I have read the book Alien Interview and studied Scientology and I would like to point out that there is a very close one-to-one relationship between the knowledge passed on by the alien officer of the Domain Expeditionary Force and the teachings of Scientology.

Courtney Brown finds the teachings of the alien from the roswell UFO crash to be close in line with the findings of various Farsight mysteries. Consequently these findings also closely match the teachings of Scientology, as described by L. Ron Hubbard in his various books and lectures.

For this reason, it would seem natural and pertinent to do a project on Scientology and Hubbard, to find out what the connection is. The conclusion I personally draw, is that Hubbard was actually himself a member of the Domain Expeditionary Force, which would make a good target.

Hubbard claims to have created a spiritual technology, that helps man free himself from the prison of Earth, by regaining his memory and abilities lost due to the amnesia death traps. The so-called Wall of Fire is a vital point in this endavour and would be another good target.

"Alien Interview" is clearly a hoax. But that doesn't necessarily mean that all of the "information" it contains is rubbish. There might be nuggets of truth in it. I've read it too and found it amusing rather than revealing. Consequently, I'm wondering if "The Domain" really exists in the first place. Moreover, I find it slightly worrying that Farsight is borrowing the terminology from this fictional book. "Domain", "Old Empire", etc. How does Farsight's own body of work corroborate these entities to begin with? But maybe I'm missing something.

Yes. Hoax. From a previous thread.
_____________________________________________________

This what Bill Ryan from Project Avalon to say about Alien Interview

‘ALIEN INTERVIEW’ by Lawrence Spencer



Unfortunately, this book is a hoax. This is definitive.

Lawrence Spencer is careful (presumably for legal reasons) to offer the written disclaimer that 'Alien Interview'. should be regarded as a work of fiction, but it does the UFO community (and the Scientology community - see below) no favors when Spencer maintained on subsequent radio talk shows, some with sizable audiences, that the purported "interview" really happened. It did not.

Conveniently, the claimed source, "Matilda MacElroy" is "deceased" - and Spencer "destroyed all the original documentation". So we'll just have to take his word for it... and his word, publicly stated, is that he is portraying real events. Sadly, his word is not very honorable, and he is lying. I don't often deploy that unpleasant word, but here its use is accurate and fair.

Any Scientologist with any experience will instantly recognize the very large number of terms and concepts directly borrowed from (and sourced by) L. Ron Hubbard.

These are literally too numerous to list, starting right at the start with "doll bodies", "what's true is what's true for you", "If you were looking for Hell, the Earth would suffice", liberal use of the term "Space Opera", the concept that the Earth is a prison planet, and much, much, much else. Find any friendly Scientologist and they will be pleased and intrigued to go through the book line by line with you. There's a smoking gun on almost every page.

Spencer has maybe made an unfortunate judgment, and written an interesting work of fiction (and don't get me wrong here: many of the metaphysical concepts, formulated by Hubbard, may be valuable and have a great deal of truth to them) - but has then fallen into the trap of using his idea of journalistic license to portray the concepts in the framework of a "true story".

This does not help genuine UFO research one iota, and further confuses the complex Roswell issue - in which real, elderly witnesses, with great courage at the end of their lives, have come forward to tell their very real stories. Spencer discredits and dishonors these fine people by what he has done. This is my issue.

Almost as an afternote: there are many other problems with the book - many of which are already cited by other reviewers. Use of the terms "carbon dating", "computer", "database", "alien" (the Roswell survivor was called an EBE, or Extraterrestrial Biological Entity), MacElroy being a "Senior Master Sergeant" - and more - are all anachronisms: the words or terms did not exist in 1947, and show clearly that this is recent writing. The date stamp is also wrong: the author uses the English notation of 9.7.1947 for 9 July 1947... a little slip, written by Spencer, who although American is very familiar with England.

Lastly, consider what the alien's name ('AIRL') is an anagram of.

The final nail in the coffin is this e-mail, written by Spencer himself in 2000:

**********

From: Lawrence Spencer
Sent: 07 November 2000 02:12
To: Graham Hancock
Subject: Your victory

Dear Graham,

Congratulations to you and Robert on your victory regarding the BBC 
attack! Well Done! I commend you on your courage and persistence.

I am the author of "The Oz Factors" (I sent both yourself and Robert a 
copy of my book last spring), so I certainly do have some first hand 
knowledge how the mainstream academic vested interests operate to 
suppress the truth. My book discusses this subject as one of the 12 
"Oz Factors" which prevent our civilization from discovering answers 
to the mysteries of our existence.

I have been a Scientologist for 31 years. A good deal of my book is an 
application of the principles of L. Ron Hubbard as regards the fields 
of study into which you and Robert have so bravely advanced. Perhaps 
the material in my book will be of assistance to you at some point in 
your research.

Keep up the good fight!

Very Best Regards,
Lawrence R. Spencer
author of "The Oz Factors"

**********

Read this book as the metaphysically fascinating work of fiction that it is. Spencer's post-publication behavior, however, elevates this "fiction" to the level of a dishonorable hoax, for which he should be ashamed. He could have handled this much, much better.

I'm a UFO researcher myself. If you want the truth, there are many other places to find it. And if Spencer wants to contact me, he can through Project Avalon or Project Camelot ([email protected]).

I'd be interested to know privately what possessed him to go so far and to paint himself into such a corner, from which escape is now almost impossible without him continuing to deceive his readers.

Bill Ryan
PROJECT AVALON
PROJECT CAMELOT

This information has been collected from several books such as the Bible The URANTIA BOOK several Knostic scriptures and more. From the beginning there was only one Primal Creator that made seven fee Male spirits. They "cooperatively" created one-thousand Michael's with seven fee-Male spirits each. The 8008 spirits then manifested on the 3-D plane a double planetary system named Zeta Renticulum with Gold/Silver being that destroyed both worlds in civil wars. Now the Grey/Greens at the DUMB near Dulce New Mexico doing the Cattle Mutilations. Next manifested was the Reptilian and Insectoid races on different planets. All three have telepathic abilities. At this point in time the 0ne-thousand Michael's and mates incarnated upon the moving system Nemesis/Nibiru by orders from the Prime Creator to spread the Human Genome upon many planets. This was to allow created spirits to be "re-incarnated" through different bodies until eventually reaching the Human stage, then hearing of a coming day of judgement. Upon this day only the created Male stand in self-judgement and not the accompanying seven fee Males. If found worthy then all eight receive Eternal Life and a planet to begin to raise-up their own baby spirits through this "re-incarnation process" until they reach their day of judgement when the same thing happens and only the best move-up! In this way the Prime Creators are "replicating" themselves in time.

You guys are going off on a tangent whether Alien Interview is a hoax or not, but you are missing the main point.

All I'm saying is that Scientology would make a very interesting target since it's teachings line up with the knowledge gained at Farsight regarding things like the Death Traps and the running of Earth as a prison planet.

If you place any credence in the validity of Farsight projects and the Farsight method of obtaining information across space and time, you must do the same with the information in Alien interview and Scientology. If you don't, I don't know what you're doing here. You cannot simply dismiss Alien Interview as a hoax, no matter who you're sourcing, if you at the same time has confidence in the validity of information obtained at Farsight.

Fair argument! But it's still a fictional story, so is "Alice in Wonderland". The difference is that the latter was never promoted as factual. The similarity is that both contain "nuggets of truth", which may be uncovered using RV methods. That is a fact as far as I'm concerned.

"has confidence in the validity of information obtained at Farsight."

Time to review the Farsight disclaimer, "entertainment and educational purposes only".

To believe Farsight RVing, and well, anyone's RVing, as gospel truth/fact is foolish.

RVing can be correct. This has been proven. And too, the opposite.

Just the other day, Dick and Daz were discussing telepathic corruption of RV on a target - the tasker influencing the taskee. It can happen.

Considering Courtenay is a big fan of these books and stories and then goes and targets them ... one can reasonably wonder if there is corruption with the RVing of the subjects so dear to his heart.

Yeah, that's a good point.

I have often wondered what the RV'er is actually sensing. Maybe he's not seeing reality across time and space but telepathically reading the unconscious mind and experiencing the subjective universe of the tasker.

If that is true, the only time he will get a target right, objectively speaking, is when the tasker himself (or tasker's subconscious) has a correct target (target in reality and target in tasker's subconscious are the same).

In this case the RV target I have suggested probably wouldn't result in a project that made any sense, because the close correlation between Alien Interview and Scientology that I see doesn't exist in the mind of the tasker (Courtney Brown).

I'm not educated in SRV to any significant degree. But I do suggest that if the process is organised in a properly scientific way (doubly blind f.i.) and if some elements of the target can be verified, it would be fair to lend credence to the data. The problem with these ET targets is, that there are no verifiable elements. And yes, I'm aware of Farsight's disclaimer. Interpreting the data is another ballgame. May I suggest that this is where much might go astray and probably will. One is always tempted to make the data fit preconceptions. So, are the data supporting the "Alien Interview" information, or is "Alien Interview" the preconception in which SRV data are fitted? Just asking the question. I don't as yet have na opinion.

Here is a link to the Alien Interview audiobook. You can listen for free with the Audible app: Listen to Alien Interview by Lawrence R. Spencer on Audible. https://www.audible.co.uk/pd/B07B6C5MTQ?source_code=ASSOR150021921000R

Farsight does a project on the Galactic Federation.

Shortly after, Elena Danna writes a book on the Galactic Federation that supports Farsight.

Farsight then targets the book and the results support the book and thus concludes what Farsight did originally was correct.

Is this what is called a LOOP?

It is all wheels within wheels. Hopefully we are all interested in 'texts' as objects of human creation and not manifestations of truth. The work of Farsight and and the works of our imagination and the works of what we call science and history and so on are all open to contextualisation and deconstruction. I cope by allowing the development of these sets of ideas and systems of thought to live in me as perspectives. I hope to tend toward a better understanding of being without any hope of landing truth in the form of a text. I 'be' whether I like it or not . It never fails to be interesting. The seemingly unnecessary and endless suffering of beings motivates me to want answers and solutions.

The 'Interview' book shocked me because of its, in my perception, intensely reactionary ideological stance. The weasel way in which it presented a special form of divine revelation to impose the steady state universe and intelligent design of all life in the universe was greasy in the extreme. Human science may have got it all wrong but at least it strives to show its working out and proposes evidence that you can accept or contest; not offering third hand cant from a being that only communicates with one human.

And yet I found resonance with the idea of an 'IS-BE'. Strange. I did notice in another forum someone raising a question, that I have also given voice to, about the idea that self-realised IS-BEs can also end up enslaved in an artificial body and doomed to spend millennia in the service of the Domain. It seems that escaping the Death Traps may free you from the prison planet of amnesia only to land you fully aware in the prison universe.

The forums here are full of references to every kind of old and new spiritual, occultist and mystical systems. This is partly because there are few places where such open ended discussion of mysteries can take place without ridicule but maybe partly inspired by attempts to mislead and dilute the true purpose of this site - to get people doing RV themselves.

With FarSight and other resources available, it has become a circus of actors, clowns and a few animals still. The level of understanding is obviously not the same in different incarnates. To hear negative reactions is something that one becomes used to everyday. Information can be present but the ear must be ready to assimilate it first. My thanks to everyone here at FarSight today.