Where can I find the research design used. Proof of results.

Here is some of the design material, templates and manuals:
https://farsight.org/SRV/index.html
and
https://farsight.org/HigherEducation/HigherEducationSyllabus1.html

For the "Proof of Results", you need to see the videos, I guess.
I can give you one of the best examples I know so far: The terrorist attack at the Breitscheidplatz Berlin Germany Dec. 19th 2016
You can see the upload date had been Nov 28 2016 and I can swar any oath that I have seen it then before the event happened, it was fucking there. online.

The results analysis of this month from Jan 2017

Compare the Viewing Data (incl. drawings!) with news articles and photos from that time, The Black Object: Black Truck, the Christmas Market incl. decorations and smells, the nearby shop windows ...

For the Time Cross prediction series there are detailed analysis data including tables here:
https://farsight.org/demo/Time_Cross_Project/Time_Cross_Farsight_Predictive_News_page.html
Crypto series:
https://farsight.org/FarsightPress/Cryptocurrency_Past_Forecasts_and_Analyses.html

But for a real "Proof", I think you need to follow this stuff for a longer time. You have to see it on your own, to 100% exclude it maybe somehow constructed afterwards. I have a good example for this: The Bright Spots on Ceres. Before the space probe "Dawn" arrived, there were some white spots visible but it was unclear what these really were. The probe was too far away to see any details. Some wild rumors said it was an ET civilisation, water, etc. Some viewers from Austria did a viewing on it and described something like a volcano spitting ice. There was nothing like an "Ice Vulcano" in the literature before that time. Later the probe came close and it was exactly that! Sensation in Astronomy / Space Research! New phenomenon. But you need to have seen the Viewing Data before the probe arrived and took the good shots. Otherwise you can always somehow assume that it was constructed or manipulated after the event. For this 100% you need to spend some time to watch and follow. And others might say if you tell them what happened: "oh that might have been manipulated" be prepared for this. Internet archive e.g. or a pre-publication to state what you are planning to achieve, deposition with a notary, etc.

Rick Lindal.

How are you doing with Psychology being held up as pseudo science, with a problem with replicability of experiments?

Maybe lying to people as a standard part of your discipline was not such a smart move after all?

And note, I am not stating an opinion here, I am asking you (rather loaded) questions.

https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/its-getting-increasingly-difficult-psychologys-replication-crisis-sceptics-explain

If you want Courtney Browns book on RV, you can pay for it, first chapter is free though;-

http://courtneybrown.com/publications/RemoteViewingTOC_Preface_Chapter1_Index_CourtneyBrown.pdf

If you want my guide on RV analysis and keeping people honest, you can find it here for FREE;-

https://www.remoteviewed.com/files/BasicRVAnalysis.pdf

You might some more heavy hitting stuff at Dr Ed May's site, he has been doing research on RV since the 80s at least.

https://lfr.org