You are indoctrinated by religion, there is no hell or heaven. People want to believe that someone or something is going to save them. That there is some "good" god that will win the battle against evil or satan. The priomordial thing is consciousness. You can do wahetever you want with that.

If you are interested in this force you only need to do pendulum work...it is a mistake to bet on the answers you get. It is said that those who are sensitive or intuitive are targeted by unseen forces. We travel this murky habitat searching but not finding most of what we find is left for us to mislead us. We need to live within our hearts and dance to the beat of our higher-self.

How time has changed..at one time people who saw visions were tied up and baked...I guess we should be careful who we talk to. Nobody wants to be part of a weeny roast or slapped around by some good book packing thumper!

Intresting what you say, I came to the same conclusion, that people who sensitive, are targeted.
Probably our Higher self will not lead us astray. But we cant beat our Higher self with a rote procedure, and expect to get an answer, it drops things subtly, in its own time and way.

Norman, have you watched the latest Farsight production Death Trap yet? It has a lot to say about the issues of which you speak. I'm not a religious person, though I was brought up Catholic (the extremely harsh treatment I was subjected to by the nuns and priests cured me of religion for good!). but I do find it interesting that the description of the afterlife in Death Trap seemed to me to have a lot in common with how Western monotheistic religions portray heaven and hell. Interesting indeed, but I haven't yet decided if that makes me more - or less - inclined to believe the information presented in Death Trap. As is happening a lot in newer philosophies, the paradigm is shifted from God vs. Satan to friendly aliens vs. hostile aliens. Personally I like to just take it all in without making judgments or conclusions, as these tend to close one off from further information and consideration.

It seems the way the death traps have been described is the religions have convinced billions of people that heaven will be a bright light and to go toward it and it will be a wonderful feeling... until you get to the real destination.

Yes, I have reviewed it. As a RVer I agree with some and disagree with other parts, based on RV and psychic work. I agree 'reincarnation' is what we 'spiritual beings' do. I disagree that any 'aliens' have any significant part in our 'reincarnation'. I still agree a Source/God/Divine being in charge of what is gong on 'everywhere'. I seem to have 'strong beliefs' ---- but they are still beliefs as even 'experiences' are hard to prove!!

There is a level that observes all of our actions and may occasionally supply a stray thought which some people call "spirit guides" and Robert Monroe called Level 10 and Hollywood calls "The Adjustment Bureau" in the movie with Matt Damon and Emily Blount. Most if not all of our restrictions to information are self imposed at an unconscious level. We are in all likelyhood too funny watching to be worth interfering with. The Bard was right, "Life is but a stage" so let's ham it up in the assurance that we too will laugh at all of the stumbling and mumbling going on down here when it is our time to be amused.

I think of the unconscious restrictions you speak of as ingrained and inflexible belief systems. They attempt to form a coherent mental construct that aids a finite mind in dealing with the infinite reality. The more reinforced they are, the stronger they will (have to!) ignore anything that contradicts the construct. I think of enlightenment in terms of recognizing and combating the restrictions that belief systems can impose if there is no opening for new information or further development. Such is the struggle in advancing mentally (as opposed to biologically) evolving life, as is the case with humanity.

Mental evolution can go at the speed of light when compared to the biological counterpart. It's analogous to electronics in the difference between the development of hardware vs. software. A couple lines of code can do things it would take months or years to achieve in a hardware-only environment, just as an idea can advance -- or do a lot of damage to -- humanity, virtually overnight.

... clearly exposes RV as obsolete.

Just to add another perspective: There is plenty of circumstantial, available evidence -- whether or not one agrees with it -- that 9/11 and JFK should rightly be seriously questioned as conspiracies, and not mere "conspiracy theory". That can never be the case with ancient events...unless time machines someday become a reality. But in all of the cases being discussed a level of flexibility in one's belief systems is required in order to be open to non-mainstream thinking. Personally I believe such flexibility is essential if one is to even begin to see reality as it is. Deception appears to be one of the fundamental consequences of consciousness and intelligence. If nothing else, uncovering deception offers the truth seeker a path forward in the quest for mental evolution, though not a simple one.

There are other methodologies like Hypnosis that have been used to ask questions and get information. The books of Michael Newton are an example but there are many others. The information this provides seems objective because the same information comes from many different people who were not in contact with each other. And some of it could be verified, he looked up someones past life and found such a person did exist. But for example the info Newton got contradicts what remote viewing gets. I'm not saying one method is better than the other, all I'm saying is we shouldnt accept information like this at face value.

The issue with Michael Newton or someone like Brian Weiss's approach is that their interpretation of reality is mostly influenced by the 'channelled masters'.

They would show up and interfer with the session (interestingly enough at the moment of in between lives). They would then replace the subject and answer questions on their behalf (which seems very narcissitic to me). It is all about why we are here and the necessity of growth through multiple lives blablabla. The casual Eastern and South Asian dogma about how reincarnation is our fault, we are not enough, and that we need to keep dissolving karma (obviously it is not said this way, but that's what it is in a nutshell)

By definition, I never trust channelled information. RV keeps the subject online and conscious, as a direct witness of the target: witnessing both the objective landscape at hand and the actors who are trying to interfer be it malevolent or benevolent (channelled masters and what not).

That's where the difference lie.

Memory retrieval is easier in a hypnotic state: but the therapist needs to be aware of interferences and not give them any space to speak on behalf of the patient. It is the opposite that needs to happen: empower the patient to stay online and describe the truth of the encounter. Which often than not is covert, abusive and patronizing, and takes the therapist off course.

Good therapists do a good job when it comes to isolating and healing human to human abusive relationships. It is no different with those off world entities.

Interestingly I dont trust channeled information either. But Hypnosis and channelling arent the only ways to get information. For example there are many people who are proficient at astral traveling. They are conscious and aware. Their info mostly contradicts Courtneys findings too.
And there are other methods as well.
I dont want to make it about which method is better, but how do you know the perceptions of remote viewers arent influenced? These are public projects, a lot of people watch them hopefully, so there is an incentive to influence them. Everyone believes their method is the one that provides accurate info.

Also the way Courtney defines the target for this project shows he already have many preconceived notions about it from the book he read, so by the definition he used, narrowed the range of what remote viewers could have perceived.