Hale--Bopp

Farsight's work hurts the credibility of RV.

Empty chair Harvey.

Would it be possible to actually view Harvey if Infra-Red or Ultra-Violet Lense-Filters were used...? We already know that UFOs, what José Escamilla referred to as Critters, can be viewed and captured on film via High-Speed Shutter-Cameras with an Infra-Red Filter.

I also listened to some segment which I think may have been part of an old Art Bell episode, a caller claiming to have escaped from NASA, very frantic and sounding very worried about his life and like he was being chased as he described the Secret High-Powered Telescopes that NASA has, such that, when you view a Planet like Jupiter in the regular-spectrum, all you see is a Dead, Gaseous-Planet; how-ever, when viewing Jupiter via the Ultra-Violet Spectrum, a whole entire thriving civilisation on a planet full of vegetation can be viewed/seen through the Telescope, something that NASA is keeping Secret from the Public.

This is my basis for wondering if it is possible to view/see Harvey via some Technological-Method so that there is no need for «Special-Effects» (obviously would need to be Juxta-Positioned if this is the correct word with also being able to view Courtney Brown, Aziz Brown, who-ever else may be having Conversations with Harvey and whom-ever else, etc.), and, therefore, NOT hurt the credibility of Remote-Viewing, but, perhaps bolster it; the only reason I can think of as to why it wouldn't be done is for some sort of «Security» related reason to keep themselves out of possible or potential resulting danger for being visible or seen on a Camera for reasons that would of course obviously need to be explained in a credible-manner.

Perhaps these questions I have posited would be better-answered in a future Conversation with Harvey and Friends/Allies rather than describing it here in a Forum-Comment-Response unless a Far-Sight Personnel decides to respond here to what I had written.

"Would it be possible to actually view Harvey if Infra-Red or Ultra-Violet Lense-Filters were used...?"

My understanding of this is 'no'. Much like the way that a ghost or other spirit (or an RVer) doesn't show up. (And, this presumes that 'Harvey' is even there, and not merely in someone's head).

Alright, yes, that sounds logical; kind of like that clip where one of female the remote-viewers be like «And these aliens be like breathing down my neck and barking at me "What are you doing here!? What do you want!" and I'm like... "I don't know... I am really just here because I am trying to make some money..."»

Not like she's actually physically on their space-ship, but, space-ships (UFOs/UAPs/etc.) apparently do exist, so, how about this other option ? Does Far-Sight have access to a Telescope where their Space-Ship and/or Fleet can be viewed ? Without putting their fleet/craft in danger of course; maybe the Infra-Red and or Ultra-Violet filter(s) would still need to be used so that they can remain cloaked unless they can safely go visible; and do any of their space-craft have windows through which they can be seen and wave at us as the high-powered telescope is viewing them or would they need to remain at a distance that would be too far away to see much more than a blip in the telescope-view ?

And of course that begs many questions; obviously, much of this is contingent upon Far-Sight having access to such equipment, such as a High-Powered Telescope, for which may not necessarily be feasible for us if these telescopes are required to be the size of something like Hubble or James Webb; still, they certainly must exist as physical-beings somewhere, otherwise Phil Schneider would not have said that alien-beings can bleed and do die; then there are these Crash-Retrieval-Programmes where clearly the Pilots have been shot down and literally tortured (physically; so-called non-human biologics) so clearly they have physical-bodies which should be visible (unlike the non-physical versions of using telepathic-communication for which no scientific-instrument that I am aware of is sensitive enough to be able to detect and pick up on telepathic-communications).

I guess it would be a good idea for many of us to focus on much of our entrepreneurial-aspirations in an effort to earn and generate enough profits to help out with these Far-Sight Missions...

Not really.

One of the fundamental aspects of RV as a protocol is the necessity to a) have a designated target that b) one can get feedback on.

The latter certainly can't really be given, and the former is a huge presumption that, without the latter, would be meaningless.

Well let's say the pyramids for example, or the nazca lines. Purely verifiable baseline. Still. Nope. IRVA can't touch that one. Why, cause they keep getting ET data and reject it? How about the Paracas skulls, right there in the museum? Can't touch that one.

But again, while the 'baseline' might be verifiable, anything else ET or esoteric won't be (hence why it's called 'esoteric').

I think you want people to believe things for which there is minimal evidence, and accept it as fact. But, from what I gather, they're not ready to do that yet... at least, not until there's really good evidence to (remember, RV is supposed to be just *one* method of intelligence gathering, that supports/supplements those others... not as a stand alone).

So, personally, I appreciate that they have no interest in listing completely unverifiable targets (except as an 'interest only' thing). It's not to say they weren't right... merely that it doesn't pass muster.

Where do you get the supposed target from??