Is this Ra the same Ra from the Law of One books? Guys, session 1 first book. Yes, it's the same. But it's not an individual. Ra appeared as many.
Imagine our group of relatively well-read people came down on a "primitive" group of humans, we'd be perceived as a collective. Those of us who would be seen as extra smart, would be chosen as important leader of sorts. We might not agree amongst ourselves on many levels and we're certainly quite different. We are kind of a unit though also. We are of almost the same level of awareness even. We wouldn't all speak the exact same wisdom and our attempts to teach would vary greatly. It would be a big mess to those folks we chose to visit. But we’d mean well, in our ignorance.
Ra did the same. They came to teach the Law of One. Meant well, but they themselves were still distorted. They noticed their mistake in appearing and being perceived as "other". So they removed themselves leaving a big mess. After they'd disappeared, their message was further distorted by the barbaric humans, so Ra fully admit their mistakes. They've been trying to make amends for this. If this still seems quite negative, then why bother helping humanity later through works such as Law of One?
Well, it's not as simple as this.
In addition to this, the model presented by Ra is essentially that of fracturing of consciousness. We are portions of them in their past. We are a multitude of little parts of their consciousness, so they must turn us into something greater, otherwise they themselves are not. God perceiving Self.
"[...] The one Being of the creation is like unto a body, if you will accept this third-density analogy.
Would we ignore a pain in the leg?
A bruise upon the skin?
A cut which is festering.
It's not "them" and "us". I know many people have a hard time grasping this because of programming and the individual nature of experience in third density. In this model, there is no separation. What happens when you remote view things? You're certainly not using your eyes. You're using the capacities of a higher aspect of yourself that transcends the rules of this world. Strange. Keep going, You're going to end up realizing that higher aspects of yourself are aware of, and also shaping all of this world (ESP and Manifestation are just the start) (see Co-creators).These aspects can appear to you as “other” if that's your current level of learning.
Basically, all detailed channeled material kind of paints this same picture.
The question remains: Why can't we then just be totally free and run naked over some meadows? I'd encompass this in this same model by saying that higher and quite negative aspects of ourselves have entrapped us and will attempt to recycle us. These aspects are negative seen from “below”, but they are still US. Seen eye to eye, they will not be negative. Which is what Ra have been saying. Sixth density = blending of wisdom and love, negative and positive reunited. It’s a long way from here…
If we manage to evolve to the point where we ourselves are free of this negativity, then those negative aspects of ourselves will hold no power over us and our consciousness is then beyond the need for these lessons of negativity and their teachers to be seen as separate. There is further understanding and integration.
Who is that pure in third density? Nobody really, it’s just too difficult because of how everything works here. That’s why there are higher (smoother?) densities that allow for specifically those kinds of experiences to be learned and integrated.
Can’t there just be some evil, manipulative and stupid demon we can outsmart or kill so we can run off? I get that, but seeing it that way also suggests why we are here.
I don’t know if I believe all of this. But I think it’s a pretty good model.