This first installment describes a progressively bizarre and perplexing set of circumstances.
We have elements of our gov't that are actively targeting, shooting down, collecting technology and delivering survivors to certain demise. If these "good ET" pilots understand this risk, more questions are raised:
* With such risk and if they are limited in what they can do, what ARE they doing here? What are their activities?
* Is it possible to rescue these crash survivors?
Once we have a better explanation from Harvey et al of what their definition of "catastrophic disclosure" is, along with what their "check list" includes, we might also be instructed about what "we" here can realistically and meaningfully do. The circumstances feel like "we" the imprisoned in a state of waiting-to-exhale.
The term "catastrophic disclosure" deserves further elaboration from the perspective of the "good ETs". What does their interpretation of "catastrophic disclosure" look like specifically? We may all be vying for the same end result, but with different expectations. Since it appears that the "good ETs" are the deciding factor here in terms of when they will get directly involved, wouldn't be helpful that "we" here are better informed?
(how the "good ETs" define "free will" is unusual and is not something I and others agree with)
Once we understand what the "good ETs" have for expectations of "catastrophic disclosure" we might feel more empowered, especially if there is anything "we" here can realistically and meaningfully do. We "humans" tend to do better in numbers.
Note, I don't mean just learning remote viewing, photography and keeping the discussion going; those are important, but what else can we do? This otherwise feels like a perpetual state of "waiting to exhale" as the powers in this world operate, out of our sight, and we continue to learn just how bizarre our existence really is. It can result in a sense of powerlessness for some.
More to discuss as the next installments of this series are released.