And what about believe?!
How enough is to be skeptical.. where's that line, where's the end, where since skepticism is based on a non-believe belief and the pre-determination itself by "facts based" that is also created by a belief of one-self (in this case) in the ways those facts are held accountable.
"You" believe we can never be too much or 100% of one thing nor can anyone be the same as the other one with it's own belief systems.
Now of course, there's a question of sanity involved, wich is also a question embedded of what is considered the base structure in a collective society, in terms of a belief systems, or in this case close enough to what is consciously considered to be the truth.
Everything outside of those lines it starts to go outside "the normal", and more into fantasy land or insanity!
But never once evolution occupies a safe place, and has in itself the variable of being one thing only.
It has a tail of infinite truths in regards of what each civilization manifests itself throughout creation.
So you can never be too skeptical but you also have to.. you can never be to outside the realm of "reality" but you also have to.. you can never be too much in the middle but you have too.
That's one of the reasons there's so many of us with it's own belief systems within this collective coming together going forth what i can call a greater good, because in the end that's what we are doing.
So for me im going to believe, and i choose to believe in the unknown and also believe in others that i resonate more with, but in the mean time im also going to be skeptical and im going to fact check my self and others, because im not in the same mood everyday and by knowing that, that's my attempt to be in the middle moving forward, to bring balance (talking about common values!!)
Now, with all of this being said..
What determines a good evidence from my understanding is a set of pre-requisites determined by a collective belief system that brings the evidence closer to the truth, or what it is determined by common ground, once again by the collective to be the truth (once again truth is a never ending procedure, what it is today isn't tomorrow, but there is a base in the universe, wich is also "part" of the existence.)
So it's the same saying that is a political discernment, for example,
it's like hearing AARO hearings with the senate where they explain how they do the procedures of identifying an anomaly, in the end they came up with a conclusion, never 100%, but close to.. (what they believe to be by what the data suggests) and most of the time i ask the question how many times are they revealling the truth, because of some issue with their agenda, where they say its not this or that and i now with every bone of my body that it is the truth!
What about intuition!
So what i found from a last resource of all the procedure is that if there is a testimony and depending on the quality/credibility of the witness it is taken as a last resource, in other words, the belief system of that same person.
a group of navy personnel in the Sub encounter through audio an anomaly 620ftunderwater, they do a report presenting all the data collected, all that data follows a set of procedures and in the end the marine gives his testimony from his own perception wich is align with is belief system, what he believe to be true, he never makes assumptions or say it was an ET craft, and sometimes nor even an USO Unidentified Submerged Object, but even there in the military, from what i understood they are open for conspire of ,its a human process.
We need to believe!