Dear Farsight, or Harvey, or whatever, whoever.
I am trying very hard to angle in on the very base of the matter of perhaps what we can call our struggle, our war, our prison, our problem, whatever.
The thing is that I'm afraid there's an area in which I don't see the clarity I need and if it doesn't get resolved by Harvey, or by a very specialized project, or whatever . . . it just all starts to fall apart for me and leads me to ask just how true the organization is.
You say that the deceivers of our world like Channelers and news broadcasters etc will use truth mixed in with lies in order to lie more proficiently (Machiavellis). But then how does that relinquish Farsight from being one of those sources? I know that remote viewing works, I've seen the evidence. And I know that the use of Remote Viewing, combined with our own reasoning, combined with some important movements like exposing UFOs - is helpful and crucial. But what makes me think that where Farsight is going is not leading some astray?
In a world where we seem to all agree that we must be cautious about whom to trust, then I am tempted to perpetually be both distrusting and interested in nearly all ideas and options that are out there. But I want to move onto my main point.
It's this contract thing. This contract thing that you guys talk about that ruins the entire machine for me and if we don't get more clarity on the contract thing, I have trouble believing where you're all going with this.
Okay, so the contract thing goes something like this . . .
We are in a war. The war has prisoners of war. The enemy is holding the prison, we are in the prison, and the enemy has offered rules of engagement. Within these rules of engagement, the enemy operates in grey areas and commits fraud.
This is the exact spot where I need clarification on if there is any to be found. What I don't understand, and what I need to see at least some strong attempts to explain, for me to give it more credibility.
You've said in the past that they hold the cards. They hold the keys. They have every conceivable capability to bomb this planet into oblivion, and if threatened enough they will.
If "good guys" were to beam down or fly down and greet everyone like in Star Trek: First Contact or whatever - that's the off-side. You lose the ball, because the enemy says "nope you went too far. Bye-bye planet. Everyone's dead, we suck all the souls, pack them up and take them somewhere else." They lose a major asset and position in the Galaxy but keep the primary assets they wanted. Maybe there's a spilloff of some kind. I don't know.
But why is this any different from the enemy making a whole bunch of reserved decisions about when to strike? Maybe they have their own secret default data point in which there are too many remote viewers and that's the trigger point. Too many people can do this, so we blow up the planet, bye everyone. It's over.
Courtney, when you made your analogy about the Zebras, this made rather some sense to me because it alluded to a population operating in a rather unpredictable nature which becomes hard to tame. That could include using cryptocurrencies to derail the manufactured fraudulent market. Crypto is generally still fiat but if it's peer to peer at least it's harder to control. If people develop unique technologies and stop trying to operate them legally (because the law seems built on fraud anyways) then what does it matter?
If you get gangs. Like literal gangs that murder and steal and break things (oh here we go, the feds are ready to delete the post now) - is that not the "zebra" analogy? Research "sons of liberty" as an example of what I mean. Why are these not ideal?
And when we have so many projects of President Biden, President Biden, President Biden, does the population not see that "President Biden" is the CEO of a coroporation known as the United States Inc. listed on Dunn and Bradstreet, as a subsidiary of the Crown Corporation, whose central office is located in London the City. They have no jurisdiction in the United States of America unincorporated. The Republic that wrote the Constitution. That is why when you go to a "US Inc" courtroom, your rights don't seem to apply.
At this juncture, a person can take one of two narratives. They can say "to hell with the law it all seems to be built on fraud anyway" and then set up "caliphates" like Waco (look up caliphate of course and the mainstream narrative wants you to look at it as low grade middle east terrorists. It's not it's the concept of saying to hell with whatever country or state you live in and militarizing your community and operating rogue)
The second narrative that one can take is to say that the law has some sort of internal structure. This structure permeates from the individuals (people walking around that you're looking at right now, posting stuff, drinking coffee and whatever other stupid things) and carries its structure all the way to the top (the Vatican, "Washington" which is not a state, London the City with all their ridiculously strange concepts and satanic child raping adrenochrome stuff)
And I suppose a third narrative which is just a combination of the two, blending your chocolate and vanilla ice cream to make the population perhaps just a little less predictable. Through it all, of course using remote viewing as one of the defenses / weapons toward the endgame.
But this is the main point I want to go back to. Why the contract? What is it about this contract? Please elaborate about this contract? The contract that you say exists and yet cannot be disclosed to the public. The contract that is constructed under all types of fraud. Why? Why is this a relevant piece? If you're going to go the route of acknowledging secret contracts, then why aren't you talking about an individual's ability to contract out of the system and declare their immunity to this legalese trap? If one files their revocation of election, proclaiming themself as a state National, foreign ambassador, non-resident Alien to the US Inc. , and still a Sovereign as defined by Black's Law 4th Ed, and state citizen as is decreed by a diplomatic passport, how then is this not a relevant avenue by which the "president" of nothing but US Inc (and has nothing to do with republic of USA unincorporated), signs a contract with some extraterrestrials, whose jurisdiction can ONLY be within the corporation that exists in a filing cabinet in Washington DC and has no jurisdiction on the literal ground that spans the continent of north america, then how does this contract have any standing over any people whom have filed themselves as state Nationals and revoked their election.
For people who think it's all fake, just look up 5 star diplomatic passports and the people holding them. How are they able to hold these passports *issued by the state passport office* by filing their revocation if all of this is fake?
If you're going to talk contracts and law, then let's talk contracts and law. Let's talk about the Uniform Commercial Code, and the articles of confederation, and the Constitution, and their machinations and relevancies. If it's about somebody signing a contract, and that's where it gets down to the wire - then talk about the legal framework with which that contract exists. How in the galaxy can Harvey's group have respect for this contract and yet sidestep the entire machinations of contract law and our legal system?
If you're going to talk cold war, in which there aren't really any rules except grey areas, then talk about cold war. Talk about operating subversively, battening down the hatches. Considering that group that you remote viewed of these folks that built underground bunkers and coordinated their efforts with back-of-the-skull cybernetics. Playing a cat-and-mouse game of going to the surface, bombing some enemy territory, retreating, and so on. How is their plot not relevant?
Are you saying it's both? Are we saying fight terrorism with terrorism, while simultaneously playing the legal game that isn't really legitamete because so many agencies are committing crime within the legal framework?
Why are some of these avenues for ignoring? When we talk about free energy, or just fringe science in general, of course we're not talking about "improved quality of life." Of course we're not talking about having a happy tea party in the prison instead of breaking out. We're talking about some weaponry, and abilities to act independently. If we continue on the path of zombie-like desperately seeking employment and studying our brains out to get ahead and keep up with taxation, then we don't have the time or attention span to learn to remote view anyways. If we're talking about zones which militarize themselves and live tax-free so that they can allot some time to remote view, how is that not beneficial? Or if we're talking about people who find legal loopholes that befuddles their local authorities, and at least buys enough time that they can have some affluency to focus more on communicating telepathically, how is that not a relevant strategy?
We're not after the cookies. We're after the zebra effect.
Or, put it this way.
Suppose the narrative is like this: "we're the good guys. We're not trying to steer you any direction at all. That's what makes us the good guys. We're saying 'do what thou wilt' at least for now. Build caliphates, subvert the supposed mainstream legalese, be Assanges and Kacinskys and 2A powerhouses. In fact, just don't let anyone steer you at all because you know it's the bad guys if they try to steer you anywhere."
If we're letting the mainstream fade in the dust, then why is a contract constructed with our mainstraem chicanerous laws a relevant factor for what we're doing?
The whole thing falls apart for me when we talk about this contract that we seem to have no power over being a relevant piece.
Am I making any sense? I guess that's enough. I'd love to hear input, I'll review in a week or so. Thanks.
Tazz,
Ok I finally digested your post above and your after my own heart he he. Your due diligence, perceptions & points with the legal/Law/contract/consent denominator is 100 !!!
I have found many answer to you exact concerns. Are mine correct, 100% or in a word immutable? IDK for sure, for a reason.
But in short[lol]→ the TIME here goes way beyond the 3-4 thousands of years of written his-story we had available before the internet to hundreds of thousands of earth years.
The sources for us to disseminate data i.e. bible[s] tablets, scrolls, cuneiform, Sumerian etc. etc. etc. and then spoken word, historys/events passed down blah blah......I am confident you understand this.
Now with all that I have said, following a learned process of culling DATA for trend, topic, TRUTH. THen all the filtering or dissemination & discernment to a bad taste of what potentially could be the closest to [truth] it well, your about to oR you have prompted me to work up a data dump of my own.
Mostly because of YOUR DATA and/ or the capability you have presented. I find we have the same understanding[s] and walls to target . . . . . . so to say.
YES you presented well and "made sense"
YES it was enough, thank you.
YES my input is coming to answer......promise.
AlwaysForward~Godspeed
A couple of things struck me. Perhaps I can add a bit more perspective. You might be overcomplicating things. There's a lot of misunderstanding around the idea of contracts, especially in the New Age movement, which makes it sound like we're to blame for every bad thing that happens. Its important to first ground ourselves in reality (as above, as below, is a universal truth).
Firstly, let's look at the rules of warfare, psyops and intelligence agencies: The best psyop uses 100% truth, but simply fails to present an important view point. All sides could be telling you the truth, but its the bad side that omits the most important detail that would give you maximum agency (set you free). So, letting yourself hear as many view points as possible will expand your agency and eventually, you will see a way out. You have nothing to lose by listening to a bad source, as long as you do not allow yourself to be 100% guided by only bad sources, but at least one true source. And the more sources you listen to, the more likely you will encounter the "key." Trust yourself and your innate power to discern the final truth. This is a struggle to regain your freedom. No way out of that.
Secondly, you are overthinking the contract. Quantum mechanics says that even light does not travel from one atom to another unless all matter in the universe agrees to it. Its like a big clock where everything is in agreement. People who point out spiritual contracts made before this life, are pointing out something that are pointless to believe and focus on. That can only take away your agency. Its a good litmus test: believe those things that give you more agency in the here and now.
But we are not talking about that universal, abstract level of contract. We are talking about a military contract, essentially. The reptilians don't need to talk to you to get your consent, cause you already handed over your consent to your government and you continue to do so every time you pay taxes or follow a law. The government has a monopoly on violence, so they'll kill you to keep you in line. The bad ETs only respect military contracts, because they only understand brute force. As far as they're concerned, you are just a slave to the military or your respective country and all countries are slaves to America, cause it has the most powerful military.
The good ETs know that's tyranny, and that everything must be done via constant continual consent of all parties. They don't hold you to something you may or may not have agreed to, especially if it was done unconsciously. Only a slave master would do that. Jesus said to forgive all debts and ask others to forgive our debts and form no long term contracts. Yeah, that's right. Debt is slavery. Only bad ETs hold you to contract and debt cause you are just a slave to them. You cannot evolve under slavery. You can only remain stagnant.
You are a powerful ISBE. Increase your agency by believing in that and be careful not to believe anything to the contrary. Broadcasting telepathically, that you do not consent and that you want to be free, is a good start, because, although ignored by the evil forces, it is registered by higher, more powerful forces as an invitation for assistance in your liberation process.