In regards to the new production:
1. Comments have been made that attempt to equate humans eating animals with what the Reptilians are seen to be doing. This seems false to me. The killing and consumption of animals is in no way comparable to the sadistic torture as seen by the remote viewers.
The behavior of the Reptilians goes beyond mere indifference and into realms that we humans consider perverse and morbid.
2. I interpret Princess' interaction and results differently than Dr. Brown. This "gatekeeper" was tasked to keep her from seeing things and in the end he succeeded. Princess was dazzled by BS (or something) and seemed to give in and in return got to see how much they know and how little we know.
Consider; the underlying logic in the gatekeepers argument seems to me to be that the torture of innocent humans in the pursuit of knowledge and power is okay and we will keep it secret in order to protect you.
Other opinions welcome.
Hi Robert,
Unfortunately I tend to agree with you. I maybe incorrect because of my negative "paranoia" and lack of trust for any biologicals interacting with humanity at this time, but I think a follow up session looking at this biological and "deep mind probing" it - to get a better understanding of who/why/what their mission/objective is would be really beneficial not just for everyone, but also Princess???
I totally understand what Courtney is saying as well about raising frequency, and leaving the same paradigms that cause my/our paranoia (distrust/fear/anger) behind us, in order for humanity to better itself. But when we have such a massive prison/predator species being our prison guards.. how can we not naturally be distrustful and NOT trust what this biological was communicating to Princess???
Maybe we can look at targets/biologicals again in future/follow up projects to ascertain more, by doing something like "brainstorms" to get questions to be tasked in future sessions to get try and get a set of data that covers more areas in regards to a subject - For example:
Primary Subject Target: Biological referred to as DoorKeeper
Target Cues: Who are they? / Where are they from? / What is the subjects primary mission? / From an human perspective would the subject be called as "Positive/Neutral/Negative" / Was the subject blocking Princess's session with negative intent, etc..
Maybe other RV methods such as ARV could be used as well?
I'm sure that Courtney/Farsight are far more switched on that I am, and probably know more of better ways to get more data.. Its just a thought/suggestion that occurred to me. I do commend Courtney and everyone at Farsight for all their work. I am seriously grateful that they really are going into areas where other groups probably wouldn't consider. Thank you for getting very important information for all of us / Humanity.
If you’ve seen various undercover videos of how animals are treated before they are killed and eaten the analogy makes more sense. Of course this is meaning all cow houses treat animals this way just like Courtney said not all reptilians are the same.
Yes I agree with you that NOT all species have the same intent, be it negative or positive. The same is true here on Earth as well, its not as easy as x or y. My concern is how do we discern who is telling us the truth?
For a more technological advanced civilisation its easier to deceive other species/civilisations that are maybe not on the same level. We can see that in Earth's own history or even in the financial world with big aggressive corporations using their tech to put smaller "mom and pop" stores out of business.
My personal stance is to try and gather all data possible on a subject/species/faction whatever before we take their statements at face value. Since looking at our history (Which Farsight have shown excellently) has clearly been manipulated by various ET factions.
I know the new age response is "To open your heart and you will feel the true intent/love from the species/faction/biological" - But from ET abductions accounts, screen memories and mental control is common by these biologicals and they can imprint whatever "love" or "light" to make you believe / trick you into their agenda. So using our "feelings" is not valid data. That's why Blind RV projects are good data collection techniques rather than "own intuition" which can lead to AOLs or Deductions...
Yes, the herding of animals and torturing of them is not right . Totally agree. But haven't the same ET forces throughout time through their control systems "taught" us we need to sacrifice animals or slaughter them in certain religious ways to make them suitable for consumption?
If the ET races are saying "Oh you slaughter animals, so we are only doing what you do" as an excuse for their actions, then that's pure BS . You only have to look at most of the Orion based religions having some kind of "feast" to the gods with Animal / Human sacrifice was required or religious requirements to consume meat "Kosher/Halal/etc"
This goes back to my original comment:
How do we know who are we dealing with is "benevolent" ?
OK so Courtney DOES have an overview on the Galactic Federation of World's motives, etc.. He wrote about them I think in his Cosmic Voyages books in the 90s.. so since then he has probably gained a lot of info on them. But for the rest of us, how do we know during our meditations that we have contacted the right people? - and not some more imposters pretending to be something else?
An example of this, was the "Urantia Book". Another remote viewer, Brett Stuart/Technical Intuition done a RV project on the book, and he saw the channelling coming from a Insectoid/Mantis type group sending these concepts for their own agenda.
I'm using the above example to show its very difficult for us here to ascertain "who is telling the truth" - Even according to rumours the US Government couldn't differentiate "friend or foe" when signing the "Treaty of Greada 1954" with the Grey type species??
Just my two cents worth. I totally get and agree with what Courtney is saying.. its just after millennia of manipulation who does one trust??
Very good points. It is very difficult to discern who to trust. IMO the trustful sources are ones that only encourage and not demand people do things. I’ve heard from another channeler the idea of type 1 and type 2 beings
One type respects free will above everything else and would never interfere. They are overwhelmingly benevolent.
The other type doesn’t respect free will and can be like some of these reptilians torturing people. But they can also be benevolent ones who are messing around with our chosen experience on earth.
I personally don’t believe anyone who has gotten far enough to find farsight is some poor soul trapped in an endless reincarnation cycle. More likely we came here for a one and done to see what’s up with that prison planet. Nobody here is going to the light. We’ll simply go back home to wtv planet we were on before.
Z, all good points and appreciated. I too value and follow Farsight's work because of it's uniqueness.
In my mind, I imagined the reptilians high fiveing each other and congratulating doorkeeper on not only completing the mission but using his creativity in his successful appeal to Princess' emotional side.
From Aziz and Kahmia's sessions we can see the reptilians not just experimenting on humans, but using fear, electroshock, isolation, disorientation and other techniques to degrade the human soul and for their own enjoyment.
Reminds me of the methods used by some in the CIA for interrogation and brainwashing re; MKUltra. Maybe some of the CIA spooks and their sick psychologists have been trained in the Reptilian school of torture?
Some sources say that these negative ET's feed off of emotions. Is that why their life forces were close to being drained while they were being tortured? In one part of the sessions they were obviously getting a thrill out of the thought of it.
As bad as the meat industry (and scientific experimentation) is, it is safe to say it is nowhere near as bad as what is being depicted in these sessions. We are all familiar with the extensive forced abduction and experimentation on humans depicted in the UFO phenomenon. On some level it would be understandable if they were experimenting in order to, say, try to save their dying species. Ritualistic torture and the lust for power is different of course. Were animals to be tied up and tortured for laughs - or strange pleasure rituals - in any scientific experiment or at any food corporation it certainly wouldn't last long...one would hope!
Just a few not fully formed thoughts niggling in the back of my mind. On the one hand I am learning that we are timeless beings who can free ourselves from the endless cycle of 'biological death, amnesia and rebirth' and on the other that our state of repeating cyclical biological existences on a prison planet is about to become crystallized forever, if we do not find a way to prevent it. Without fighting back we will endlessly reanimate biological mass to fulfill the needs of another species. Remote viewing forays into the reptilian consciouness and material installations is observed by them and showing them that we cannot be merely considered as beings of a lesser sentience. Cows do not appear in our consciousness and explore our minds and our motives (do they?).
The weird business of torture reminds me of statements to the effect that our hormonal secretions when in a state of great pain and terror are especially enjoyed by these beings. The sources for these observations are from those who also claim that pre-adolescent humans are tortured and consumed for similar reasons. The Zeus project also rang this bell for me. The secretions are alledgedly greatly prized by reptilians. This information comes from people like David Icke and others who do not reveal any evidence or sources for their assertions. Sometimes 'channelling' and 'downloads' are referred to. But the suggestion gives at least a starting hypothesis. It may not be secretions so much as the enegetics of terror that they can use. But those tubes are suggestive of actual biomass.
Do Reptilians feel compassion for members of their own species? Just as human bullies blank out the guilt, usually by cancelling out the last horror by doing something worse, are there reptilians who understand a path that leads to obsesssive excess and total moral breakdown? Courtney in his appeal to the GFW makes reference to the interference of Reptilians in moral terms. This project does root itself in some sense of what is and what is not ethical. Does our sense of right and wrong hold resonance amongst other species?
A final observation - I remember Princess telling a reptilian, in one session, what beautiful eyes he had. This entity while hostile to the other viewers responded with great charm to Princess. Perhaps her being resonates with theirs outside of normal human perceptions of what is unpleasant and she can meet them as spiritual beings without prejudice - hence their desire to hide their material actions against her species. In the face of Princess perhaps they feel shame on some level. They may be here to control but they may also face inner conflicts about their methods and their cruelty. Just as human ruling groups are often challenged from within by those who doubt the rightness of their actions and those who abhor the lust for sadism.
Actually, yes I think animals do find their way into our consciousnesses, in the dream world particularly, but also in some cases psychically. However, the explorations are not quite the same and occur more "naturally". It is interaction rather than premeditated exploration, however I suppose that could also be the case sometimes in a manner of speaking.
I've had animals come to me in dreams and then the following day have a run in with that particular kind of animal. An example: I saw two frogs in a dream interacting with me and then the very next evening I saw two frogs on a deck curiously walk up (rather than run away) and then one of them tried to jump into the partly open sliding glass door to happily go exploring before I closed it.
One time I saw a panther in a dream that spoke to me, which was quite surprising. I tend to think that some advanced animals could perhaps carry on a basic conversation if they had the physical apparatus and experience to use it. But that's getting carried away a bit I suppose.
Yes, I tend to think that all beings and all species, whether reptilian or salamander-esque, should have the basic capacity to experience beauty or discern right from wrong, unless they are a robot. However I could be wrong. Psychopaths tend to lack empathy and in some cases ethical judgment. It brings up the question: is this a physical or more of a spiritual limitation?
Are aliens like the reptilians, who seem to be far away from their home planet, outcasts, renegades thrown out by their own people because they could not get along well with others and that's the only reason we see them interacting in our world causing disruptions?
