Lot's of questions remain unanswered. In some ways Aziz' representation reminded me of the description how are own planet is controlled by bad ET's, with some slavery going on, and with a possible insurgent element (military) that plays nice to the Reptillians but actually wants to get rid of them. Some parallels there.
Ok so back to our situation on earth, can someone explain to me why it is not possible for the good ETs to directly lay contact with military leaders and tell them how crucial it is to not comply with any agreements with the bad entities.
I totally understand the concept of Free Will and Free Choice, and that the Good Guys cannot interfere in actual decisions here.
But wouldn't it be at least normal and acceptible to just neutraly lay out all the options and scenarios to the military when they make decision A, B or C. Like: hey guys, we are the good guys, this is what we know, this is what we can do and how we can help, this is how the bad guys operate and manipulate you, now it's totally up to you with who of the 2 sides you are going to deal with. Same as Harvey is informing the FS crew.
That is not regarded as intervening in free choice right? If that information transition is allowed, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to directly talk to the military and give them their side of the story. And if direct contact is not possible, why not they write them an extensive letter or email with all the proof they can give to convince them. I just think there is ways to inform or convince the military to do the right thing, and push them towards disclosure.