Everything I've seen about the written law tells me that a contract signed by the United States military is not a free will choice of the People, not representative of planet Earth, and not of the people of United States of America unincorporated,

Now if we're talking about the United Nations, that's a different story. They are part of a corporate enterprise but it was still created through fraud and conspiracy, not free will.

if no member of Farsight is willing to address that with the Galactic Federation of Worlds (Harvey and company) , I'm suspicious that Farsight is a psyop and I'm funneling money into the wrong paywall.

And I mean specifically address that concern, not like a bunch of complaining or "we're frustrated with you guys" or other vague complaints, I mean just that specifically: please explain the contract as a free will choice or at least withdraw your claim of it being a "free will choice"

I could easily picture a psyop that uses the confirmation of remote viewing (again, a piece of truth) to redirect the crowd into further passivity or control.

If that were the lean, then I guess I would rely on photography technology and independent remote viewing.

That's one other thing. They focus on the technology given to them by an air traffick controller. All this hard work putting together a giant team to meet everybody on the beach, and this giant team can't just offer the technology themselves. What about the discoveries made by Nikonp1000 - it is suggesting to us that stars are not really stars the way NASA describes, and the curvature just doesn't seem present at the distances that it can photograph.

All of this interplanetary engagement, not a mention of these other pieces of evidence.

And: "now through all of this I want everyone to know that I'm not this big Kahuna ... but I am the Earth ambassador from the Galactic federation of worlds and despite the fact that they can routinely fly down with ships, I'm biologically indistinguishable from every day humans because not doing so would be a violation of our contract with the enemy which also contracted you with their free will choice"

E - X - P - L - A - I - N

Suggest you consider the fictional entity known as "The Culture" from the novels of Iain Banks and Iain M Banks.

I'm not saying it is a full explanation, rather it might make you think of the difficulties of a vastly superior technology base successfully bringing a less advanced interstellar contact race into the ruleset of interplanetary, interstellar and inter dimensional relationships.

While I'm advising research material, perhaps the novels of Julian May might offer some insights in that area as well. All though, that is a longer read and includes time portals.

I'm not saying you'll get ALL the answers there, but you might evolve some kind of progress path. Some idea of the stepping stones involved.

Tazz you raise some good concerns, I also would like to understand more the background story of how the Farsight team got to work with Harvey and his team from a few years back and how we know for sure that they are among the good ETs and not a potential "psy op" as you mentioned. My intuition tells me that the Farsight team have their hearts in the right direction but I would still like to have a greater understanding of their discernment which ET group is good or bad. As Courtney mentioned, many New Age channelers are also easily duped by bad ETs who can arouse feelings of "pure love" to make these New Agers trust them. I just want to know the steps that Courtney takes to validate Harvey and his team and avoid the same pitfall as those New Agers.

But at the end of the day, after going through all the various sources of information out there, I would still say Farsight's is the most credible, outside of personally mastering RV and verifying the information myself.

"...outside of personally mastering RV and verifying the information myself."

Hmmm. Y'know, one thing about studying RV is - you never get ALL the answers from any particular session or target.

This is good really, life without surprises would be very dull indeed. Joe McMoneagle only views for himself nowadays. Filling in the cracks in his experience base.

Oh, and before anyone goes - "that's not blind RV" - Joe was generally tasked EITHER by his wife OR by a big bag of self generated targets in old school envelopes. Outside of a laboratory or the Fort Meade huts.

And if anybody ever wondered about why the unit was kept in a set of huts - well, there are good "old fashioned" spy satellites, y'know. A Russian innovation, I think. ;)

Credit where it's due.

" but I would still like to have a greater understanding of their discernment which ET group is good or bad. "

Ah. Good old fashioned stereotyping. I have seen no evidence of uniformity of attitude towards humans from any individiaul outside group. Not personally, anyway. Towards certain forms of human behaviour, maybe, but in terms of a general attitude, well, perhaps this varies by individual anyway.

Lyn Buchanan was asked to try to report on this, his approach was to divide it into four. First there was the category of hostile or non-hostile towards humans. The second dividing line was between which groups where psychic and which were not. He concluded that the non-psychic ETs generally avoid Earth because we are psychic, as a species, albeit at a very limited formal understanding of all psychic phenomena.

He also noted that groups he had identitied as "hostile psychic aliens" were extremely antipathetic to the point of "wishing us all dead".

Mind you, he also genuinely believed both the Argentine frigate event of 1962 and Rendlesham Forest in the 1980s events were of ET origin, while ignoring the limited evidence that they were actually human hoaxes for which alien incursions were a convenient excuse.

I know you have asked Farsight for their particular discernment, and I am pointing out that even for a "military insider" like Lyn Buchanan, this is not a straightforward area to come to solid conclusions in.

So, maybe it is true that some "psychic aliens" are hostile towards humans. And some are not. I am pointing out this might not be a species wise decision amongst ET races that is stuck to under all circumstances and cannot be changed.