Hi all,

Just saw the sessions. I would like to thank the viewers for their amazing effort.

It was good to have somebody present at the actual place of happenings, and we got some good data back. However to say that we now have a better understanding of the whole situation then, would be to stretch it. That said, I would like to have access to the original paper-sessions, so that I myself can have a chance to deduce on what what seen.

We got some flashbacks into certain periods, and into the emotional and mental state of the targets, but not the historical frame or the backdrop of the period. It somehow felt disjointed.

Well, I will watch it again and try to see if I can pick more up, and correlate with existing information.

It was however very enthralling to see Aziz get so emotional remote viewing Sekmet! Really gold. 😀

I don't agree with Courney's last summarization. We have no evidence whatsoever that we are talking about the same person or Entity. Even if they were the same entity, we cannot deduce that they the channeled entity is evil. It would be like remote viewing Hitler in his life in WWII and perhaps eons later as a different being. There would be little correlation.

If the channeled material is correct, the Ra that is channeled is a mid-sixth density being that is on such a high level of development that we cannot fathom it.

I've noticed that Courtney is being enveloped in this LIfe trap theory, which by the way isn't fully researched, that it could bleed into the sessions. Be careful of that, Courtney. For what is worth it, you could be the one that is influenced by "evil spirits" into deranging quality material that could help the humanity evolve.

Perhaps you could make yourself a target and see if you are being influenced.

*added later:

There is a possibility that some of the remote viewers are picking up on other timelines or other planets in other dimensions. We have no way of knowing where their consciousness goes to in these sessions. We have seen many times that big catastrophic predictions from remote viewers never happen, at least not in our timeline or dimension, so we need to develop the remote viewing process so that we can ensure that we are looking at our own timeline - even if we are looking "back in time".

Seth, asked about Atlantis, said that it was a construct of our own and that we "created" it in the "past". After it is created, who can say that it hasn't happened? We live in a very complex universe, one of infinitely many, and we haven't got a grasp on how they are interconnected if they are at all.

Relistening to Princess' session, she described a great explosion. We know that some of the grand monuments have visible damage on usually one side, and traces of great heat exposure. (see fx. Colossi of Memnon). This could be the explosion that Princess saw, which damaged not only monuments in Egypt but also in South America. It must have been a world war.

Robert Schoch the famous geologist, thought that it could be a result of a big sun plasma event, but I think this war is more probable.

https://hiddenincatours.com/largest-sculpture-world-ramesseum-egypt/

A little about Ra and Hathor:

"I don't agree with Courney's last summarization. We have no evidence whatsoever that we are talking about the same person or Entity. . . . If the channeled material is correct, the Ra that is channeled is a mid-sixth density being that is on such a high level of development that we cannot fathom it."

Thank you for this post. I just finished watching it and have pretty much the same feelings. In fact, I was noticing that some of the actual descriptions of "Ra" seem to contradict each other, and at times it is very confusing which entity is being described. Is he a short man with small eyes in his mid-40s, warlike and aggressive? Or is he a tall, large-eyed, otherworldly being, telepathic and all-seeing? At least Kahmia's session seems to indicate that there may have been good intentions from this very "consciously aware" being looking at the bigger picture, though the contact was corrupted and misunderstood. Just as was demonstrated in the Bashar session, humans fear what they can't understand.

I had a feeling that this project would pick up on a negative entity, and therefore disparage any mention of Ra, even the channelings of the Law of One. But we cannot make blanket generalizations with such ambiguous, narrowly-focused data. Courtney, if you are going to imply that anyone who believes the Ra Material are simply "stupid humans" then a project specifically on the source of the channelings may be warranted (without any leading target suggestions). Only then would I believe such a presumptuous, borderline-arrogant statement. Your own work in Cosmic Voyage seems to dovetail quite nicely with what is said in the book, by the way.

For what it's worth, the Ra of the Law of One claims that their contact with Egypt was largely perverted. They admit to mistakes made in the past, for they didn't know how humans would react to direct contact. But forming religions and being worshipped as Gods is the exact opposite(!) of what they claim to have wanted. Reading the material, I do not sense any ego. Moreover, the supposed reason for transmitting the material is to assist in humanity's evolution, for their distorted contact ended up causing harm in the long run (they DO admit to this) and thus it is their karmic duty in a sense to serve and assist, cleaning up for their past mistakes.

I'd highly recommend everyone to actually read the Law of One and come to your own judgments from the material itself. Because clearly it does not seem like the same entity spanning these sessions. At the very least, we can in no way affirm that the source of the Law of One (who is all about preserving free will) is the same controlling entity that appeared to be targeted. Choice and freedom for every individual is one of the Law of One's biggest themes. And any suggestion of inherent superiority goes against the material's central message -- the very oneness of all consciousness.

On the other hand, making negative judgments based on simple channeling suggestions (in response to asking how to make the channel more comfortable) seems extremely unfounded. I would like to know if Courtney even read the whole thing.

Finally, I must thank Aziz for how hard he made me laugh. That was absolute gold and made the project worth watching. Even if I don't agree with everything, I still have to thank Courtney and the Farsight Team for their fantastic work over the years.

PS, this is not a stupid human ;) https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2qqtyc

You made some very good points there! I agree.

Too short - I need more. :-)

What a game-changer in terms of our understanding of Ancient Egypt though.

Honestly, there may be a slight bias (the very nature of the targets imply rebellion & punishment) but I think it is more of a misunderstanding combined with premature judgment.

One of the most important points I've failed to mention is that the "Ra" of the Law of One does not identify itself as a singular individual. Once a certain stage of evolution is reached, like-minded beings come together to form what is termed a "social memory complex," a telepathic unity much like cells within a body, with experience and memory of every individual. Hence Ra is more of a collective than a lone ego. There is a reason why some of the best channelers (such as Bashar or Abraham) almost always refer to themselves as "we." Indeed, the Ra collective comprises perhaps several millions of individuals combined into one entity. (This was also picked up on in the remote viewing of the "Blue Avian" being by the team at Technical Intuition).

And wouldn't you know -- Ra of the Law of One even states that some of the individuals within the Ra collective were once of negative polarity, defined by deception, manipulation, and service-to-self. But there is always forgiveness -- beings are given the opportunity to change and be allowed into the social memory complex. In fact, Ra states that at some point in the service-to-self (negative) path, beings invariably realize that they must switch polarities, for there is no further growth that can be gained on the negative path. After much internal struggle, they reunify with the positive polarity in the long road towards reunion with Source. This is accomplished around mid-sixth density; Ra is a sixth density social memory complex "himself," meaning that duality has been transcended, and there is no ego.

What Courtney seems to be doing is projecting our own limited human egoic understanding on something that might be indescribably complex, as Kahmia put it. There is a lot more research to be done before we can make such definitive judgments about the Ra of the Law of One. But for a supposed negative entity, he does seem to frown upon the negative path, implying that beings on that path cannot see the bigger picture of unified systems. There is even mention that if service-to-self beings do not eventually switch polarities, they might face soul dissolution.

I don't see the Law of One as being all that "New Agey," by the way. New Age material tends to only focus on the positive, while Ra talks a lot about negative influence and the manipulation of society by service-to-self elites, who have made connections with negative beings. I find Bashar and Abraham (both of whom Courtney admires) to be even more New Agey than the Law of One. Within the first couple of sessions, Ra takes responsibility for the contact in the past and seems to only wish to assist and serve. Like it or not, that material has helped a lot of people.

Is this Ra the same Ra from the Law of One books? Guys, session 1 first book. Yes, it's the same. But it's not an individual. Ra appeared as many.

Imagine our group of relatively well-read people came down on a "primitive" group of humans, we'd be perceived as a collective. Those of us who would be seen as extra smart, would be chosen as important leader of sorts. We might not agree amongst ourselves on many levels and we're certainly quite different. We are kind of a unit though also. We are of almost the same level of awareness even. We wouldn't all speak the exact same wisdom and our attempts to teach would vary greatly. It would be a big mess to those folks we chose to visit. But we’d mean well, in our ignorance.

Ra did the same. They came to teach the Law of One. Meant well, but they themselves were still distorted. They noticed their mistake in appearing and being perceived as "other". So they removed themselves leaving a big mess. After they'd disappeared, their message was further distorted by the barbaric humans, so Ra fully admit their mistakes. They've been trying to make amends for this. If this still seems quite negative, then why bother helping humanity later through works such as Law of One?

Well, it's not as simple as this.

In addition to this, the model presented by Ra is essentially that of fracturing of consciousness. We are portions of them in their past. We are a multitude of little parts of their consciousness, so they must turn us into something greater, otherwise they themselves are not. God perceiving Self.

"[...] The one Being of the creation is like unto a body, if you will accept this third-density analogy.
Would we ignore a pain in the leg?
A bruise upon the skin?
A cut which is festering.
No."

It's not "them" and "us". I know many people have a hard time grasping this because of programming and the individual nature of experience in third density. In this model, there is no separation. What happens when you remote view things? You're certainly not using your eyes. You're using the capacities of a higher aspect of yourself that transcends the rules of this world. Strange. Keep going, You're going to end up realizing that higher aspects of yourself are aware of, and also shaping all of this world (ESP and Manifestation are just the start) (see Co-creators).These aspects can appear to you as “other” if that's your current level of learning.

Basically, all detailed channeled material kind of paints this same picture.

The question remains: Why can't we then just be totally free and run naked over some meadows? I'd encompass this in this same model by saying that higher and quite negative aspects of ourselves have entrapped us and will attempt to recycle us. These aspects are negative seen from “below”, but they are still US. Seen eye to eye, they will not be negative. Which is what Ra have been saying. Sixth density = blending of wisdom and love, negative and positive reunited. It’s a long way from here…

If we manage to evolve to the point where we ourselves are free of this negativity, then those negative aspects of ourselves will hold no power over us and our consciousness is then beyond the need for these lessons of negativity and their teachers to be seen as separate. There is further understanding and integration.

Who is that pure in third density? Nobody really, it’s just too difficult because of how everything works here. That’s why there are higher (smoother?) densities that allow for specifically those kinds of experiences to be learned and integrated.

Can’t there just be some evil, manipulative and stupid demon we can outsmart or kill so we can run off? I get that, but seeing it that way also suggests why we are here.

I don’t know if I believe all of this. But I think it’s a pretty good model.

Thank you for your comment Pol. As I have stated above, I do not think that this project embodies Ra of the Law of One in an appropriate sense, for Ra of the Law of One is not even an individual, but a sixth density social memory complex of beings, where positive and negative polarities have been harmonized.

While Ra immediately takes responsibility for his collective's past contact with Earth, there is no ego I can sense, and no deception. The Law of One is one of the best channeled works that speaks about the history of negative influence and manipulation of Earth by negatively polarized ETs and targeted elites, which is why I'm surprised that Courtney would disregard it. No negative being would actually reveal this and encourage such discernment as found in the Law of One.

Moreover, the Law of One is probably the LEAST controlling channeled material I have ever read. I have read "Seth Speaks" which I know Courtney also loves, yet Seth dictates an entire book for us. Meanwhile, the Ra of the Law of One only responds to specific questions, and even when pressed they refuse to speak about anything unless requested directed, because they are SO careful about respecting free will. In reality things are not so black-and-white, and things can be difficult to understand from our human perspective. We each need to discern for ourselves what resonates as truth for us.