Hey Adrian, I hope you are well. This is my last post in this thread. So this post is a long one.
You created this thread, so I am posting here to apologize to you for an incident that took place here a couple of days ago.
I received two science papers from a common friend of both of us through the links that she had posted on this thread. These papers somehow deal with 5G, 60GHz, and the SAR covid-2 virus. I personally have no interest in 5G and 60GHz. But I decided to review these papers to do a favor for our common friend who is very focused on these three elements.
Someone in this forum (subject 1) had mockingly called me Dr. Claude. He was wrong because, as you obviously know, Claude is not my last name, it is part of my first name. But although subject 1 was mocking me, he was absolutely right to call me doctor because I have two doctorates in science and more…. Therefore, I am very well qualified to review science papers and lecture in science topics if I so desire.
I reviewed the two science papers as it is done when scientific publications are reviewed. And the conclusion that I reached was that the papers did not show any link/relationship whatsoever between 5G/60GHz and the SAR covid-2 virus. In addition, one of the paper was really an ad piece with some dubious science; therefore it is not a scientific paper in the traditional way. But I read it and was truly generous in my review…
The conclusions that I reached in the review had nothing to do with our common friend who provided the links for these papers. How could she be responsible for the sloppy work presented in those papers? She did not write them for God sake! The authors wrote them; consequently my review was reflective of their scientific knowledge, skills and understanding.
But somehow, subject 1 wrote and has been writing all over that I had ripped our common friend up! And he had to defend her!
In reality, I felt that I was doing her a favor by telling her the TRUTH, that the papers did not show a link/relationship between 5G/60GHz and the SAR covid-2 virus. But I also added that it did not mean that a link might not exist. But more work needs to be done to show the link.
After I posted the paper review, our common friend posted a David Ickes’ video on covid-19…etc. I mistakenly thought that this video was addressed to me specifically because we had been communicating about covid-19, 5G and 60GHz but I was partly wrong. The video was not addressed to me specifically, it was addressed to the whole forum.
Nevertheless, thinking that David Ickes’ video was addressed to me, I wrote a post where I nicely explained the process used in science to get accurate information. I felt that I had to talk about this process, to explain why this video and the internet in general, are not the places that I (or anyone in science) would go to get the accurate information needed to make decisions on science matters. I did not want our friend to keep wasting her time providing me links, videos…from the internet that I was not going to use.
Immediately after I submitted the paper review post, I submitted a second one where I simply told our friend that for the time being, my attention and focus are not on 5G and 60GHz. I had forgotten to add this detail in the paper review post. I live in a small community where the internet is temperamental and not always reliable. So, I did not see the post that our friend had probably submitted at the same time when I sent my second post. And in her post she was telling me that David Ickes’ video was not addressed to me only but to the whole forum.
It was about 2 hours later that I saw our friend’s post, and I immediately apologized but I was busy and did not put her name in the post. I also saw subject 1 nasty post to me, and I decided to ignore it. I was busy. Sometime later, I saw more nasty posts from subject 1. I then put an addendum to my apology, and specified that the apology was specifically for our friend. Subject I had assumed that I was apologizing to him because my apology had appeared below his post. And this was followed with more nasty posts. Later on, I submitted a second post specifying again that my apology was addressed to our friend. I have no problem admitting my mistakes but I will never apologize for something that I didn’t do.
Prior to this situation with the paper review post, there was a series of incidents (insults and name calling…) with subject 1. In short, I was being berated and called names for not understanding or for missing important facts in science related to covid-19 and its virus, SAR covid-2! I just laughed, and mainly ignored the insults and snappy remarks, or gave some relatively mild counter-punches. But I decided to do something more forceful when for the second time, subject 1 jumped uninvited in an interaction that I was having with someone else, and in this situation with subject 2.
I FELT THAT SUBJECT 1 WAS TROLLING ME. AND IT HAD TO STOP.
Therefore, I made it very clear to him that I would reply forcefully each time that he would mention my name or refer to me in his posts. And I did. However, ultimately, I used quite a lot of restraint in my replies… I guess we can say that it seems to be working so far.
As subject 2 wrote in his second post related to this incident, indeed we had a brief interaction a couple of weeks ago after the Death Traps video was released. At that time, we were all trying to get a good grasp on this topic so that we could decide what to do after we transition in this life.
As of now, my position is that I will not come back on earth after this life. I’m not interested in having my mind wipe out again and become a milking cow for the demiurge who controls life on earth with his extended deceptive supporting acolytes. Some members of this forum feel otherwise, and would like to reincarnate here again and that’s perfectly fine, Free Will obliges.
I don’t have the fine details of my interaction with subject 2 but I definitely remember his initial posts as being quite forceful and inappropriate, with a tinge of religious undertone and correctness. Essentially, he had some interesting questions that only he could answer, if he had done his homework. In a nutshell (and yes I do say that !!), he was sort of asking to be convinced why he should not reincarnate on earth after this life, the reason been that he currently has a good life, so coming back was a good alternative.
Fine, I said to myself, you asked me a good question, I would give you a good an answer. I told him that I was very happy to hear that he has a good life now. And I added that in his next incarnation on earth after this life, he would be born a dalit in India. And I would then be very interested to hear how he likes his life.
As he said in your thread, I suppose he got intimidated and got back to me after a while and told me something like: I realize that you don’t want to hear other people’s opinions. I dismissed him because I really did not want to hear his opinion. Then, I had an insight that prompted me to reply to his post. And I told him that I believe that he was a good person (and I still do) and that’s why I was contacting him. I explained that I was not interested in initiating a dialog that would take us nowhere. That it would be a waste of time for both of us.
I don't have to, but I will explain why I was not interested in have a dialog with subject 2. I'm just not interested in interacting with people who have no compassion or care for other people. In my experience, people who tell you “I’m doing well” usually also imply “I don’t give a f..k if a child is dying of starvation in a country where there is a civil war or whatever... I'm doing well and that's what matters. F..k everyone else". And if these egocentric "salauds" want to come back here and reincarnate, so be it. It is not my responsibility to convince them to change their minds. Free Will obliges.
Anyway, I completely forgot that interaction with subject 2. And a couple of days ago when he asked me why I, who “lectures” everyone about science, was posting a video by the notoriously unscientific Linda Moulton Howe. I did not recognize him at all, and simply told him that I do not lecture anyone about anything at all, and certainly not about science because this is not a science forum.
And I added that most of my posts are about OBE, rv and esoteric stuff. Therefore, it is appropriate for me to post LMH and The Moore Show videos here unless Courtney Brown feels otherwise. It was then that subject 1 immediately jumped in and started trashing me again. And at that point, I decided to put a stop in his trolling intrusions. And, after a day or so, subject 2 wrote a post about his prior interaction with me, and he called me a bully. That was when I remembered that I had interacted with him.
I’m certainly not a bully but I will defend myself forcefully if attacked.
One thing that I would like to say to subject 1 and 2 and those who seem to believe that I’m "lecturing" them is to make good use of the Law of Free Will by ignoring my posts. I don’t force you to read my posts, and you will not offend me at all if you ignore them, I do that all the time. But conversely, I can guarantee that no one will be allowed to infringe on my Free Will. I will write what I want to write, and how I want to write it, and will stop only if CB, the owner and sole moderator of this forum, asks me to do so.
It is because of this type of silliness, stupidity and childishness that I don’t do forum. This is not my life. I will no longer post in this thread so that those who consider this thread to be the life line needed for their existence can get all the oxygen that they need.
Subject 1 = Larry. Subject 2 = Robert Sorenson, I believe.