After the recent intelligence briefing, I felt compelled to address unanswered questions. Courtney spoke about Americans all across the country in diners that believe the election is stolen. Courtney obviously has a different opinion. Dick Algire has alluded to it being stolen. Famed psychic spy URI Geller also believes it was stolen. URi was recently interviewed by Linda Howe of earth files discussing ufos. Uri was stuffied by Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff and if you know anything about remote viewing, you know they were there in the beginning. So the only way we would really have any truth would be to do a project on the 2020 election. I don’t have an opinion one way or another but Courtney implies that it’s unreasonable for people not to accept the results. After seeing the projects the farsight team has put out over the years including the 911 inside job, is it really hard to believe if the trade center could come down an election couldn’t be stolen? Why differing opinions among different remote viewing groups (farsight, crypto viewing, right hemispheric)? I thought the point of going to farsight prime was to go to the “fringe”, but when it comes to American politics. It’s as if it’s off limits. We are told “all presidents are interfered with and manipulated”, but shouldn’t that be verified with data?
There’s also the hypocrisy of referencing Elena Danaan. But, now she states the death traps have been removed and reptilians have been kicked out. Courtney states that’s not true but he told us who she was. Just a little confusing. He’s also had interviews with and referenced Michael Salla. Alex collier was on his channel and they were discussing how the Russians may save the world and take out the “Nazis” in Ukraine. Yes they believe that Nazis are in Ukraine. Michael Salla also believes the qanon theories. Alex collier seemed at times he was guessing rather than backing his statements up by real experiments.
So what’s the point of all of this? Well, I think we need to let the data speak for itself and let the people who pay for the content decide what they want. It seems that alll across the board in the remote viewing community, the spiritual community, the abductee community, etc., there are differing opinions. Maybe the answer is within. One other tidbit, I will add. I’ve never seen any remote viewing 100% accurate. And, the further you go into the future the more inaccurate they tend to be due to the variety of timelines. So the idea of martial law in 2025, I would take with a grain of salt at this time.

Yes the election was STOLEN! In 1973 the first system of machines was employed to count the Votes. Since then all levels of elections have been done this way. The Die-Bold machines were proven to be in error. There was a documentary film done that appeared on HBO over twenty years ago detailing this case. Electronic systems such as home laptops connected through Wi-Fi signals to the cable company now have allowed hackers to seize home systems making it necessary for computer protection! This technique of electronic "stuffing of ballots" is a very old trick now days.

The point of the thread isn’t for us discuss whether or not we believe the election was stolen. Without data, then divisiveness will continue. There’s a split even in the remote viewing community. That’s why a project would help end the narrative once and for all. It’s not just the election, the same is for vaccinations and other topics as well. But, once again we stay away from those sensitive areas. Many people in the remote viewing community including Edward Riordan alluded how the vaccine could be connected and/or controlled with a Wi-Fi like system. That was based off one of his sessions. Now others have a different view. Some people, well educated even believe it’s the merger of AI with humans and we will be cut off from the soul once and for all. Once again, wouldn’t a project help end the discussion?