I just became aware of farsight within the last week and started watching content. There is a mix of good and poorly vetted topics.

The "Recording UFOs basic camera setup" appears to be one of the poorly vetted topics. Although infrared can detect many things outside of the visible spectrum, the steps and images listed in this episode are pretty poorly interpreted.

The two "UFO" images presented in the episode appear to be:
1) An insect fluttering about. Many species of butterfly, flutter-wing fly, and flying termites have this behavior. How many you see will depend on the local insect population.
2) A spiderweb glistening in the air. Many spiders create these, the US East Coast had a news worthy outbreak of them in 2023.

Adding a 3rd 'human visible light' camera to the setup would help image analysis and determining if these are capturing purely IR data or just misinterpretations of normal phenomenon. Stereo vision software or or photogrammetry techniques would allow determining the distance to an object. Also a greater distance between the cameras would allow for more accurate distance calculations for objects further away from the cameras. Many specialized tools and experts in photogrammetry would be able to easily assist setting up and vetting a more scientifically viable camera rig.

While the camera setup could be done better, the remote viewing sessions show that there is more than just some bugs flying around. Also, most of the recordings were made in winter time.

Here's the RV sessions:

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/uaps-ufos
➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/identified-flying-objects

The "spiderweb":

➡️ https://www.farsightprime.com/videos/mysteries-61-spiderweb-ufo

Hi Tim, Thanks for your post and interest in Farsight.
Please take advantage of the instructional material for learning RV. Courtney always stresses we can learn this skill and see if what they are saying is true. Even if we can’t get to that level (like me but trying) you can at least validate the science by correctly “seeing” remote targets - Eiffel Tower, pyramids, sailboat on a lake, etc) when you practice. Gives me more confidence in what the team says but always remain skeptical.
With regard to recording UFOs using infrared, we have moved well past that and not needed. I did have success with using infrared but nothing like I am getting simply using my camera/phone without that lens. As Courtney says they fill our skies and want to be seen. It’s just an issue of looking up during day or night. Used to point camera to daytime sky in slo mo (240fps) to capture the fast moving objects then playback at normal speed. However now they travel much slower or simply hover in position. Point and click.
Have followed Courtney since 2000 when I read Cosmic Voyage. He is sincere, helpful, trustworthy and responsive to criticism - a bit too much as far as I believe. When he says massive ships will be appearing I expect they will and continue to look up. Most people don’t.
Anyway welcome to Farsight.
Larry

You are seriously arguing that they're insects . . .

Thanks for the additional links. Remote viewing provides additional data, but from a scientific perspective, must provide a way for others to test and replicate the experiment.

The spiderweb ufo focuses on the body lengths/second. That is a very inaccurate measure of speed by itself.
Small insects can move at very fast body length/second speeds when account movement speed + wind speed and can exceed 600.
Small wind vortices can change direction very fast and affect insects compared to larger craft with higher mass and inertia.
Excluding the remote viewing data, there is not enough information to conclude it is anything other than insects and spiderwebs.
To get valid data, I would want 3 cameras - 2 IR cameras at least 3ft apart and 1 visible light camera within 3 ft of them and then use basic trigonometry and photogrammetry to determine the distance to the object and absolute speed instead of the very inaccurate body lengths/second speed.