Dr. Brown, I could use more perspective into telepathy vs. remote viewing. Is this something you can answer in a future intelligence briefing? Please let me explain in more detail-
At this point I am current on all of the videos you have put together, including recordings from other shows where you are a guest.
I’ve spent the past couple of years going through all of the mini series content, reading the books you suggest, specifically Walking Among Us and Alien Interview. I’m basically fully bought in to the mission you are working. I’ve gone through (and still am going through) the multi-layered depressive and hopelessness feelings that come with the ramifications of the prison planet and other truths being worked through the process of Remote Viewing.

Remote Viewing is incredible and I’ve practiced it a little bit (with lackluster results though), but I found what you said most thought-provoking in the third installment of New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove’s interview with you as you described the discipline of trying to avoid target contamination.
I have some questions that may sound like I’m challenging what you and your team have discovered. Please know this is not the case. My goal is to feel fully confident in the results.

How do we know that the unverifiable elements to a remote viewing session are not inadvertently influenced by the imaginations of the target creator? How do you manage that? Are you the only one creating the target across all of the projects? Or are there others from, say, the board of directors, that create the target?
What do you do and how do you advise the remote viewers when they are not going in the right direction with their results after the first paper session (this is sometimes eluded to in videos from remote viewers that you validate with them to keep going to try again)?
Are there results that don’t make it to publishing because they are not the target?

At an absolute minimum, these experiments prove that telepathy exists across spacetime, which is so strikingly significant that it deserves extreme recognition across the scientific community.
However, from other interviews of sharing under-the-hood, so to speak, of how you and your team do it, I am extremely interested if you can describe in a future intelligence briefing how a target event stays uncontaminated by the target creator’s possible unconscious influence.

Thank you and the team for doing these projects, it is the most interesting and meaningful work perhaps any of us can be doing right now.