Hi everybody,
Looking for guideline for creating targeting cues. Haven't seen anything on the site about that. Anybody knows a good book or other sources about it?
Thank you
Del
Thank you :)
I deeply appreciate that you answer me personally. Very unexpected.
Btw I wish to congratulate you for the course. It's crystal clear, and with sufficient details.
Also loved your book "remote viewing, the science and theory of nonphysical perceptions". It really enlighten me about the process and it's limitations.
Returning to the question. Guess I need to be more precise. Is there a "preferred way" or syntax to write the task? Like some adding adjectives, constrains ect. that would enhance targeting clarity. Ok you may say to add whatever I want to describe what is to see, but it's not what I mean. I'm looking for the optimal order of elements, "trigger words" in the cue to express it to the subspace mind.
I see in Prometheus protocols that you use the following syntax: target/time. Is there a reason to put it in this order? May seems trivial, maybe not.
Is the intent of the tasker as important as what he writes? You've opened quite a door with telepathic connection in between viewer and analyst, so why not with the tasker/subspace mind? Basically we don't know precisely how the subspace mind access the cue (please correct me if I'm wrong).
From your colleague Daz Smith, I see that he's using as examples: "optimum time and position", "only', as constrains in cues. Are those really making a difference? Those represents the kind of examples that ring a bell to me.
Maybe there is no specific rules or "best practices" and I'm looking for the black bug, and that only clarity is important. Still wanted to know if someone explored this avenue in depth. Hope I've been able to give you a clear picture of what I'm trying to investigate.
Thank you very much for your time and wishing you a good one :)
Del
Del
YVONJR FOREST
Jeremy Hunter
There is a lot of confusion in the world about targeting. Just remember one thing. The target is not what is written on any piece of paper. What is written on paper is meaningless unless it helps constrain the thoughts of the closer. The target is created by the THOUGHTS of the person who is first comparing the remote-viewing data with the target definition (the so-called "closing". So any extraneous thoughts during that time can legitimately become part of the target.
Del
YVONJR FOREST
Thank you for the precisions and your time.
There is so much different opinions in the RV world that it's easy to get off tracks.
So the target cue must be written to be logical for sure, and meaningful to the first person who reviews. Sounds like a basic recipe. I'll check in NLP is there is something that could help with that, never know.
Wishing you a good one :)
Del
YVONJR FOREST