In the spirit of disclosure, I'd like to throw out a bold and crazy claim here: that every anti-gravitational propulsion system throughout the Universe is based --in principle-- on the macroscopic model of a single electron. A system like this therefore shares precisely the same attributes as this particle: It has no mechanically moving "parts," requires no fuel and never wears out, but gathers its energy from the ambient space into a vortex of self-contained, self-regenerating force: a hurricane in a bottle.

Ultimately, the internal relationship here between the dual properties of electrical and magnetic nature inevitably repeats throughout the spectrum of existence, and thus explains why every particle, atom, moon, planet, star, solar system, galaxy --and beyond-- also ceaselessly rotates. This is the epitome of the ancient principle, as above, so below.

Finally, the principle of particle spin is also necessarily the core principle and source of self-reflective consciousness. I should add at this point that the phenomenon of sensation (consciousness) is actually an inherent quality of electromagnetic force, which is why those who believe that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the electrical flow in the nerves and the phenomenon of consciousness are unable to solve the conundrum and fall into paradoxical thinking; when in reality, electromagnetic resonance IS the essence of sensation already. It's a given! And this is also why, overall, the ufo phenomenon itself is simultaneously equal parts 'psychic' and 'physical' and thus at the level of anti-gravitational vehicles, are scarcely distinguishable from one another.

This is very interesting. Is there more you could elaborate on this topic?

Absolutely! I can provide nearly complete engineering plans. The detailment may be tedious on a format such as this, but we can make a stab at it : ). Where would you like to start?

Serious? engineering plans?

I'd like to see everything. If it's easy to post in this thread, go for it. If you already have a pdf you'd rather upload you could send it to me [email protected] or we could pick some ftp to make it openly available to everyone here. Any way you'd like. Thanks!

I like your thinking, but I have to admit to a personal agenda that I would define as a search for people of like mind. What I'm really looking for are *questions* that allow me to ultimately unfold the sublime simplicity of existence in measured steps. That said, I know I have to supply some degree of fundamental design theory in order to start pushing that cube uphill.

Let's start with this: Michael Faraday was the inventor of the self-exciting disc dynamo. This was comprised essentially of a copper disc --the armature-- with a mechanical hand-crank. When this was turned, the copper of the disc was made to pass through the field of a permanently magnetized horseshoe magnet placed at the edge of the disc. This generated an electrical current that then traveled to the axis, where it was picked up by brushes and routed by wire that was wound around the magnet, thereby increasing its initial magnetic field. This in turn, naturally increased the amplitude of the current and so on.. Unfortunately, the magnetic field that is induced within the copper armature becomes increasingly coupled to the field of the magnet itself and the two components (the armature and the stator) begin to increasingly grip one another ever more tightly, such that it requires increasingly greater (electromotive) force to turn the crank beyond a certain rate.

This is the mechanical analog of the principle of particle spin.

Now, it's entirely possible to construct a dynamo that builds power via precisely the same principle, but without the need for any mechanical force or contrivance to induce precisely the same internal relationship between the electrical and magnetic.

The late naturalist, Ivan T. Sanderson once related in his book, Invisible Residents,
( https://ia601902.us.archive.org/19/items/invisible-residents-ivan-sanderson/INVISIBLE%20RESIDENTS%20Ivan%20Sanderson.pdf )
that numerous reports by the Navy of ufos near the ocean surface that appeared to be hovering at the top of water-spouts. This is of course, a major clue : )

There is another excellent and somewhat famous clue at the back of the same book --page #224.

Beyond this however, what I have to convey in response to the proper questions is substantially more detailed with regard to theory and design. Understanding is crucial and a benefit to us both. The control system is itself a marvel of cybernetics.

There is a YouTube channel called alien scientist.

A whole back he made a video saying that antigravity probably works off of a ferrofluid that is also a superfluid.

By having a fluid spinning around endlessly, faster and faster, the craft eventually creates lift. There were other models having to do with water microwaved inside copper tubing.

At any rate, all I can say is you need to create something that lifts itself without a rotor and without needing some special platform (eg: maglevs do create lift without a rotor). Even if you have a working prototype that does this just slightly, you have a very important technology.

Alas: that is likely how you get assassinated. I think it's been invented many times over and just killed off. I guess you have to not only invent, you need to get it under the protection of the Harvey crew . . . Whomever they are.

So my question: do you think you can get a working prototype? Even a basic one?

Oh, yeah! : ) In another time and space, a very primitive version could be built in the equivalence of a two-car garage (just note the description in the Samarangana Sutradhara) but in the here and now, the logistical requirements are not insignificant, and not the least of which are deeply annoying monetary and legal considerations as a result of *current* conditions.

This is particularly true with regard to the need for a liquid metal armature --such as mercury, indium and gallium-- that the Cabal keeps very close tabs on and has, essentially, made illegal to own in any useful quantity. For example, their first step --roughly fifty years ago-- was to associate toxicity with the element, mercury itself by confusing it in the public mind with mercuric oxide. in particular, they made a big media noise about mercury-tainted food, neurological damage and the dangers of eating tuna.. etc., until they forced legislation to closely supervise any acquisition of the element itself. Any attempt to amass sufficient quantities is to therefore tempt fate in the form of swat teams and men in hazmat suits.

Now to me, who was born with a wide streak of insurgency in his soul : ) this, alone is not actually a deal breaker --although let's face it, one is ultimately butting heads here with the U.S military's secret space programs, as well as the CIA, etc. But after many years of dormancy for me, I can see all this coming to an end, so I've begun taking these initial steps in the meantime to prep for a very different future, and for reasons involving a variety of human skills, necessarily involves a more collective endeavor.

So back to matters at hand: You mentioned the effects of rotational mass. I'm quite familiar with the various reports to that effect and am aware that they're completely valid. Weight is indeed reduced, but the effect does not result in lift. This has been a puzzle to many, but one needs to see past the presence of the inert masses involved and look to what's happening with regard to the electron cloud inside them. There are two different dynamics going on here. The most visible is the effect of centrifugal force that's generated via the spinning of an inert mass; the second is the highly constrained vortex that's being generated at a very subtle level. This level, involving purely the electrons themselves, is serving the same function as those within Faraday's copper armature. There may be no horseshoe magnet in immediate evidence, but this "armature" is however, passing through the Earth's magnetic field, which thus ultimately serves to organize a coherent electromagnetic vortex, and, as subtle as this is, it is this that's creating the measurable reduction in weight of the more inert components... The specific physics of this this will, in turn become more apparent as we proceed.

Knock on wood : )

Just to see if I get part of what you're saying-

Gravity is really just an expression of electromagnetism. Earth's gravity is essentially Earth's electromagnetic field.

When you produce an object which achieves an electromagnetic power greater than the Earth electromagnetic power, you have potential "lift" or "antigravity". You still need to compensate for the actual weight of the object.

I guess my next question is; if creating such a device is possible given access to materials that are not next to impossible in our politick? then it may be worth trying and if achieved- spread the information fast and wide, in simplest terms, before they can kill it off. But on the other hand, if the materials are next to impossible to get a hold of, then in theory indeed the cabal has won this match for now and we may as well stay on the RV / UAP photography train. (Even those things, they've achieved much to snuff the potential out)

In regard to the first issue, the phenomenon we refer to as "gravity" cannot be directly correlated with the electromagnetic, nor does it actually exist as a distinct force. There are no 'gravity particles,' for instance. This sounds paradoxical on the face of it until one begins to grasp that gravity is actually the by-product of only a particular *form* of electromagnetic expression --that being an electromagnetic accumulation that's become contained in, and as, a vortex. This is key.

I think this is because every individual electron is, itself also a vortex; so at the macroscopic level --say of a propulsive system-- when an EM vortex forms, it reflects, echoes and resonates with the underlying physics of electrified space and time. In brief --and I mean very, very brief : ) -- a coupling, or linkage is then formed that allows propulsion systems based on such a principle direct access to the scalar foundation of particle existence.

In other words, the generation of electro-gravitic force is not merely a question of generating "an electromagnetic power greater than the Earth(s)" in order to ensure flight.

There is another aspect to consider.

A bit more than a hundred years ago, when T. Townsend Brown was still a teenager, his (wealthy) family bought him an X-ray machine. This device was not professionally installed, and one of the electrical cables --that was equipped with a large "coke can" sized capacitor-- was left dangling, loosely suspended in the air near the machine. Brown noticed then that every time he turned it on, this capacitor would lurch toward its positive pole, then hesitate momentarily before relaxing back into its original position. Later, he deduced that this directional effect lasted only as long as the capacitor continued to charge.

Now, it's not widely recognized, but electrical currents always form double helixes of electrons as they flow, be it through wires or free space. ( In space, these are now referred to as Birkeland currents. (see: Electric Universe Model/Thunderbolts Project) So as Browns' capacitor was being charged, the electrons entering it were already in a spiraling pattern, thus forming a vortex...

Now consider how this might apply to a self-exciting, vortex-forming generator: Unlike Browns' conventional solid-state capacitor, this vortex literally represents what amounts to a *continuously* charging, continuously discharging capacitor --thus the directional force that's produced becomes equally continuous.

As to spreading such information "fast and wide" I wouldn't worry about that; the end of the old world order is approaching very, very quickly now. Much less than two years from now, we'll be able to buy as much mercury, gallium or indium as needed.

This remindes me of the physcist Dan Winter