****** Intro
In this critique of the Farsight "Jesus and the Crucifixion" project, I will contrast it with the true account of Jesus' death, which I base on the combination of two obscure sources: the Padgettite medium lineage and Yajweh of Ibania's audio tapes. These links are a good starting place to familiarize oneself with those sources:
- https://search.freefind.com/find.html?id=2911983&id2=2911983&pid=r&mode=ALL&n=0&query=sejanus
- https://medium.com/@leo.little.book/the-illuminati-inspiration-for-q-17-great-awakening-753087241653
I rely on the Sasquatch Message for galactic historical context and my understanding of Cosmic Law.
- https://scenicsasquatch.com/2022/04/14/the-essential-role-of-prime-directive-in-understanding-the-alien-phenomenon/
- https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/52352055-the-sasquatch-message-to-humanity-conversations-with-elder-kamooh
I discuss these ideas more generally in this Farsight Prime forum thread:
In this essay, I will focus on critiquing Farsight's most recent project on Jesus' death.
The page is titled:
> Jesus and the Crucifixion
> The true story, told through remote viewing, of what really happened approximately 2,000 years ago.
This title is misleading at best. The true story is indeed present, but it is accompanied by multiple false ones, and Courtney misses it completely, wrongfully destroying the faith of his remote viewers (and his own).
****** 0 Courtney Brown
******* Focus 1
The focus is the actual historical figure of Yeshua ben Yosef, the person currently and popularly known as Jesus, at the target time specified below.
The viewer is to focus only on the actual person and his actual historical reality, regardless of any culturally-accepted historical views or interpretation of this reality, and regardless of any written historical account of this reality.
Regardless of any and all popularly accepted views and interpretations, the viewer is to locate the actual person of Yeshua ben Yosef during the specific time that is now popularly referenced as the crucifixion of Jesus. The viewer is to describe the surroundings of Yeshua ben Yosef during this event.
The viewer is to enter the mind of Yeshua ben Yosef to perceive the emotions, thoughts and mindset of this person at the time of this event.
******** Critique
By itself, this prompt should presumably only yield viewings of Jesus on the cross. However, its pairing with the other prompt makes clear the intent is to find the two Yeshuas. That is why this prompt yields viewings of Yeshua of Krotea, among others.
It also yields views of the patsy-killer Jesus, who exists as a probability reality reinforced by the Gnostics, Muslims and Grays.
******* Focus 2
The focus is the actual person who authorities identified as Jesus and killed, regardless of the actual historical identity of this person, whatever that may be, the target time is specified below.
The viewer is to focus only on the actual person and his actual historical reality, regardless of any culturally-accepted view or interpretation of this reality, and regardless of any written account of this reality.
Regardless of any and all popularly-accepted views or interpretations, the viewer is to locate this person at the time of his death, which is the time that is now popularly referenced as the crucifixion of Jesus, regardless of whether or not the death was by means of crucifixion or any other method.
The viewer is to describe the event and the surroundings of this event. The viewer is to enter the mind of this person, to perceive the thoughts, emotions and mindset of this person at the time of the this event.
******** Critique
The second focus makes clear that the first should display the Yeshua who wasn't crucified. So the second focus displays the versions of Jesus that were crucified:
1. Yeshua ben Yosef beaten and crucified
2. Mad patsy
******* Critique
Focus 2 unambiguously targets Jesus bar Joseph, since that is who the authorities killed in historical reality.
Focus 1 targets Yeshua, which is also the name of Yeshua of Krotea, who is NOT called "Jesus" by anyone, but is famous in the galaxy.
Thus for the Higher Self to fully resolve the mystery of the two Yeshuas, Focus #2 must show Jesus bar Joseph, and Focus #1 must show Yeshua of Krotea.
Who else can the Higher Self show? Only fictitious people from probability realities, or else Pontius Pilate as #1, since he is the culprit for Jesus bar Joseph's death. (Prompt #1 was also written to find the culprit, since Courtney had the Sethite belief that Jesus baited a patsy into being crucified for him.)
Sometimes Higher Selves display fictitious people to affirm the Viewers' beliefs, so as not to infringe on their Free Will, in accordance with Cosmic Law.
****** 1 Intysam
******* Bio
Intysam Goldsmith:
- AmBriKen (American, British, Swahili Kenyan)
- can nearly pass for White or Asian. (Thus calling subjects "darker" is relative to her.)
- Muslim husband.
******* Focus 1
setting:
- red and orange hues
- low mountains
- primitive structures, town. Arabian spherical buildings (lone view).
- People wear hard cone shaped hats, like rice farmer, pre-modern (lone view)
Subject A (SA):
- Tall grass.
- Crowd of people, noisy. Mild energetics in background.
- SA wearing somewhat fancy clothes: puffed out round robes with space inside - cool
- Has triangular headgear, doesn't cover whole head (lone view).
SA is observing the aforementioned crowd. He stands off to the side.
SA's mentality:
- calm, observant, unobtrusive
- calculating
- unobtrusive, he blends into the background
- he is very displeased about something
- quite aloof
- guarded and cautious
- aware of Viewer
- relatively emotionless
SA contemplates the crowd's behavior, and the structure of society. His goals are reform, changing the system. His thoughts on this display elevated diction. His plan is presently going well, but will unravel in the future.
******** Critique
There's nothing Christlike about SA. He must be the fictional patsy-killer Jesus. He feels soulless, and is probably not a real person.
******* Focus 2
Inside a great hall, a discussion occurs. Viewer draws it as pagoda-esque (lone view).
Subject B (SB):
- tan skin, wrinkles, facial hair
- deduction: Chairman Mao (lone view)
- robes
- row of people behind him
- enthusiastic
target event:
- urban environment
- possible energetics
- SB with entourage and hat
- encounters Group X
Next scene:
SB is now in a different environment, alone with Group X, without his entourage. SB is quite freaked out, dismayed and bewildered. SB is abducted and imprisoned. His back is injured.
Next scene:
SB is crucified. Slack-jawed crowd watches (soulless). Viewer deducts Jesus on the cross.
SB's mindset progression:
1. chipper celebrity
2. suspicious, cautious, distrust of Group X
3. worried, anxious, fearful prisoner
4. dead
******** Critique
Viewer saw a fictitious soulless patsy. The Chinese setting is odd and anachronistic, as are the conical hats.
******* Reveal
Group X assaulted Subject B and crucified him.
Intysam has pre-existing belief from reading that Jesus traveled to India after he supposedly died. Explains the Asian influence on her imagination.
Courtney mentions the Koran agrees with swap theory, perhaps explaining the Arabian influence. Intysam's husband is Muslim, perhaps influencing her beliefs.
Intysam is unphased by Courtney's assertion that the crucifixion of Jesus didn't happen.
******* Conclusion
Faint ambient energetics may indicate a belief-generated probability reality. All characters are soulless cutouts.
Odd architecture and clothing seems anachronistic, lacking verisimilitude. Perhaps suggesting the influence of Muslim preconceptions. Architecture and environment looks Arabian.
The hats seem to be taken from pileus cornutus, but its widespread use then is doubtful:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pileus_%28hat%29
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_hat
The patsy-killer Jesus didn't even bother to watch the crucifixion; he was watching a different crowd to evaluate the progress of his socio-religious revolution.
Intysam displayed no empathetic pain feedback from the crucifixion, again suggesting a soulless fictional target.
****** 2 Aziz Brown
******* Focus 1
Setting:
- multiple buildings
- women inside, men outside
- primitive setting
- hats aren't conical; look more realistic.
Subject A (SA):
- aura of calmness
- radiating psychic power. Light blueish aura, energetic.
- feels like a religious person
- hair to bottom of neck (consistent with galactic norms, since hair length improves psychic sensitivity)
- irregular topography, some buildings around
- head nod and smile acknowledges the RVer - real soul present!
(This sounds like Yeshua of Krotea, who is described this way by Yajweh. Yeshua of Krotea is a renowned Ascended Master, teacher in galaxy, utterly peaceful and non-judgmental, easy-going to a fault, always giving.)
Mind probe of SA:
- intently RVing the crucifixion
- sees cross being hoisted upright
Mental state of SA:
- melancholy
- plan/job going poorly, harder than expected
- wanted to bring Light to the world, illuminate globe, but only a few were Illuminated
- quite sad at failure
(Emotions are realistic. Impressive. Aziz seems quite perceptive; not surprising considering he is a starseed psychic from birth!)
******* Focus 2
Subject B (SB):
- clothes a bit finer than surrounding people's
- Greek/Roman architecture. marbled.
Mindset:
- SB is quite negative, agitated.
- to be fair, an average person would look bad compared to Subject A.
- SB still has a negative personality
- pacing and grumbling is his baseline state.
- SB is a celebrity with an entourage.
Next scene:
- leading procession with crowds watching
- celebrity with an entourage, leading this lifestyle
- suddenly ambushed by group of armored soldiers, halting unarmed parade
- battle ensues, many killed
- a few soldiers are injured, but many civilians are killed
- SB lies injured, prone
What happened:
1. SB was at the front, leading the parade.
2. SB saw the soldiers in front of him and immediately fled the other way, pushing past his disciples, fleeing like a cornered rat.
3. A rogue (plainclothes cop) intercepts his flight and backstabs him, holding him until he's taken prisoner.
Crucifixion:
- small audience watching
- crowd just staring at him, no particular emotions mentioned
Subject A was watching this from a similar environment.
******** Critique
No strong empathetic impressions whatsoever from this focus, suggesting a fictional character.
(Except for the grumbling negativity of B, but it seems common for these fictional realities to have some superficial negative emotion to them. Just nothing soulfully deep.)
Subject B doesn't seem Jesus-like at all.
Aziz saw a fictional probability reality because he agrees with his father Courtney that Jesus wasn't crucified. Talent can't alter the blinders of belief.
******* Conclusion
It's intriguing that Aziz remote-viewed Yeshua of Krotea with great talent, yet failed to see Jesus bar Joseph, due to Aziz's belief that the latter wasn't crucified. Aziz's talent with emotional depth allows us to distinguish the soulful verisimilitude of the first focus with the false flatness of the second. Aziz was still able to pick out an impressively detailed logical plot to the events, sufficient to demonstrate the cowardly and despicable nature of the fictional patsy.
Aziz mentions the ease with which Yeshua of Krotea remote views the distant crucifixion. Obviously someone with this level of psychic ability would have little trouble evading Roman authorities who don't know his face. No reason to trick a patsy into crucifixion before leaving town. He can just remote view for any pursuers or checkpoints, and go a different way.
Ironically, Aziz's talent disproves Courtney's thesis, which they both believe!
****** 3 Shantae
******* Focus 1
Location:
- hills in background
- city or town, populated
- coastal, primitive (consistent with Caesarea Maritima, why does Courtney never mention this? Not Jerusalem!)
Scene:
- people in robes around a structure (building? pool?)
- cool temperatures
Subject A:
- dark, short hair
- wrinkles
Positive emotions:
- calm, optimistic
- leader
- wise
- inflexible
SA focusing on surrounding people:
- grand goal requires popular participation: wants to make environment thrive
- disappointed with progress
- somewhat unrealistic goal or execution
- overly ambitious
- seeing modern result, SA is embarrassed about failure but pleased at progress
******** Critique
This is inconclusive. Feels like a fictional character. Contradictory traits are given, confusingly.
******* Focus 2
Setting:
- hilly, buildings
- moderate temperatures
- white and beige hues (consistent with Casesarea philippi.)
Subject B:
- long hair, tan complexion, robes
- dark hair
- younger
SB is in a building, in pain, bewildered. He's injured nonfatally. Group X is targeting B.
New location, outside:
- B is trapped, mostly ignored
- dark energy
(New scene?):
B is crucified, and group X left.
SA aware of B's state, regrets, but wouldn't change SA's actions.
******** Critique
Someone gets crucified here, but beyond that, nothing is clear.
******* Reveal
This was just a poor-quality RVing. Not enough detail to say much. Maybe the documents would shed more light.
Can't even tell whether Subject A was aware of Subject B's crucifixion via psionics or mundane means, such as word of mouth.
******* Conclusion
Beyond falsifying the New Testament, this RVing is simply inconclusive.
Can't tell which version we're seeing here: swap or Padgettite.
The flatness of the characters suggests they are fictional, anyway.
****** 4 Kahmia Dunson
******* Focus 1
Setting:
- hilly background
- primitive coastal town (Caesaria philippi)
- crowd
- lot of grays and blues - ocean colors
Subject A
- Outdoor setting
- light-skinned
- light aura (Pilate is psychic?)
- stoic, emotionless, lacking depth (fictional person?)
Subject A is looking at Subject B.
Scenes of Subject B:
1. enthusiastic, confident, popular leader
2. imprisoned in a box, like jail, wagon
Subject B:
- fair skinned, short hair
- prisoner
- radiating light aura
- audience sitting around him on benches. They're all wearing similar long, light robes. (Sanhedrin)
Subject A:
- fair-skinned, dark eyes, very very short hair (military cut?)
- average build and height, maybe a bit tall
- not heartless, has things he cares about, but not a good person to me
- prominent nose (matches Pilate)
- fully clothed, wearing a hood, dark colored robe, looks scary (Sith Illuminati)
- powerful authority, stoic
- powerful, judge, authority over the Sanhedrin
(The hood may be to help Pilate focus his psychic abilities selectively during the trial.)
SA's mindset:
- emotions are strong, fluctuating, anxious and angry.
- has difficulty differentiating between his job and his personal identity.
- is some kind of religious figure
- feels responsibility for his subjects
(Perhaps Roman governors had some religious duties. Pilate wielded partial authority over the Sanhedrin. As an elite Roman Illuminati, Pilate was certainly involved in occult rituals. This part may be genuine.)
SA is looking at SB in the cage. SA feels sad for what's to come, pity, but it has to happen. His greater goal is harmony for the populace. SA feels the weight of the world on his shoulders. SA is unsure of the outcome of this event. SA's goal is to lead the populace on the right path.
(Biblical pro-Pilate version.)
******** Critique
Subject A is obviously Pontius Pilate.
Subject A is not remote-viewing Jesus; he's actually there presiding over the Sanhedrin as it sentences him to death! This is a total targeting failure, as it cannot be Yeshua ben Yosef presiding over his own patsy's execution.
This is the Biblical account of Pilate's motives, but set in Caesarea Maritima. Fictional person, but based on a real one. Lacks deep soulful emotional vividness, just abstract.
I guess the malformed prompt really messed things up, if the RVer is seeing someone who's not even remotely Jesus!
On the other hand, Pilate is the person actually responsible for Jesus' death. So it partially satisfies Courtney's intent when writing the prompt, to identify the person who caused the crucifixion.
******* Focus 2
Subject B's emotions:
- strong emotions: grief, wounded, yet also acceptance and understanding.
- has mentally prepared for the current circumstances. He's at peace.
- deeply passionate
- identifies with something larger, sees the big picture
- has done lots of preaching and lecturing
Subject B's appearance:
- has a decent-sized nose.
- He is skinny, malnourished. (Starved while transported to Caesaria Philippi)
- His hands are bound.
- He is shaved bald (presumably after being taken prisoner, to reduce lice).
SB is speaking to a hostile audience (preaching to Sanhedrin).
They reject his words and want him executed.
They reject him as fraud and a deceiver.
(The above feels vivid and genuine, like the historical Jesus. Kahmia emphasizes Jesus' passion.)
Prior scene:
- SB is freely walking around and preaching.
- There's a raucous argument.
(This scene may be fictional, the Biblical account of Jesus' arrest.)
Subject A pities SB, wants to help him, but doing so is outside of his power. At the end of the day, SA must keep the Sanhedrin happy. SA doesn't want to become deeply involved with SB, doesn't want to be too closely associated with him. SA's attitude is, "It is what it is."
(This is the fictional Biblical account of a sympathetic Pilate.)
Later scene:
- SB is dead, of exhaustion and malnutrition, crucified.
- Some of the crowd are sad. Others are relieved SB is gone.
(This scene lacks vividness and may be fictional.)
Recap of events:
1. Subject B shows up bound, being very preachy, passionate.
2. Subject A witnessed the preaching and was like, "Uhh, I'm not sure whether I like this."
3. Sanhedrin hated and rejected it.
4. Then SB is in caged wagon on display.
5. Then SB is crucified and dies of starvation and thirst.
Pilate also witnessed the crucifixion, and felt more sad about it than any of the other witnesses.
(Fictional Biblical account; lacks vividness.)
******** Critique
This could be the real Jesus' trial at the Sanhedrin in Caesaria Philippi. The impression of Jesus is vivid enough.
However, it is a false portrayal of Pilate: the pro-Roman one from the New Testament.
Kahmia is clearly skilled, as the true parts of her remote-viewing have soulful verisimilitude, while the fictional parts are flat and uninspired.
******* Reveal
Kahmia's reaction: "That's wild, I never even heard of, I never even thought that could be a thing. I'm just in shock (laugh)."
So she had a standard Christian view, as expected, which influenced her view of Pilate.
Courtney gives his Seth version as authoritative, despite it not matching the data at all. The man crucified in Kahmia's RV was not "a little bit mentally weak." He was noble, righteous and humane.
The way Courtney stumbles over the actual documents while trying to support his points suggests that he just forces his conclusion onto the data without even knowing whether it supports his interpretation. He assumes that two Jesuses means Seth is correct. That is not how science works: Falsifying one hypothesis does not prove the other.
SA is aware of SB's fate, calling it "a necessary evil". He could stop it, but doesn't want to get deeply involved. SA is neither happy nor angry about it. This matches the New Testament's (fictional) Pilate.
Kahmia says Pilate had a sense of authority, but it wasn't a police authority. "Like he couldn't go around arresting people, but he had that status." This is consistent with the fact that the Jews arrested Jesus, but had to go to Pilate to obtain the death penalty. Pilate presided over the Sanhedrin, but the Jews had significant local autonomy.
****** 5 Yeme Jeanee
******* Focus 1
Setting:
Primitive coastal desert town, with hills in background (consistent with Caesarea maritima)
"terroristic, multidirectional movement" is Jesus being whipped in the hippodrome for public entertainment.
The Hippodrome of Caesarea: Where Roman hubris met Jewish valor | Times of Israel
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-hippodrome-of-caesarea/
Subject A:
- large-built man, stocky maybe, some wrinkles, large nose, wide squinty eyes
- cream-colored clothes
- triangular peaked structure flashing around (the cross)
SA is grumpy. His face is always scrunched. He's stern, preoccupied, aloof, overworked. He's not exactly mean, but he's not my favorite person. He's aware of the remote viewer, and peers at her. She doesn't like his glare.
(This feels like the real Pilate! Nobody who crucifies that many people is nice.)
SA is focusing on a small triangular object with something to the side (the cross).
(Perhaps Pilate is remote-viewing the crucifixion here.)
SA's emotions:
- not very positive
- many pictures in his mind
- He's focused on completing a task, but it's not going well.
- He feels slighted, shorthanded, micromanaged, underneath.
- He's smothered by someone above.
(Sounds like Sejanus pressuring Pilate to squeeze more money out of the Temple scam, despite growing Jewish rebelliousness.)
Pilate is not meeting his goal. He feels underequipped. He feels oppressed by his superiors. He is extremely frustrated and feels disrespected.
(Sejanus was desperate to secure enough bribes to usurp Tiberius, and appointed Pilate.)
******** Critique
This is an impressively accurate description of Pilate, matching the Padgettite accounts. Jeanee's Higher Self is telling her that contrary to Seth's claims, the real culprit for Jesus' death was Pilate, who pressured by Sejanus to squeeze Judea bribe money so that the Senate and legions would support Sejanus' usurpation of Tiberius.
Overall, the physical depictions of Pilate by the remote-viewers are impressively accurate: large nose, wide-set eyes, and military-cut hair.
One suspects Pilate's hair in real life was shorter at this time than is typically portrayed in idealized statues and paintings. While squeezing a rebellious province, emphasizing his military mien would be best for troop morale and intimidation. Stylish hair is for impressing aristocrats back home in Rome.
******* Focus 2
Setting:
- painted structures or peaks,
- hues of cream or white, almost like the moon
- cement and stone
(consistent with Caesarea Maritima)
Scene:
calm environment, with movement, people.
Subject B:
- wide loose clothing, dark colored
- little to no hair (already a prisoner?)
- tan, lighter skinned than Yeme
- round face
- tall, not slim or fat
Mindset:
- closed-off mind. (given that Pilate was psychic, guarded thoughts protect his friends)
- mistrustful, afraid.
- watching surroundings keenly
- mild mannered, extremely introverted (not a fame-hound)
- mind in overdrive
- driven to accomplish important goal
- feeling dismay: "I didn't sign up for this" (anyone would be)
Scene:
- environment has lots of action
- Subject B is paranoid, spiraling
- action happening that greatly distresses SB
- SB is striving to hold on, gasping for breath
- enduring great pain for others' sake
- pain from shoulders, back, legs
- his hearing is damaged
- he's very fit. has endured chaos like this before (whipping)
- soldiers beating and dominating him publicly, kicking him
Previous scene:
- he was fleeing with someone, maybe
- or just trying to protect himself during the beating
Later scene:
- SB is whipped
- then crucified
- feels like his sides are impaled
(This may be cramps in his sides like from running, or possibly when he was speared in the side after death.)
Crucifixion scene:
SB looks half-blind out into the crowd for his mother or girlfriend. His concern is for her.
(What hurt Jesus the most was that Mary watched him die. Wow.)
******** Critique
This is a deeply empathetic crucifixion scene. It unquestionably feels soulful and real.
This is no madman or patsy. This is the real Jesus. His fortitude and love even under torture are amazing.
******* Reveal
******** Yeme's faith
Yeme intuited that it was Jesus, so it wasn't exactly blind. Her faith let her see.
Yeme is shocked, incredulous and puzzled that her remote-viewing showed Jesus wasn't crucified (according to Courtney's interpretation). So she does believe in Jesus, which explains why she was able to see his true crucifixion. This also explains why her Higher Self showed her Pilate, his real killer. Bravo for her faith seeing through the false prompt! Too bad Courtney carelessly proceeded to trample it.
However, perhaps her faith *didn't* let her see Yeshua of Krotea, since she believes the Biblical account. But she has no strong opinion about Pilate, and thus was able to see his true motives and nature. I guess her faith is intuitive rather than dogmatic.
******** Seth's lies
"Judas' job was to lead the authorities to the wrong guy, so that Jesus could get out of town," Courtney says (repeating Seth). This is risible Gray deceit. Where is Courtney's skepticism?
Courtney claims the authorities didn't even know Jesus' face! How popular would Jesus have to be that not one witness would even describe his face to the Sanhedrin? Jesus debated in the synagogues openly; of course the Sanhedrin knew his face! And if they didn't, why would Jesus need to trick someone into being crucified just to escape Jerusalem? Why go there at all?
Gray propaganda can only confuse naive remote viewers who don't understand basic human nature (which Grays also don't understand). Apply a little due diligence and common sense, and their story quickly falls apart. At which point they just try to baffle you with more bullshit until you're too confused to keep questioning them.
It's patronizing, but it (usually) works. They're exploiting our short attention spans. Once you're good and confused, they go back to preaching how it all doesn't matter anyway, just meditate and be One.
In historical reality, Pilate didn't dare execute Jesus in Jerusalem, which is why the trial took place in Caesarea maritima. Jerusalem people loved Jesus and would've rioted. Jesus could enter and leave the city at will, with the authorities none the wiser. His friends gladly hosted him, hid him, and warned him of the Temple's manhunt.
******** Yeme's doubts
"The whole Christianity thing is built on something that didn't happen," Courtney said.
Yeme frowned and immediately replied, "I have questions." (Correct! She just saw it happen!)
Yeme pointed out there was a woman in the crowd watching the crucifixion.
Courtney defends that he made two focuses because "it would've been perfectly acceptable for the crucifixion thing to be appearing in both focuses. But it didn't."
He's wrong. It wouldn't have been acceptable for the Higher Selves to show Jesus crucified twice, because that would fail to show that the New Testament narrative is false. It is a lie by evil Roman Illuminati hijacking Jesus' message for own their imperial ends, poisoned with bloody filicidal Reptilian blasphemy against God.
Yeme wisely asks Courtney whether his Sethite agenda influenced what the remote viewers perceived.
Courtney replies that he stays as mentally neutral as possible while writing the targets. This is admirable, but doesn't change the fact that he believes Jesus wasn't crucified.
"So many [remote viewers] come in with the same thing," Courtney says.
They are hardly the same! Courtney has confirmed that there were two Jesuses, which is a great achievement indeed. But he has not proved which narrative is correct, beyond falsifying the New Testament one.
After hearing Courtney's defense, Yeme still has many questions. She laughs and says, "Out of all the people at Farsight, I think I was raised the most religious." That explains why her empathy with Jesus' suffering was the most intense.
Courtney's faith already died; he stopped singing in his Catholic choir as a result.
Yeme said that what hurt Jesus the most was that Mary watched him die. Wow.
Yeme realized that the triangular object she drew was the cross.
Yeme said if this session (the one denying the crucifixion) had come before the others denying various other aspects of the Bible, she probably would have quit. "I would've been like, Goodbye. I would've cried." Strong faith, good instincts!
Yeme's last words: "You have officially fucked me up." Careless conclusions will do that.
****** Conclusion
******* Padgettites win
Like the other Farsight projects on Jesus' death, this project falsifies the New Testament account of the crucifixion. Beyond that, it does *not* support the Sethite account Courtney has been supporting all along.
Instead, it supports the one that also best fits the evidence overall: The Padgettite medium's account. Yajweh's account is the second closest (he fibbed and withheld some things). The two accounts are complementary, because one discusses religion without aliens, and the other discusses aliens without religion. (Cosmic Law on Disclosure can be quite restrictive.)
I believe the Grays chose the patsy-swap narrative because it is compatible with the Gnostic and Muslim belief that Jesus was not crucified. 1.8 billion Muslims strongly believe that the Romans were deceived into crucifying someone else instead of Jesus, which gives powerful psychic faith energy to create a fictional reality. The remote viewers thus saw impressively detailed versions of this probability reality when they were predisposed to believe in it.
******* SRV vs Cosmic Law
Remote viewing can be deceived. Even without malicious interference, SRV protocols aren't sufficient to overcome the Cosmic Law of Free Will and Ignorance: that one's beliefs shape one's perceived reality.
In dreamspace, this law is absolute, as one's subconscious creates one's environment. This Law is training for souls who will eventually go on to create their own worlds. We must "eat our own dogfood" so that we serve our future inhabitants well.
The Cosmos is a multiverse precisely to support this spiritual Law, so asking for the "actual historical reality" as if there were a single timeline is a flawed assumption. Mandela Effects indicate that the rate of timeline change is accelerating as we approach the Unveiling. It is more important to determine which realities are real -- meaning, inhabited by real souls, not by soulless fictions.
Farsight's investigation into the Shroud of Turin convinces me that our timeline is still connected to the real past in which Jesus was crucified and resurrected -- which is very encouraging. I suspect the Grays fear being deprecated into a galactic timeline where only they are real. It is a sad and frightening thought, to be left behind like that, especially for the Grays, whose entire spiritual mission is to become One with All.
Even with the tremendous power of remote viewing, historical investigators must still exercise skepticism and caution, most of all against their own biases. Scientific Remote Viewing is one tool in our arsenal; we must use them all to find the Truth.
******* Gray agenda
The Grays have a multi-timeline view of reality. They don't care much about staying accurate to the historical events of our particular timeline. They provide fake versions of events because Cosmic Law forbids them to Disclose the truth, but they still want to beguile Humans by seeming wise. That's why they always quickly change the subject to their main goal: preaching their spiritual perspective to get more Humans attuned to their frequency so they can have more influence over Humanity and our many valuable resources, which are "coming onto the market" as Humanity enters communion with the galaxy at the turning of the New Age.
This is not unique to the Grays; many unscrupulous species are doing the same. The Grays are just the most aggressive and obvious about it. That's why they're the most famous kind of alien in popular culture. Other species view their behavior as distasteful and shameless, but the Grays are desperate not to be deprecated in the iteration of the galaxy forward in time; they need humanity to correct their spiritual bottleneck. Earth Humans are unique to the galaxy and thus the focal point of a (mostly cold) war over our fully-unlocked potentiality, but the Grays are the most desperate of all the powerful factions.
That's why it seems the Grays just want our attention, to fascinate us, whether through horror, confusion, or infatuation. They wish to hybridize, to fuse.
However much we might find such a suitor creepy, our own straits are desperate enough, with our overburdened planet utterly unprepared for electrical grid failure, that we need them too. But that doesn't mean we should accept their lies!
Obviously the Grays are a genus with great variation and many hybrids. To the extent a species is unified with the Gray Collective, the above generalization tends to be true.
Contrary examples exist. The P'nti, a Gray-Human hybrid race, are ancient friends of humanity. They can still be misleading when pressed, though, and have the limitations of their Gray nature. When in doubt, remember that a Sasquatch elder is always Humanity's wise elder brother -- nearest to us genetically and historically, and untainted by Fallen sin.