UFO hearing, first of probably and hopefully many hearings.
UFO Hearing: Lawmakers hear from three witnesses
General
· 2 replies
· 394 views
· 3 followers
Richard L Buchanan
This is still what I believe to be a fully engineered piecemeal reward by our captors, with the plain goal of "kicking the can down the road," as Courtney describes.
I know it makes me the buzzkiller, but I would urge curbing enthusiasm about the matter. Exactly what they want is for you to feel the satisfaction of a victory, feel more vindicated and less motivated to push any harder, and just delay the resolution of this on and on and on, because the goal is not to keep ufo disclosure indefinitely hidden. The goal is to keep it in suspense just long enough so that the other matters of (manufactured) desparation in the planet continue to escalate, to the point that we feel no desire to question the motives of ETs that come forward to offer a deal.
ASK yourself: Why did these people decide not to align with Dr. Stephen Greer? Why did congress not want to discuss the matter with the Disclosure project? Why, out of the blue, these 3 people come out of nowhere, and are suddenly organized into an interview with congress? They are a *controlled* disclosure.
We will continue to parade and celebrate the "progress" that we are being fed, and when the deal is offered in our hour of desperation, we will just throw our hands up and say "maybe they're just the good guys, they've been nice to us so far."
Every damn time you are just casually handed something from congress, and from hollywood, and from CNN . . . when all the while beforehand they've been shoving you in the dark at every turn . . . --- stop - and - question - it ---
Think about what this does to the community. People were starting to film UAP on their *own* with their *own* cameras. If you read between the lines, this message is suggesting "you don't have to do any of that anymore. We've come out now. Trust our narrative once again*
Don't -- buy -- people's -- crap!!
I do appreciate some of this perspective, but I think there's also other elements you aren't considering.
Firstly, you're right - there are now a LOT more people filming this, and so denying the obvious would be just stupid.
Also, there have been good people who have tried to come forwards before, and not much has happened. But, the timing is better now (considering the above point about availability of data), and some of those from earlier times are stepping up a bit now. Grusch was, largely, just the most recent. In a way, he's the questionable, given this timing! But, I do hope that he does have the info he's been suggesting.
Lastly, although the government is certainly not on the side of the people, they are still people themselves, and having other parts of government kick them the same way that the people have been kicked is helpful to us. So, having that hearing is good in that it shows the good members of congress and senate (and one should presume there are at least a couple of good ones!) that, on one sense, they're not actually perceived as being part of the real 'government' of the country, but just a bunch of hicks who got elected by the ignorant masses. (somewhat reminiscent of 'Yes, (Prime) Minister')
So, it's not really that 'government' as most people think of that is going to slow down or halt (or manipulate) disclosure - it's the real ones (like the public services, 3 letter abbreviations, Pentagon, etc etc).
Why wasn't Greer's Disclosure Project involved in this?? Good question! Maybe because they're taking the legal route, and so can't be while doing so?
Richard L Buchanan
taz
Richard L Buchanan
I do agree in absolutely with the two points from you guys, All of this in my view is completely manipulated, and we now it is, the question is who's who? we never assume, or at least try to. There's a lot of questions without answers, it is a big movie.
I also have questions into why David Spergel from the UAP program from Nasa didn't go to the hearings since he was invited?! and now NASA is trying to throw sand to our eyes, in my opinion, in creating coming hearings with what they call "legit" scientists to speak about Extra-Terrestial or uap's in response to the hearings of the congress.
Let us not forget also the 4 hours of the UAP's program live to the public where nothing good came from that, and also the AARO hearings where the members explained the process of investigating these ufo's phenomena.
I can see almost a correlation between AARO and UAP's program of NASA in terms of porpouse, and then i also see the 3 witnesses that came forward in this congress hearings in wich all of them are former air force and one of them was part of the intelligence task force of analysis to the Pentagon and with this being said, let's remind also that everything he says is pre-approved by the pentagon, i also see Dr. Steven Greer, wich i have a lot of question since there is records of him with the Rotschilds many years ago next to Linda Moulton and others known in the ufo community, and also, we are talking about a former CIA member talking about the ET's are all good, but i also see the whistleblowers that Dr. Steven Greer brought to his disclosure meeting, wich for me have legitimacy.
I am also seeing the news from the MSM in regards of these hearings, thats a knew for me since they are usually the ones devaluating the truth, so this is also a red flag for me.
I also see Forbes with the Slogan
" Nobody Cares About David Grusch’s UFO Revelations - Aliens exist, but nobody cares."
humm Where did i hear this?!
But also another thing i agree is with Shiningbrow in regards of the humaness of the members of congress and senate, that was something that i also felt, and the fact that the diferent party members comming together and agreeing upon the same porpouse, that i felt was good.
In the end of the day with all of these questions and everything that is happening, hearings with this level are happening and it's also a huge step, to where i have no idea, one can only hope the best and work in that process.