I think mass sightings, even well documented ones, have been happening long throughout history. Recently the Miami sighting, and before the phoenix lights, there was a big one over the white house I believe in '53. But they curb it just enough, and program us with just enough fluoride stare.
One of the mysteries projects I believe had a scenario in which we fail to bring about mass disclosure. There was a description of a city like Manilla, but the air was very toxic pretty much everyone needed a mask. This to me sounds like the more likely scenario. None of the wars are quite big enough, none of the sightings are quite overwhelming enough, none of the congressional hearings are quite enough enticing. Economy and environment keep plummeting, we continue to blame humanity itself, until we just submit freely one by one to become the greys. I see it already - moving into the health care field to make ends meet, not questioning the convention publically just to stay safe, tolerating further mass surveillance and censorship.
I was recently listening to someone trying to explain to me what she believes to know about "freedom of speech" and how that has to be tempered against "hate speech" as if she learned it in some sort of philosophy class. I just politely added the slippery slope fallacy. Like someone can say "I love Al Qaeda" and how do we argue for or against it as hate speech. No, freedom of speech is freedom of speech. Everything right now is mitigated with these idiotic slippery slope arguments.
I digress. The relevance there is that catastrophic disclosure is an act of freedom of speech and the meaning of freedom of speech is just freedom of speech. It's not tempered by anything. If you want to call it tempered at all, it's tempered by lack of physical violence. It's the difference between saying you're going to punch someone instead of punching someone. It's still exercising freedom of speech, and it's tempered.
Anyhow, I don't think any of this will be done for us. More and more I am convinced that the domino that will begin any process at all will be the catastrophic disclosure brought out by the public. There will be no one coming for us . . . ever. Even, to the point, I feel like us believing that there's a fleet of ships in the solar system there to help us is damaging to our movement, even if it is true - simply because we go back to that ridiculous clinging we always do that the channeled entities have been taking advantage of. The "it's gonna happen" routine. "It's gonna happen for us, they'll do it for us, it'll happen without us, it'll happen we already started it." All - garbage.
Clearly, though, it looks like the camera thing by itself is not going to be enough to force catastrophic disclosure. There needs to be another sort of social device. There needs to be some sort of competition or reward system for those wanting to film these things. I theorize MUFON to be an insurgent. They just gather your documents, push NDAs on you, and then sit there in the dark. Don't trust these large scale entities.
I was wondering why everything about the filming has gone kind of dead since Lincoln Lounsbury's initial presentations. Something in there needs to make it more enticing.
