Interesting to hear Rock referring to UAPs in the May Human news as opposed to non-surface structures or UFOs. Some commentators see this shift in terminology by the authorities as part of a wider strategy to gain control of the discourse. They will talk about it but on their terms and with their terminology. They have put so much effort in denying that UFOs exist at all that they are talking about UAP's, thus they can sidestep critcism of their earlier derision of those who talked about UFOs with a trick of the tongue. To be fair the term 'flying' itself is only applicable insofar as the non-surface structures I am interested in move through the atmosphere where only birds, bats, man made aerial vehicles, and natural phenomena not under intelligent control are supposed to be.
I had a dream of seeing an object with remarkable flying powers dropping from a great height in a straight line while flipping in precise 90 degree movements coming to a hovering stop inches above the ground. As I thought about it afterwards it occurred to me that the incredible movements of the UFOs popping in and out of vision and making perfect right angle turns while moving at phenomenal speed is not like flight at all but more like a geometric translation through time and space. The objects are not 'flying' through the atmosphere then but changing co-ordinates in time and space. It is like an act of relocation by many tiny amounts that together look like movement through the air as we know flying to be and then at will making big positional changes by single large relocations. There is no need for anti-gravity because there is in one sense no actual movement. Greer may have it all wrong about alternative energy being used to achieve anti-gravity. There may be no anti-gravity device in use at all. These objects may have more to do with relocating using consciousness than by using advanced energy systems. Or perhaps there are many ways of solving propulsion challenges and some of them perhaps do use anti-gravity systems. I wonder if I will live to learn about this in this body's lifetime.
I have seen about 50 UFO's now of various kinds. I am sorry I am asking you to take my word on this but it is the thing that has led me here via Ingo Swan et al. I am very interested in the promised release of material. I understand there are caveats that will allow the agencies involved to withhold anything that they consider too dangerous to disclose. So what is released will tell us more about what they want us to believe than about what they know or what they think is really going on. But I must try to continue with an alert mind and expect to be reading between the lines once again. And I will continue to refer to the objects I see as UFOs and fully accept the sense of Remote Viewers referring to non-surface structures.