Dear Courtney,
I hope this message finds you well. I recently heard your proclamation regarding the extraterrestrial directive of “no more secrets.” However, I must address a fundamental contradiction in terms that arises when juxtaposing this statement with the continued veil of secrecy under the rationale of “open disclosures being against the free will protocol.”
If the principle of “no more secrets” is to hold true, then it cannot coexist with the act of withholding first-hand evidence under any guise. Rationalizing second-hand experiences and data as the “principle truth” undermines the directive itself. Truth cannot be secondary or rationalized through filters if the aim is full transparency.
This contradiction seems to erode the integrity of the message being delivered. The very essence of “no more secrets” necessitates openness and directness, particularly when dealing with transformative revelations of this nature.
I urge you to consider this paradox carefully. Transparency, if it is to be genuine, must start with dismantling the barriers that obscure direct evidence from reaching those it concerns. Anything less risks diluting the power and purpose of the directive you so fervently advocate. I am a long time supporter of FARSIGHT
Sincerely,
Rod