New target: 21217808

Ok I decided to do one more. Again, planned reveal date is by Feb 1 2023. Can email submissions to [email protected]

Just a thought, but do you think leaving out the dash (-) in a target number makes a difference?
Not so much for the Target numbers above, but for other viewings where the number is for example 0000-0000?

Good question. Who knows it could have an impact. I could certainly put a dash just for consistency.

I generate the numbers on random.org

Full Spectrum - could you just clarify something for me - was this part of the Harvey sessions?
I saw in the Reveal Pages where you said:
'So I have now in total made 3 targets with the exact same description.'

or is this a totally different target - or should I just do it regardless.
Im a bit thick today LOL

No, that's also a good question.

The first Harvey session was posted a while back. I'll list the target number here. This one is definitely not part of that cluster.

So the targets were:

4864-1048
1938-8969
5364-8718

All with the same description-

"The viewer will connect with ""Harvey"" as described by Courtney Brown at Farsight 2022"

At this point I will leave that pursuit alone, at least for some time. And likely with no interest in repeating the exact same wording.

Hi Tazz,
I have sent you the new submission for the Target 21217808

Thanks so much!

Received! Thanks. Again, I'm happy to reveal a lot quicker than the planned date. Let me know if you'd like sooner, or at least I'll wait out a few days

I'm thinking to reveal this one in about a day or two. Anyone let me know asap if you want me to hold off for now.

When ever you're ready Full Spectrum - I will though send you the pictures today - not many, and very simple diagrams.

Ok I'm gonna reveal the target. I'm gonna start by introducing what I hope is a better system. I'm posting a link to a spreadsheet that is an exact duplicate of the spreadsheet where I keep all my targets, except the cells where I haven't yet revealed the target, I just leave blank. So you can always see the update and follow the history by clicking here.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-8mA1gKWXGT4VgA6nNqV5vMwzXh_2MiAmD6KrvtW9U0/edit?usp=drivesdk

Otherwise I'll still keep posting in the forum all the new ones and the reveals.

Del: it seems to me that this one was a direct hit.

For those that are directly involved in these exercises, things like this should prove to you once and for all that this ability is real. I made absolutely zero mention to Del what this target was supposed to be. So when Del sent me the results, the hairs on my neck stood on end. Great score.

Del's submission for Target 21217808

DATE OF SESSION: 20TH January 2023
TIME START: 12.36am
TIME END: 1:30AM

First Visual –
‘Y’ shape
I’m in a very dark area of space –
Seeing Thin streak lines against a black background
Golden coloured thin streaks of light
Speed – things moving very fast –
Feel a softness – a fleshiness
I can see a large revolving object.
-solid – grey rough natural surface
Long in length – Oumuamua type (deduction) space object
Tumbling turning slowly
Something in a void of space

Lines emanating from a shape
Connection – Disconnection
Death

Tumbling around
I sense heat – a heating up – rapid heat approaching
Temperature rise

Shape
Circular shape with a small black round centre
Very fast moving object
Kaleidoscope pattern
Moving shape – solid
Deduction – telescope (James Webb?)
A far flung object

Second Visual
Black Dark Objects
One is Triangular in shape
A square with a triangle cut out of it.
Black shapes
Repeating Patterns of fine lines criss crossing in a line

I see 2 black flaps opening – non surface structure craft – black steel
Outside is space
A Manoeuvre
Really getting Space object
Manmade craft

At this time I stand up to walk around to see what atmosphere environment I am in.
I am in a black coloured large space –
I am not on ground – no base surface but I’m not floating – I feel stable.
The air around is like warping or buckling – it is clear – see through – undulating – waving – warping
Clear liquid-type waves

I feel a presence watching me or saw me –
I get a flash image of a reptilian type being but I cannot see them in solid form – I can only see the upper half of the being – and then it is gone
Feeling trepidation – I keep looking – turning.
Definitely feels like I am an observer.
Cannot feel anything below me – as in ground – not grounded.
Fixated

This is not my picture – it is from Vashta Narda’s Galactic Art –
This was the closest thing to what I saw.

I see a panel of Dots and dashes – code.

I once more see the atmosphere warping.
Waves
Time & space

I draw another Ideogram -
I can see black shapes with zigzag edges lines
Radio waves
I can sense line rotating – rotating spirals.

I see a structure – I am in the structure
Aerospace – government - deduction
It has a cold block interior –
Grey flecked natural material – smooth and reflective / shiny.
The floor is polished – grey, white, streaky, formal.
I can hear a male voice ‘nothing out there’.
I see a black and white picture in a frame - Nikola Tesla
Complicated – many people involved.
Scientific

Next visual
A white trail of dust / mist through space or a black sky background
Black shapes triangles

Next visual
I see a wooden frame – with a clear interior – like a window.
I can hear water = salty small – deduction ocean
Sense that someone has gone missing.
Discovery long past
Stretching / expanding
Warping Time & Space.

End Session

Seems like you were on the right track until a reptilian saw you and shut you down with the false image of that beachfront

Cool performance! Really interesting! Thank you guys!
I am asking myself all the time if it would make sense to insert a kind of reality check clause into the target procedure, just in case the target is not real or unclear if it is real.
Like: the viewer will perceive target ID X, if the target has no physical reality, then he will perceive the Eiffel Tower (Target Z)
Do you get what I mean?
The Backgound is, if the tasker has a special opinion about the target, this might influence what the viewer sees. I know, that has been discussed before. But it might even go further: things can be manifested by a strong mind and/or a collective. I heard about an artificial ghost appearing within one of these English medial settings. Some participants had invented a character in advance and also invented attributes and a history for this imaginary person from the medival times. Then they made it appear -even visually and as channelling. So what about e.g. a story from a book? It might have become manifested in the morphic field as a concept, which then can be remote viewed as well. The more people believe in it, the stronger gets the manifestation... Maybe the author just wrote: This is a real story! So bias may not only come from the tasker, but also from a "collective mind" or "collective imagination"... If then the tasker gives a task: The viewer will perceive this and that from this book. The result may reflect exactly what was in the book, because it came to manifestation through the believe and imaginiation of the reader-collective. Then the tasker can meditate and try to defocus how much he wants -The result is wrong nontheless...
How to deal with this in a proper (scientific) way?
Do you have an opinion on that?

That's interesting. Like: "if there is no such thing, instead perceive a fuzzy bear" or something. There's a lot of interesting things to try! The more we have people willing to try, the more we can try new things. It's one of the few things that I suspect can never be automated, because it's essentially an isbe doing the work