Time being fluid, and the possibility that choice create new time lines of experience and possibilities for is to be. There is the possibility in remote viewing another time unlike a location could be influenced by the thoughts of the one setting up the viewing experiment as to their desire to explore a particular possibility, without them knowing. For instance, if choices made it possible that Jesus died on the cross, did not die on the cross and completed his goal of enlightening the world, and that another person died in his place are all possible time lines that exist out there and ones are exploring and living these timelines concurrently. If a person from one time line wants people to explore this concept, and is wondering if the possibility existed that someone else died in his place, could that thought guide the viewers to that particluar time line instead of say the one in which he died or in which he completed his goal. Just a thought. Desire and thought create reality.
I am going to try to organise what was written here...
A) Fluidity of Time & Choices Creating New/Alternate Time-Lines
B) Belief in the Possibility That Alternate Time-Lines Influence Remote-Viewing of Current Time-Line Unbeknownst to Remote-Viewers and Experimenters of Current Time-Line
C) Speculation About a Time-Line Where The Messiah Was Actually Crucified Versus Another Where Not; Additional Speculation That Both Time-Lines Exist & Are Being Explored Concurrently in R-V
D) Question About Whether Sub-Conscious Thoughts Result in Defaulting to a Time-Line Where the Messiah was Never Crucified Rather Than a Time-Line Where He Was Actually Crucified
E) Influence of Desires & Thoughts Upon Reality
I am compelled to respond as follows...:
Re : A) Whilst the Mandela-Effect and Double-Slit Experiments demonstrate that there seem to be such things as parallel-realities, from what I have observed and experienced with the phenomena, I would describe them more as time-pockets, rather than time-lines; nor should mere thoughts/choices be sufficient to «create another time-line» without being backed up by massive amounts of energy
Re : B) I am going to mention and come back to this word : Convergence. If you are of the mind-set that one single alternate time-line has a significant-influence upon another or current or present time-line, then, you should also consider the influence of literally thousands or even millions or billions or trillions or zillions of other time-lines also having an influence which comes across to me as being and having too much «noise» to the point where it would be over-whelming for anybody to even attempt to R-V
Re : C) Some beliefs can be very difficult to over-come. Even I took a whole year and a half of reading all of his writings before I was finally convinced beyond all reasonable doubt that the very Messiah himself had already returned (re-incarnated) and was/is already amongst us. Regarding time-lines, I view it as the Quantum-Version of the Five Blind Men Feeling & Describing Different Parts of the Elephant Phenomenon, and, I wish to come back to that word : Convergence.
You see, for the animé-series known as Stein's Gate revolved around Time-Travel, and, regardless of what the M-C did to try to change the eventual-fates, Convergence always took effect; even in the Mandela-Effect differences, Nelson Mandela was always imprisoned no matter what, and, also always died no matter what; for me who knows that only ONE «Law» exists, that still makes a lot of sense, even if you were to try to convert or change time-lines, for, that ONE «Law» stipulates : «Everything that you or your servants do and express unto others will be done and expressed unto you (including all of the collateral-effects)» which makes «time-lines» irrelevant; one simply cannot escape their Karmic-Fate;
This makes it more likely that the «scape-goat» was going to become the scape-goat no matter what; additionally, does it really make sense to you that, within the very bible itself, that amongst the most-trusted and loyal of the Messiah's followers/friends would /actually/ «betray» the man ?
You would need some really damn good story about how a follower and student of the very Messiah himself was unable to resist against such an act of demonic-possession to the point where he'd do the very equivalent of betraying and sacrificing what would be the equivalent of his very own best friend or Idol or Master or someone whom he even looks up to as a Hero; for this reason I find it extremely difficult if not impossible to believe that such a «time-line» (or even time-pocket) ever existed where the very Messiah himself «sinned» enough in his past to be crucified himself.
Re : D) I thought my response to this part was going to be longer but just see/re-read B & C above...
Re : E) Thoughts & Desires only influence the decisions that one choose to make in reality; one must control their thoughts in order to control their emotions so that their emotions don't take control of them to make them do something that they will regret; whilst thoughts may be able to produce a reality in thought-form, thoughts & desires in of themselves do not change physical-reality; if you think you can control reality through your thoughts alone then be my guest and see how far you get by trying to do farming via thoughts alone rather than physically watering and tending to the plants...
I also happen to be the current voluntary successor to the Messiah himself so I can most-certainly clarify the teachings of the very Messiah himself in a much more accurate manner than any other mortal currently in existence; and, before this is mis-interpreted as calling myself the next Messiah, I only mean that I am carrying out his efforts & duties (or at least attempting to) from where his current life-incarnation left off in this life-time, due to the «retirement» of his «pen» from several years ago. The True Gospels of Jesus (and Terence) are written by his very own hand, now available to present-generations of humans, and, you can read them at the following link...
You make very good points. How about this. If all time lines exist and are available because we can influence reality by ourselves or collectively then what we find important - that then --becomes our reality ?
Maybe, we are as though in a boat. By changing OUR reality it is like paddling our boat towards a certain direction. Now if only one person is thinking of "that" reality then the boat moves only slightly in that direction. But if more and more people think intensely about a certain reality - say that UFOs exist or Peace and/or it would be a very good thing that humanity come together into one cohesive group , Then that realty truly becomes a reality -- it MANIFESTS ITSELF. Maybe ?
Now more to your point I have heard another theory which is that there are not many time lines. HOWEVER the theory continues there is sort of a swirling of POSSIBLE realities -- and it is only at a certain point when all the people here have sort of decided which reality they wish to manifest--- only then all of us see our reality -- because it then manifests itself.
I don't have a clue which is correct but it is interesting. And I think it could be correct about what you are saying - I wonder how anything can be hidden from our unconscious. It would seem at some level consciousness KNOWS everything because it is part of the universal consciousness. And by its very definition Universal Consciousness encompasses everything.
So saying "OH I DID NOT WHAT I WAS TASKED TO DO" ! AND EVEN MY TASKER WAS JUST HANDED AN ENVELOPE AND HE DIDNT KNOW EITHER. Well consciousness knew everything and if consciousness knows everything on some level then -- there are no secrets at all.
So to Remote View is really more like learning to contact our consciousness by rubbing the fog off of our eyes. Then we get a glimpse of what was there all along. But here is something to address what you were asking (maybe). Perhaps the remote viewer wants to see a different reality because that is where he/she want to go or see. I suppose that's why now you see Dick Algire and Schwartz using something like a collective remote viewing style. And Farsight uses that too. They have several people remote view the same subject or target. Some times each one sees something a little different. Is that wrong ? Or is it more what you are saying ?