NASA, as you describe them, and the description given by Dick Allgire (he made me laugh when he described the aliens there: “I am a f.. alien”) and Dazz Smith. Atlantis was also well corroborated, being “pass the pilars of Neptune”. The return in the past a million years blew my mind in Iapetus and Cedonia. Similarly, the corroboration of the Oumuamua. So not only human perception can see beyond earth, but also in the past. Also, the work published by Dick Alguire on viewing sessions by a Japanese scientist in Hawaii on the large Hadron collider at Cern. This was mind blowing. The best piece of work to me by your own viewers is probably Area 51, and the description of lower levels of this base by Aziz, at the moment he got blocked by the Reptilian met there. Impressive work on 911, I got angry when I realized that what the engineering group analyzing the events of 911 is saying was right, it was all staged by the US government, led by D.R. But we should also mention Princess viewing of the Reptilians and the respect they seem to have of her mental abilities (which is not the same for Intysam, called a pet by one of them with total disrespect, poor sweetheart). She is good too, well trained by yourself on the method.
In retrospect all this is excellent work and I cannot emphasize enough that yourself and your group will pass in history as major agents of awakening of the human race, no less. I have poor success in advertising to my engineers friends your network. I wish we arrive soon as a situation where remote viewing will be taught in classrooms of universities, but it will be so easy to squash those tentative for the scientific and political establishments.
I read and appreciate also the work done by Ingo Swann, Puthoff, Joseph McMoneagle and a few others. In this regard of major contribution, we miss Aziz, I hope he contributes more often. All the best to him, to yourself Dr Brown, and all of your group. Please continue.
Dominique Poulin
Saint-Lambert, Quebec