Ok Farsight, you say they are dedicated to telling the truth? In that case, I dare you to do a project that exposes humans participating in the same kind of blood sacrifices and sexual abuse that the reptilians are involved with. We know the reptilian feed off of pain and fear, and you have had previous projects proving this.

Make a project that show powerful and famous humans taking part in these atrocities, like Alex Jones, David Icke and Cathy O'Brien claims.

Last time I suggested this, people on the forum said: No dont do that. Farsight could get shut down, etc.

Do it, if you wanna tell the truth like you claim.

Possible projects include Pizza gate, Epsteins Island, QAnon, MKUltra.

Or is the real truth, that you wanna avoid these types of projects because they are too unsavory for the public or you fear the consequences of exposing it? Or maybe it's because you cannot confront this level of evil.

I posted this over on the video thread, but I'll do it again.

@ Morten - What would you do if FS did decide to do such a session, and none of the data came back with your version of 'truth'?

Would you:

A) discredit FS as a shill, and who continues to cover up all of those things that are part of your 'truth'?

or B) admit you were wrong?

(Adding the possibility of C) here - admit you were wrong on *that* particular thing, but still right/have the 'truth' about all the others?)

(there's a more obvious path here, but pouts one in a bad position - saying that the FS session was off target for some reason ("Oh, they've been blocked, and *my 'truth'* is still true, but RV can't prove it!") - however, that leads to a very bad position logically.... accepting that FS & RV are real and works, but not when it's something you personally disagree with... that would leave open the door to deny any proposition you don't want to accept)

This is a serious question for any believers of any thing at all.... what would be sufficient evidence to change (generic) your beliefs? Because if the answer is "nothing", then there's absolutely no point in trying to even discuss the topic with (generic) you.

Personally, I look at FS (and all RV data) with scepticism... it *could* be true and correct - but I'd need more - better - evidence to convince me that what's come up in the session is actually true and correct. (and, no, simply being 'on target' - describing the thing that's part of the target - is *not* sufficient evidence!!! That just tells me that RV in general is a valid data gathering source - but doesn't mean it's perfect)

@Shiningbrow - Thanks for your questions. I would surely accept answers retrieved in a properly done FS Project. I generally believe it, when 3-5 remote viewers, working totally blind, bears witness to much the same thing, although I don't always agree with the conclusions drawn by CB afterwards.

I, like any other person, have certain beliefs and values, and it would be very beneficial to EVERYONE if FS used RV to debunk and demystify conspiracy theories that are not based in anything factual. In my opinion, 50% of getting to the truth, is showing things that are factual and the other 50% are eliminating false beliefs. FS concentrates on the former, and lacks the latter. Maybe they actually do those projects, that ends up disproving a former assumption, but then don't publish them. If that is the case, it's a mistake in my opinion.

What I see when watching FS projects etc, is a clear projectory that indicates that a lot of those things that people like David Icke, Alex Jones, Cathy O'Brien and others are claiming could actually be true, but then seeing FS not going all the way down the rabbit hole. I don't know why. Maybe its not my version of the truth that's the problem, but that FS doesn't want THEIR version of the truth to get challenged too much.

I would encourage FS to get cracking on the conspiracy theory issues, no matter how many toes they might step on and how graphic it might get. This requires a great ability to CONFRONT the truth. I would be the first to admit it, if a project proved a theory to be false, and I would be happy about it too.

Well, there's a couple of issues here anyway...

Firstly, is simply time (and, apparently, the financial costs involved... RV sessions are not done on a voluntary basis... I have no ide what the money is like for an RVer, but I presume it's not $20) In relation to that, I believe that there's some sort of overlording of FS (as with many other groups), and so the projects aren't always of their own choice.

Secondly - you do realise that you are effectively asking the RVers to and watch the sacrifice - murder - and rape of children - right??? This is actually your intent!

Now, that can be alleviated by firstly doing an ARV - If X person (no, don't do groups - it makes it less accurate) has participated in Y (specific) event, then draw an apple... if they have not, then draw a pencil. That at least gives some baseline for whether to go further (for that individual and event).

I do agree about showing not only those that 'work' and those that don't. It's the same thing in the research field in general - as stated by a few of the editors (and sometimes, -in-chief) of various medical journals.. they've called for a database to be set up for *ALL* research projects, and thus for *ALL* research to get published, no matter what the results... otherwise, there's a *HUUUUGGGEEEEE* BIAS in place!

Personally, I think that RV should be used to find the *evidence* for those things that are fact... Not merely to determine whether something is actually true or not (because, many people won't accept RV alone - such as myself!)

I do agree with your thoughts about CB - he does have a knack for reading more into a session than may be warranted.