Is it just me or is it partly just the serene and happy faces that throw me off.

All these channelers and contactees and stuff. Advertising their YouTube's and Instagram and etc with like this happy dreamy picture and these happy esoteric loving pictures.

I am so much more inclined to believe someone that looks a little bit miserable, going "bitch, you're in a prison planet" (sorry for the swear)

I'm probably being premature. But . . . if they post a bunch of happy pictures in their psychic power advertisements . . . on this planet . . . I don't believe it.

I do appreciate she says trap though. Instead of "oh, everything's gonna be solved, and everything's great and you just need to chill"

I personally believe the vast majority of them are full of you know what.Just sayin. Discernment is definitely required.

LOL, hahaha, thanks for that, that's such a great observation man, so cool, ha, thanks for that. Now I feel all dreamy becuz that thought hits me a lot too. I think we're gonna be all right. :)

@Tazz

It's red pill vs blue pill. I think of it as awakened vs. denial. Most people with shit themselves if they really understood what is going on. It's a coping mechanism to be in a "sweetness and light" persona all of the time.

It's VERY complicated. But you just keep on doing you John, whatever works for you.

Yeah, but I'm keeping my 3-ply toilet paper. I swear I am not coming back to this rock in a period where it's all corn cobs. Just ain't doing it!

This chick is so full of it. And John, you think she's legit? Seriously? And aren't you the guy who is all over the place claiming you have everything figured out? Dude. So what I get from this is you literally have no sense of discernment at all.

Lol far beyond you little one. You're not even worth my time replying to.

The best teacher I ever had had one constant question for any claim - "Where's your evidence?" (it didn't matter if you were right or wrong. What matters is that your claims are backed up with some reasonable evidence, thought and logic).

So, where's the evidence of anything she's saying? Especially her bio at the beginning - "I'm in contact with the Archangel Michael"... well, where's the evidence of this?

(actually, I suspected I was going to get really frustrated and annoyed with her - and the Telstar and 'Archangel Michael bit really didn't help her... However, I tolerated past that and actually didn't mind it... too much ;p)

However.... I'm at the 35min mark, and wondering what Richard is so upset about... (I won't say I agree with everything - there are interpretational differences, however, ultimately it's all pretty much what I think/believe. Certainly the whole "you are not your physical body" is so important, and I didn't think it was all that controversial here)

She does have a weird style. At times I'm not too fond of it because it almost feels like she's a mother trying to talk to the audience as her children, but the more you listen to her the more things make sense. As to where the information comes from...I think she has to be upfront as to who she is in contact with so as to not break Free Will by putting out this information. I'm very much against all AI so I'm not that happy when she announces the whole TELSTAR thing as well as Michael I know is Enlil. Yet, I listen and then move on. As Amitakh Stanford used to say "take what is useful and discard the rest". Everything has some use for us even if not everything has 100% use.