I came across this suggested interview with the moderator of the RV Discord server.
I really like his down to earth attitude, as well as the very important amount of scepticism for anything that can't actually be verified externally. (While I *believe* in UFOs and ETs etc etc, his take on how RVers can tap into a mindset where they pick up an *idea* of something, and flesh out the *idea*, rather than a "real" physical target is really important. Hence why I also think the CICO+ and economic forecasts are SO important here!!!)
His background makes for an interesting intro to the subject.
At about 1:18 he makes some good points about doing RV as a beginner (which I'm sure we've all heard before, but I liked his idea of (basically) "tell lie about it")
Still watching.....
Experienced viewers will be able to tell the difference. Both between being tasked with something like a comic book (dull, lifeless) or someone's confabulation (typically picking up the person in the process of thinking it up) and a legitimate target. But it can frustrate novice to intermediate viewers.
Does this also apply to thought forms that have been manifesting tor thousands of years, but tens of thousands (or b/millions) of people? Especially with LOTS of emotions attached...
Or... things that have been intentionally mocked up to deceive viewers?
I have removed all of my comments on these Fora due to ongoing jealous hostility by certain posters