Dear Farsight,
I’ve been following FS for many years and really admire your work.
But I feel compelled to say that it bothers me when someone states “we’re giving you real data” followed by 10 or so minutes of “conclusions” like in today’s UFO Crashes: Cause and Personnel (Part 1 with Aziz Brown).
Aziz, btw, brilliantly stated his thoughts after target reveal (beginning around 1:48:00) that he was “increasingly hesitant to believe that we live in this ‘black & white’ ecosystem of good x bad E.T.s.”.
You nailed it, Aziz.

This video had something close to a 20min introduction by Yemme (and I love her work), that was not necessary, followed by a “narrative”.

Please, please, please, stick to the Data. Don’t try and push a narrative. That’s exactly what the “bad guys” have been doing in our very human politics lately!
“Commit to the data, not to the conclusion”, to paraphrase Jacques Valle.

You only followed a few deaths into the DTs, and they were all in bad circumstances. How about the good people? Many traditions speak about this. If you take a sampling of the current human society on earth, you will see more than just bad guys being shot: You will see happy moments, happy families, happy people. Peaceful deaths, sometimes happy ones, I’m sure.
Maybe our planet has more than one function, there are prisoners, but there are developing souls, experienced ones, etc.

I stated in the comments sections that i was in tune with both views on this. I also believe that we live in this black and white ecosystem, contrast, polarity, because if their are oppressive beings then from our point of view they are for us the bad et's, but if there is bad energy then that means (as you point it) there is also good et's, good energy, so in of itself automatically there is contrast, however i also put the several tones of gray that exist due to different types of agenda from different beings, we've already saw that in one of the rv projects about an UAP footage where there was beings communicating with humans from the SSP and one of the things they told while the viewers asked them why they were working with the oppressive they respond "this is a very complex topic so please don't judge us, there is much you'll don't know".
In this notion i also point out that we cannot suddenly change our point of view just because some person/people/being told us or showed us another point of view, doesn't mean however we'll not learn from it, but this is something many in this forum try to do while discussing different narratives, to try to put things into perspective according to each belief system and what we as a collective believe to be the truth or at least try to be aware of the Truth, we don't simply change our philosophy just because someone told us something unless after a critical thinking one's is in alignment with that truth. Azis always talks about the free will beings as much as Courtney did and then suddenly there's a change of perspective just because... and it's ok, no problem with that, im also aligned with it, just let us not forget of putting the analytical and mind into perspective before simply jumping into conclusions (don't know, however, if this was the case with Azis im just assuming here based on the session today), im also talking to myself in this matter, it's very easy to let us emotionally attached to some frequency.
I also agreed with the paper session, to show us more of it not only the light board.
However in terms of the narrative i'll never reject their points of view on this, all of it comes from years of data and also involvements with other groups and therefore their belief system around it, not to mention what we don't know due to the fact there is for years telepathic communications in those projects so there is a lot a paper session or a light board that simply wont be reveal not because they don't want to but because it is something that you simply can't describe, i remember Yemmée talking about this after the death traps i believe, still with all of this, this is something we are constantly talking about, to put every question on the table.

I can appreciate a cinematic presentation, admittedly some assumptions are made. Mind you, still far more objective than the sick MSM trash of today.

Would be nice if these projects were accompanied by "white papers" which would basically be a pdf of all the paper sessions put together

I would like to see whatever paper session data can be shown, and the process that formed the conclusion from that data as well.
But maybe I'm putting the cart before the horse...
This will be a four-part Project, so I guess it needs all its components - all the data combined from the Remote Viewers, to see the picture.

I thought the video interaction between Courtney and Aziz was a little different also.
I would have liked to have heard Aziz's thoughts - basically for Aziz to explain the data that he had within his knowing, that wasn't in the session. I thought there was more that he wanted to explain now that the Target had been revealed.
I felt Courtney had had time to conclude the data, but Aziz was in an expanding realization about the Target once he heard it. I felt there was more that Aziz could have contributed, being the one who was the viewer, and that he was assessing and processing other data in his mind.
There seemed an element of pushback and frustration from Aziz.
I would have liked to have heard his thoughts - I would have like to have seen the from the Paper sessions, where those additional connections were coming from. There seemed to be something else there - another connection, aspect or viewing point that needed to come into the equation.

I thought it was an outstanding session though.
I guess we all have our own standalone conclusions as well.
I feel we are blessed to be given such insight, regardless.
Thanks Aziz and Courtney.

"There seemed an element of pushback and frustration from Aziz."

Yes, very definitely!

I felt Courtney was *pushing* his agenda (interpretation) onto Aziz' data, and Aziz wasn't agreeing with it. For all of CB talking about 'Scientific' Remote Viewing, this doesn't align with real science... trying to make data fit into a pre-conceived agenda or idea.

Personally, I really didn't like Yeme's introduction or ending. Someone in the comments said it was 'patronising'. I found it far too... emotive. Trying to play on the heartstrings... melodramatic (not to say that the situation doesn't call for some extreme emotions - but I felt it was poured on so thick... it was palpable).

@Arnoldo (damn, the 'reply' button is stuffing up again!!! Damn you, Vimeo!)

It would be good to see all sessions done - but other than just giving the paper sessions, it would be *HOURS* of video if you wanted to see how all of it developed.

Personally, one thing I really want to know is the *precise* wording of the task, and exactly what gets said to the viewers, and when.... The RVers seem to have a rather amazing amount of knowledge regarding what targets to look for - how many subjects, how many events, how many foci (which is the correct word, not 'focuses'). It doesn't seem as completely blind as is made out - there appears to be *some* front-loading going on!

But, personally, I wouldn't mind seeing all sessions video-recorded and made available (even if they do run into the many hours).

Certainly, I'd like to see the opening of the sessions - the ideograms and how they're interpreted...

You are right. I have access to a great remote viewer, i can confirm most of the things that farsight did on my own research, but there is not just "death traps" and reptilians after death.

Things are more complex. There are different systems for different beings. The reptilians are not allowed to get everyone, there are rules they also follow.

The death trap is true, but farsight also kind of blind to only the negative and conspiracy part of the universe, and this affect what they get. There is no 100% blind remote viewing.

Making a short summary, the reincarnation system and no memory is not a reptilian creation, our system got kind of hacked by the reptilians and abused by them. It is more like a Gang coming to a city and taking over some parts of the city. It is not like the reptilians have created and own the entire city.

This is my experience on remote viewing life after death and other stuff. Offcourse, i can be wrong, farsight can be wrong, but we all need to follow what is most probable at the momment.

Y'know, I reached out to Courtney several years ago and asked for raw data.

And to his credit, he did release all the raw session data for Pyramids and Atlantis, AFAIK.

I still haven't done the analysis between viewers on them. I was hoping somebody else would twig and do it.

Perhaps that's what the man is waiting for, somebody to step up to the plate and do raw analysis.

Shirkers and light weights need not apply. It's a horribly involved job. But, kind of satisfying to complete.