You could be right - but there was mentioned by a senator ( I can find it) saying the Pentagon is pushing back against the disclosure idea. So I think "Canada" does what it is told when it comes to the US military and Canadian military (politicians).
Releasing data is coming from the US political class- resisting it is the "military" class - (exactly who "they" are is a mystery) -- but everything is probably in flux one way or the other.

July 26 suppose to reveal the names of some of the whistle blowers

Full Announcement - July 26th Hearing.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?529468-1/rep-burchett-oversight-committee-members-upcoming-hearing-uap

I am unsure if this video is real. I am told that it is possible to run videos through a type of program to see it is AI created. I have no idea if it can be real- maybe it is

This week july 26 is suppose to be some big disclosure about some whistle blowers

At the end of this video there is an opinion given that there must be a blanket forgiveness plan -- IF disclosure can come out fully.

And this is true-- It was done in South Africa and it is the only answer. There must be a guarantee that if full disclosure is given -- and all the secrets are revealed then like a deal given to a mobster that he will not be sent to prison if he coughs up all the secrets, the location of all the dead bodies- the number of m urd -ers that were committed because of this secrecy-- then NO ONE GOES TO JAIL !!

THAT DOES HAVE TO HAPPEN- This is so powerful and the "military group" that controls it is poised to move away from humanity and become a controlling power over the rest of humanity that indemnity is the only way to reel them back into the fold. If they don't reveal it -- then they have indemnity anyway. In other words they are so far ahead of us-- they can control everything -- they are untouchable RIGHT NOW.

There is only this little window opening up-- and at this time - this is the opportunity to OFFER INDEMNITY. - TOTAL AND COMPLETE FORGIVENESS RIGHT NOW AND PROTECTION FROM ANY RETRIBUTION FROM ANY QUARTER MUST BE PUT ON THE TABLE = FAST !
Because the Pentagon is trying to silence this stuff and threaten people and trying to get it hidden again. Look at the New York Times - it refused to run this story (if this story is true admittedly )

This, no matter who was killed or tortured or what drugs were sold to millions of people and sadly even what was probably done in labs to humans and children HAS TO BE FORGIVEN. It has to be forgiven because we are finished (by them) if we don't offer it. And we have to find out how bad it was and how close we all came (and still might come) to becoming something like the small grey aliens. A biological robotic entity. !!

after that, all that stuff must be prevented from ever happening again !!!! And we have to be way more involved in what's happening on this planet.

AND GUESS WHAT ! THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY THAT CAN HAPPEN BECAUSE IT CAN ALL GO DARK AGAIN. IT CAN ONLY HAPPEN WITH REMOTE VIEWING AND BECOMING AWAKE AND AWARE !! WHAT FARSIGHT DOES IS THE ONLY ANSWER ULTIMATELY TO THIS STUFF HAPPENING AGAIN .

If this video is real-- then doesn't it make it fair game to be remote viewed ??? I know its a military item or project-- but it has been revealed to the public. It is public material now --

IS THIS A LIGITIMATE REMOTE VIEWING SUBJECT ?

123--- If you saw the last post in this area - ignore the question I asked- I listened to the hidden info again and believe it must be something innocent - just something to alert programmers-- I have no knowledge about that kind of tech

This should be remote viewed if for any reason to see why the ET was having trouble speaking. I mean does it have to be human for us to have compassion? I think if a human sat in their chair everyone would feel saddened and want to know more. If it was a child the same but emotions enhanced. I feel sorry for that being and care about the outcome just the same.

If we were torturing it he being then it was criminal and should be treated as such.

II have removed nearly all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

Unsure of who Julian May is however I will look into it.

Mentioning some group like the flat earth society is a way of disparaging someone's opinions by offering no argument against it but instead trying link someone to a fringe idea. Its a weak "argument to say the least. And a technique attempted in many arguments. One could say well Farsights focus is a fringe idea just as a flat earth argument is a fringe idea therefor remote viewing (in this example) is also ridiculous.

I think the use of the automobile has been very useful however I believe it contributes to asthma in humans. This does not mean for instance that I don't think someone having an asthma attack shouldn't jump into a gas guzzling taxi to race to the hospital. And saying it is ironic that the car hating man (in this example) had to take a taxi to the hospital and didn't take a horse instead is a bit silly.

Cars are very useful to get places and the only way to do so (often), but cars are also a contributor to pollution and therefor asthma. Both can be true.

Just as the concern about AI implementation and the need to use a telephone which has AI in it is also a fact of life. There is little choice but to use it. We cant use carrier pigeons. All its saying is - hey AI really is getting into every device !! This is (and actually the uncontrollability of AI) is also a concern with AI developers themselves (including the "godfather" of AI development). "They" wrote a letter of concern about it themselves.

And yet we could say -- isn't it ironic that AI developers have typed a letter of concern about AI onto a computer and system likely controlled by AI. And therefor AI developers are ridiculous and therefor all their concerns about AI should be discounted. If AI developers are ridiculous (the argument could continue) then why should we use what must therefor must be a ridiculous invention. IE the system of AI ??

That would be an equally silly argument but just as valid - if we were going to accept the first concept then why couldn't the second concept also be valid ?

It would be ironic ! And so what does that mean ? Not much except irony can be found every where. Its not an argument that therefor all these things shouldn't be a concern and shouldn't be discussed.

All I am doing is expressing an opinion as is everyone else -- none of us likely can claim much more than that (except Dr Brown) who I am quite sure does have a Phd.

Global warning is likely happening
The fact that global warming is happening does not prove that we made it happen because global warming has happened in the past even before humans were living on this planet. So if global warming happened without our help couldn't it therefor be happening the same way now ?

AI is likely a real hazard as its being developed now. That does not mean in a well studied and controlled way that AI couldn't be useful in some form in the future. A criticism of AI is not a criticism of all computer programs in the future. Its a criticism of the scientists who want to be allowed to develop anything at all - without any oversight.

The existence of a Flat Earth society ( a fringe idea) means therefor all fringe ideas are invalid. The theory of Tectonic Plate theory was a fringe idea not to long ago but now proven to be true.

And in 1995 it was the prevailing idea that planet development was extremely rare. The idea then was really there were no planet seen through weak telescopes -- therefor this "proves" or really does not mean there are other planets just because our solar system has planets ! Really that was the going idea not too long ago. Yet the fringe idea that planets were every where around suns has now been proven. Yet it was a fringe idea. It did not mean - a fringe idea was proven true -- there for the flat earth society should be accepted because it too is a fringe idea.

I am reminded of an academic joke. One day a professor was talking to his students in the class about his trip to Scotland where he saw herds of sheep. He said " as I drove up the hill I saw sheep that had all recently been shorn of their wool and they were grazing on the hillside in the sunshine.

Excuse me professor -- a young man said. You could only have seen one side of the sheep's body as being shorn and one cannot make the assumption that both sides had been shorn of wool. Therefor sir, with great respect to you, your statement that you saw fully shorn sheep cannot be assumed as automatic. They could have been only shorn of wool on one side of their bodies.

Yes the class said nodding their heads. The student is making a very valid scientific point they said.

But anyway I am only expressing my opinions. And all of this is just entertainment. Is real purpose is just for Dr Brown to see what's of interest out there on his site. Our opinions are not facts.

I will try to be more actuate and make more sense with my postings in the future. I get sloppy a lot of the time.

I have removed nearly all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters

Thanks for the info !

I've just watched the full 2 hours of the sub-committee hearing... Mostly what I'd heard before, but a couple of other bits I hadn't.

A couple of questions I would have asked are:

"Tell us of any reprisals that have occurred to anyone who has either been a whistleblower, or been in the military and done a report on a UAP, or even merely spoken about them - both officially and unofficially" (It's one thing to talk about reprisals, but quite different to actually outline them as fact!)

Similarly, "Tell us about any civilian UFO reporting or discussion agencies that have been targeted, and what happened".

"What sort of non-official deterrents have been made against you or any that you know of, e.g., friends or others who have strenuously discouraged you, or those you know of".

I'm not in the US, so unless I cheat it, I can't get those questions forwarded to the relevant people.

(as Ross Coulthart observed, Foxx was just wasting time! She had a great question, and then shut down Grusch's answer to do some politicising! What a waste of space!!!)

I have removed nearly all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters