Hello, just wanted to bring to Courtney’s attention that while watching the FARSIGHT publications and analysis of RV sessions, there appears to be, in my opinion, political preferences that alters the ability to appropriately capture the essence/crucial points of the RV sessions. Personally, as a subscriber I do not want to know who your political preference is towards - I want to feel that the information is summarized as neutral as possible. Although you have never indicated specifically, I can read between the lines, and especially during the commentary. I do not mean to be rude but I just want to point it out.

I also have a question regarding the Jeffrey Epstein revision. How come the procedures to block out the external influence was not done the first time? And are there other projects that were complete that may need to be revised due to same scenario?

Thank you,
Rose

HI Rose. About the original Epstein sessions, I made the mistake of not using the anti-blocking techniques. I did not think the Epstein thing was sufficiently important to warrant anyone trying to block it. Again, I made the mistake. It was much bigger than I originally thought. Our anti-blocking techniquest require assistance from the group who we call the Good ETs. We cannot do it by ourselves. But those ETs have a near fanatical attachment to free will, and they absolutely will not help unless we specifically request it in our procedures. So if we don't do what is needed on our side, they will not do what is necessary on their side. And I did not do what was needed on our side. My mistake.

Interesting! Ok I understand, thank you for your reply!