Harvey and Courtney have said that this battle is largely about free will. That if government representatives sign certain treaties we're done for. For now I'll leave alone tye question of a rigged ekection, or whether someone can fairly win an election as "free will" by constant lies and rhetoric
But how about the legalese? state National theory demonstrates how one can escape all the legalese. By even their own twisted sick laws, these state Nationals are no longer represented by these scum representatives
So is there any particular reason that doesn't go into the conversation? I ask because I feel like it poses a legitimate way out of this mess. Is it just a feeble limb? Or is it something with potential but just too much of a satellite topic? Just curious about this avenue and Farsight's opinion.