Just watching Kristian Harloff and how Tim Burchett etc are getting stonewalled about the US military's connection to UFOs... and I had a thought....

So, we believe that UFOs (particularly 'good ETs') are getting shot down by the US military.... no-one actually has evidence of this - because of where it happens.

And, many have said "I'll only believe when it lands on the White House lawn"...

Why not combine these two??

The 'good ETs' could send a (un-aliened) drone into White House air space, have it shot down in the public's view, and have it crash where hundreds of thousands of people will film and send virally around the planet!!!

Let's see US congress stonewall and not have public hearings then!!!! (or even just deny stuff).

Shining that already happened, not the shot down but Uap's appearing above the pentagon and the white house not to mentioned the amount of people watching and recording ufo activity is overwhelmed by now.. i believe that what is happening also is some sort of psychic manipulation within the population to make it easy to forget these events, we are already seeing that with msm news the coverup with new events that hijack more of our nervous system.
So yes to some extend what i do agree is more and more events like this to overwhelmed in such a way that the msm can't controlled the information and the intelligence can't deny to the public, by definition is the same of disclosing it.

Aha. Yes that would explain the high density of enemy drones over the white house. Because that territory is an area that symbolically would resound with everyone should a major landing were to happen. They are there to prevent it.

But it gives me an idea. Why not have a small film crew just film the white house skies, gather up a bunch of footage, then film themselves confronting everyone in the area with the footage

The ONLY way (or at least ONE of the ONLY ways) you are going to make «denials» obvious to the public as being cover-ups is if there is a LARGE number of Social-Media-Leaders or even MANY Social-Media-Channels that are LIVE-STREAMING what is going on with the White-House from MULTIPLE different angles/locations (should be possible with Drone-Technology in this day and age provided they can some-how maintain an Internet-connection) which DO manage to capture «UFO» (and Alien) activity, and, perhaps, even actual Aliens/Extra-Terrestrials themselves, showing up simultaneously or regularly... isolated footage of aliens or levitation-craft is easily dismissed as having been photo-shopped, footage from video-games, computer or A.I.-Generated, etc.

How-ever, when what's going on LIVE is being seen from MULTIPLE LIVE-Streaming Sources, ESPECIALLY when people can check and double-check the weather-reports in order to confirm that is what's going on via the Live-Streams does indeed align and correlate with the weather from sources like WeatherBug or AccuWeather or One-Weather or any other weather-checking service, and, even Satellite-Records of its Weather-Conditions are CONSISTENT with what shows up on the LIVE-Stream Footage, you CANNOT so easily «debunk» the footage as having been a «pre-recorded» video without making yourself look absolutely silly and OBVIOUSLY BLIND if you're trying to pass it off as some Chinese Spy Balloon or Swamp-Gas (particularly when technology defies KNOWN «laws» of physics).

Getting this sort of thing «set-up» is going to require some VERY GOOD co-ordination, how-ever, I have no doubts that there are going to be those forces that try to prevent or even «out-law» the live-streaming of so-called «Private Government-Property» or call you a Terrorist or claim that you are posing as some sort of security risk or insert various other things related to names like Alex Jones, etc.

Probably moments after the agreements!! who knows!!

I think we'll probably get a mass, huge sighting over several metro areas at once. But that's going to coincide with the big ET war.

the Lacerta file thing where she talks about the coming war is interesting - Preston Dennett and some other people who get abducted have been talking about similar things re earthquakes, floods, fires, all of that along with a Carrington event-like disruption of electronics. Except it's masked in talk of a pole shift, not ET's breaking humans down to enslave them.

I think mass sightings, even well documented ones, have been happening long throughout history. Recently the Miami sighting, and before the phoenix lights, there was a big one over the white house I believe in '53. But they curb it just enough, and program us with just enough fluoride stare.

One of the mysteries projects I believe had a scenario in which we fail to bring about mass disclosure. There was a description of a city like Manilla, but the air was very toxic pretty much everyone needed a mask. This to me sounds like the more likely scenario. None of the wars are quite big enough, none of the sightings are quite overwhelming enough, none of the congressional hearings are quite enough enticing. Economy and environment keep plummeting, we continue to blame humanity itself, until we just submit freely one by one to become the greys. I see it already - moving into the health care field to make ends meet, not questioning the convention publically just to stay safe, tolerating further mass surveillance and censorship.

I was recently listening to someone trying to explain to me what she believes to know about "freedom of speech" and how that has to be tempered against "hate speech" as if she learned it in some sort of philosophy class. I just politely added the slippery slope fallacy. Like someone can say "I love Al Qaeda" and how do we argue for or against it as hate speech. No, freedom of speech is freedom of speech. Everything right now is mitigated with these idiotic slippery slope arguments.

I digress. The relevance there is that catastrophic disclosure is an act of freedom of speech and the meaning of freedom of speech is just freedom of speech. It's not tempered by anything. If you want to call it tempered at all, it's tempered by lack of physical violence. It's the difference between saying you're going to punch someone instead of punching someone. It's still exercising freedom of speech, and it's tempered.

Anyhow, I don't think any of this will be done for us. More and more I am convinced that the domino that will begin any process at all will be the catastrophic disclosure brought out by the public. There will be no one coming for us . . . ever. Even, to the point, I feel like us believing that there's a fleet of ships in the solar system there to help us is damaging to our movement, even if it is true - simply because we go back to that ridiculous clinging we always do that the channeled entities have been taking advantage of. The "it's gonna happen" routine. "It's gonna happen for us, they'll do it for us, it'll happen without us, it'll happen we already started it." All - garbage.

Clearly, though, it looks like the camera thing by itself is not going to be enough to force catastrophic disclosure. There needs to be another sort of social device. There needs to be some sort of competition or reward system for those wanting to film these things. I theorize MUFON to be an insurgent. They just gather your documents, push NDAs on you, and then sit there in the dark. Don't trust these large scale entities.

I was wondering why everything about the filming has gone kind of dead since Lincoln Lounsbury's initial presentations. Something in there needs to make it more enticing.

Either way humans will have to do a lot of the heavy lifting on their planet. There will be a division between what they perceive as being their problem versus our problem, and the limit of what they came here to do. The population transfers offworld will also be a determining factor - they might be willing to contribute more resources to things that aren't immersed in earthly ways.