Hi everyone, and especially @Courtney and team!

I just watched an interesting interview on New Thinking Allowed, where Jeffrey Mishlove talks to Paul H. Smith. He mentions some LIMITATIONS in remote viewing, which he calls telepathic overlay.

This occurs when the target for a remote viewing session does not actually exist. What can then happen is, the remote viewer instead picks up on the PRECONCEPTIONS of either the one giving the target or the most senior and influential remote viewer of the team.

This caught my attention. How do you ensure something like this does not happen on your projects here on Farsight? Is it something that cannot happen if you formulate the target with enough open endedness?

Thanks, it would be interesting to hear someone on the Farsight team address this question!

Keep up the good work!

It's similar to the difference between looking at a cardboard cutout of a person and the person itself. If your senses are dulled enough you might initially mistake it for a real thing, however if you're sharp you won't. It also helps if you're getting a strong, prolonged connection to the target to be able to tell in the first place.

You can't make (to my knowledge) sufficiently advanced thoughtforms to replace ISBEs, hence why the whole mass slavery thing is needed.

Some of these beings you'll remote view will try to throw you off track with their version of telepathic overlay, trying to obfuscate their shapes or create attractors to throw you off their trail. When that doesn't work they just go for straight intimidation if they can "get ahold of you". I've found it's easier to get around them trying to get ahold of you with years of work with high vibration crystals.

I'd love to hear the team's take on all of this as well.

Amen. Exactly what I’ve been alluding to in many forums. Then the forums magically disappear for friendly criticism on the targeting of some not all projects. It’s very clear that the moderator will delete your post if it doesn’t match what farsight wants. Which ironically is like the “oppressive” ETs act. Telepathic overlay is real, it was studied extensively during the star gate years. There’s no way to guarantee it doesn’t happen when your doing targets that you can’t get feedback on. For example, if I tasked a good viewer with the tooth fairy, they would get data and describe the tooth fairy even know it’s make believe. This has been proven. Tasking is just as important as the viewers to a great project.

Well, yes and no. One of the key aspects of RV is the ability and need to target a concept and explore what it is. For example, if a given target is something like "gaslighting", which is not something tangible, can potentially mean: 1. manipulating (someone) by psychological means into doubting their own sanity, or 2. The act of lighting butane/propane gas.

Neither are an object, thing or place. But still a legit target, because it is an idea that EXISTS, albeit a popular idea nowadays in the mainstream, as with meaning one, which may not always be the case, so the idea itself can be explored in the data matrix in the fashion that the viewer's subconscious mind can best interpret the idea.

For example, with the Tooth Fairy one, the viewer might describe the motion of a fairy looking entity taking a tooth under a pillow at night. This does not mean the data is false, or overlaying someone else's interpretation, but it is describing the general idea of what the consensus may imagine the idea to involve. The viewer then is able to discern the metaphor from the literal.

Like someone else also pointed out, if the viewer is sufficiently sharp enough in their ability, they're able to distinguish real from imitation.