Is is reading books such as

Alien interview
Walking among us
Tony Rodriguez

And assigning them as targets to RV?

Or is it already an interesting target that was RVed then the books confirm the RV data?

Or is it a book is discovered… then some of it is read and then it is put down to RV the claims then the rest of the book is read to confirm?

I imagine that when we're talking about double-blind studies or data that can be more reliable because it's uncorrupted by pre-set bias, you need to encourage the Remote Viewers to really not read anything at all as a contribution to the targets. Or at least to treat that as something to do on their own time and not assume it'll be related.

After all the sessions are done and data gathered, sure you could reveal the target and use books and materials to corroborate the idea. But that's for the "audience viewers," the actual recipients of the data.

I'm sure a lot of the targets Courtney places are all based on books he's formerly read or browsed and feels it's an ideal target. Some of it sounds like he had never planned to go in that direction at all, but the RV data seemed to consistently point that other direction anyhow.

For example I saw one of Courtney's old videos where he was talking about 9/11. And he at first didn't think that 9/11 was a scam and that these conspiracy theorists are going nutty. But he believed strongly enough that RV would help find the answer and after gathering the data it all seemed to confirm what the conspiracy theories suggest (at least the slightly nutty sounding ones. Not always the incredibly nutty sounding ones).

Anyways, I probably didn't answer your question at all. But I guess: For the person making the targets, sure the books can precede the sessions. For the people doing the RV, the moderator should avoid all mention what this is about and NOT let the books precede the session at all.

Interesting question Natalie.

Aziz might mention something on this subject in one of the upcoming Projects. I see that sometimes when we have questions about topics, or the way Remote Viewing is done, they are answered out in the open on video like in the Forecast Round-ups or Introductions. He does read the forum (he has mentioned this lately).

I don't know the answer to your question, but if the entirety of each Farsight Project or Forecast, are conducted under the Institutes strict scientific methodology and protocols, then I am assuming that regardless of whether the Viewer has come into contact with the information or read a book previously, it should not influence the RV outcome as the Target itself is unknown.

Yet, here I see an issue - the physics. A transference of unconscious data influencing the session down the chain. If the person who has read the book is the same person co-ordinating the study, designating the Target, the Question, timetabling the sessions, examining the data, scrutinizing the outcomes, and making the conclusions - then that where I see possible bias in the sessions data, and a form of transference from the start of a Project over to the Remote Viewer and returned in a form, to the end results.
Then there's other variants to consider. Does the Remote Viewer have any knowledge of the book or its contents, read the book, know the author? What does and how does that effect or influence the data?

In the next Mysteries Project (which I'm looking forward to) Farsight has suggested the reading of a book by Tony Rodrigues. "Ceres Colony Cavalier" - a biographical account of his 20 years spent in abduction by aliens, and his account of his recalled experiences.
The book was released 31st December, 2021 - so the book is not that old - but parts of story has been told previously.
I'm not sure how this Project was approached by Farsight or what information will be delivered to us when its released. I'm sure FS has a library worth of data that could co-relate and align with aspects of what Tony Rodrigues tells of his experiences. But I hope that's not just what this Project is about, the verification aspect. I hope it can expand into information which is known or hidden and yet not 'verified'.

And I see what Michael is saying (in his reply to the header post) in the sense that there is a connective link to a few things. The transference of unconscious subconscious information between the book, the author, and a connected interest by people looking at the information. In a sense, I don't think you can eliminate those connections - the Farsight team inclusively, Dr Salla, Elena Danaan, Tony Rodrigues. Then again, I have no idea what the upcoming Project's purpose and intention is, or what it will reveal. Does their connections to each other and the information and knowledge they have bring something to the table collectively regarding/influencing the type and quality of the data? What if connections like that enhance the outcomes - that's a possibility too, but it gets a bit entangled (my line of thinking) if a Project is only there to prove that Remote Viewing works or can be verified. To me that's not exactly the point.

But anyways, nice question Natalie!

For the record tho I think Tony Rodriguez is 100% legit. Since the briefing I’ve watched a couple dozen hours of his interviews (also thank you farsight for also allowing 2xs speed on the videos so we can get more info faster)

This YouTube channel has an excellent series of interviews with Tony and is a great interviewer who doesn’t interrupt. (Some of the earlier videos in the series have internet connection problems but it’s just the first couple videos where that happens

For those that prefer to hear from the man himself speaking with body language as opposed to reading a book

I agree, Michael, that although I try to be optimistic, I don't want to deny something sad.

If we are not truly *hard* in our upcoming efforts, the enemy wins - certainly for a long time. And an atrocious win of galactic proportions.

The fact that they are ruling by covert semi-contracted coercion and hidden crime is proof that we did win on the front of overt dictatorship. I feel that the nature of the war on earth is basically like this phrase I heard recently-

It's up to the willing 2 percent to wake up the misguided 10 percent, to overpower the ruling 1 percent.