I've been following farsight for some time and have seen just about every video available on vimeo/youtube. I'm on board with this as being valid information but I always have a couple questions left over. Hopefully someone can clue me in.

1. Can you remote view fiction? Like if the target was PeterPan? If so, is there a way to know the difference?
2. Is it possible that the remote viewer is picking up an alternate universe/timeline that isn't ours or may not pertain to us? Like maybe these death traps exist, but not here?

Although I find this all to be real, I'm super hesitant to watch the training videos.. I get this ouija board is bad, don't invite the vampire into your home kinda feeling. So I apologize if I just haven't done the research and the the answers are there.
Also suggestion, forum organization if it already isn't in the works. It would be nice to see comments per project, other threads on how they tie in. Maybe general section on RV questions/controls?
Thanks!

Just figured out how to see forum topics. Disregard the suggestion :)

im not 100% sure of these, but i see it's been 16 days and no response

I do believe you can remote view fiction, but if what i learned from technical intuition is correct you could also end up seeing an author at a table writing a novel....so maybe it depends on the styling of the target. For example...maybe if u were looking at the film pulp fiction depending on the way the target is structured the person may see the film, the narrative, the characters, etc ...or maybe they will see the actors on set, quentin tarantino, people going back to their dressing rooms

In my view and developing understanding, it seems we live in a universe of superposition...innumerable possibilities, which is why remote viewing seems to have been intended to be done in groups. taking many viewers data into consideration rather than just 1 helps to collect popular data points which can raise the likelihood of hits whether its past oriented or future. Also it helps to reduce analytical overlays by collating many data points across many viewers.

RV interests me because at it's heart is this intent for tactical implementation. So at its heart it was structured to be pragmatic which means it is supposed to be USED. It was intended to be used as a tool for intelligence gathering. The perfect meeting point between the psychic mysteries of the ancient world and the ever skeptical modern world.

This is why it's important to have targets that can be validated. Not only to calculate the general accuracy of the viewers but to actually USE the data.

Kyle, are you suggesting that they RV the book itself? If so, that’s an excellent way to validate the information contained.

yea i guess i am....movie, book, etc....if u can rv a location and get validation why not other targets as well

I think it would be an excellent idea. The remote viewers have likely by now found out about the book though so it wouldn’t be a blind target. I’m not sure how that would work but we definitely need more information. Didn’t Courtney say he was going to do a follow up?

Dick Allgire made up a 'place' in his mind and tasked it. The RVers described the 'location' just as Dick 'imagined' it. Yes fiction can be viewed. That is why the 'tasking' is so important. If the tasking assumes something 'imaginary' as real and its not ---- RV has to go to where ever it has to books, movies, peoples minds to provide the 'results'. So when Courtney tasks something that is 'not valid' they go down 'rabbit holes' to get the information!!!