Courtney and Daz appeared in a recent episode of The Psychic Guys. Courtney again mentioned that FARSIGHT viewers use a conscious relay to prevent manipulation. I will refer to this as the ET VPN, because it sounds like a psychic, protective tunneling of perceptions. Courtney frequently calls into question the value of channeling perceptions as reliable evidence. The widely held claim about RV is that with practice, anyone can learn to do RV. Based on this recent revelation of the ET VPN, shouldn’t we also question the validity of all RV evidence?

I believe the existence of the ET VPN occurred when the Epstein sessions were redone. The excuse was something like, oops forgot to turn on the VPN when we did that project, this time we got the opposite perceptual evidemce, Epstein didn’t kill himself, just like everyone thought.

From the YouTube TPG interview transcript (starting around time 1:21:47, with imperfect AI speech to text):

Brown :
I swear guys I didn't come up with those things I they were they said do this this way and so we did it that way so with regard to the blocking stuff the reason we're not blocked and and Daz and Dick didn't know this when they were doing the Great Pyramid of Giza I have some phrases on the top of the Target that I clip out later but I have us going through the consciousness of somebody and the goody teas [good ETs] in order to get to the Target otherwise dazzer dick would not have gotten to the Great Pyramid of Giza stuff either so that's part of the Target that they were never sort of told about but when I don't use that we get blocked all the time the big remember
TPG:
the risk here that we still have a he said she said situation because now the veracity of all of the remote viewing that uses this approach to get around blocking rests on whether we can trust the entities which are psychically middle people in this how do we know that we can trust them

Courtney’s defense is that FARSIGHT is data-driven. Yes, but data is only as reliable as the instrumentation/methods/measurement apparatus that were employed in their collection. It was a very unsatisfying defense, please work on that response Courtney.

Further in the interview (1:26):
TPG:
I'm not I'm not questioning the the way remote viewing works but if the target is what some unknown entity without established trust says telepathically and not the actual thing that it's supposed to be my question is about how do we trust that middleman not does the remote viewing work I mean we know remote viewing works and can be interfered with yeah if we got somebody in between how do we establish the trust there

Brown : it's a good question part of that answer is through long experience with these beings the longer you have exposure to these beings the more you can see that they're telling you the truth

Further in the interview (1:30):
Brown:
because it it requires like any friendship it requires time it requires exposure it's not a logical thing it's not something I can say trust those people you have to have the time but I can definitely tell you you cannot try the other side and if you want proof of that they're trying to hide themselves the ships are clearly flying around with Stealth Tech and I can prove that to you with your your own camera so um I can prove the negative if you want to know that the good guys are the good guys that'll take a little bit more time
TPG:
yeah I mean we we're all aware of the the trickster entity the misleading things which kind of lur out there in psychic space so it's like how do we differentiate those things which will spin a really good yarn and tell a good story um and sometimes tell the truth how do we differentiate that from the good guys because you it doesn't have to be like really evil to be not always accurate

This “experience” reasoning feels a bit too close to an appeal to faith. I’m not from Missouri, I’m just GenX.

Why was Daz so silent in that interview? Also, Courtney was slightly sycophantic to Daz.

As a GenXer, I remember the early days of internet anonymity. Anybody could be anybody behind a quirky username. The spiritual medium of RV, whatever it is, seems more like the non-local virtual world of the internet than the local material world of out five sense reality. You can get an email from anybody anywhere and have no idea to whom you are talking. Although Courtney only specifically mentions “blocking” related to RV without the ET VPN, should we not assume that the situation is not a broader level of deception? It seems we are left to trust in CBs ability to judge the trust worthiness of the ET VPN, just asi blindly trust my VPN.

CB says an ET VPN is necessary to prevent blocking or other deception of RV perceptions. Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that FARSIGHT is always using an ET VPN from a trusted provider, now that CB has admitted the existence of the necessary protocol, after all these years. No other RVers have ever mentioned this protocol, not the military guys, nor the FFG/Dick+Daz crew whom CB kept in that dark. So, should we now conclude that, rather than the widely promoted idea that any can learn to do RV, that all RV outside of FARSIGHT is dubious data?

Its all fun and games until you experience the apocalyptic trigger for catastrophic disclosure and have to choose sides. If FARSIGHT data about Zeus being a bad Orion overlord is not 100% accurate, no biggie. If FARSIGHT ET good guy friends intentionally quicken the world into global conflagration, we would really need to trust that they are their plan is driven by good intentions.

I believe CBs first mention of the “anti-blocking” techniques occurred in the 2024-02-21 YouTube video titled “ DEATH OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN (Revised Version 2024)”. The following are excerpts from the imperfect text to speech transcript:

3:20 in transcript) Brown:
Now, these early data that we released back in 2019 show evidence of remote-viewing tampering and mental blocking. You need to see this to know what was truly going on. I originally interpreted these data as supporting the idea that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. But that original interpretationwas wrong. The reevaluation of the early data was done in early 2024, only after new data that fixed the mental blocking aspect were obtained.

37:00) Brown: Here's the thing with remote viewing. You only perceive what you look for. If you don't look for something, there is a high likelihood that you won't see it. So if any remote viewer says that they did a session and didn't see such and such, that doesn't prove that the thing was not there. If they are accurate with what they did perceive, then you can say that what they did perceive was probably at the target. But they cannot say anything about what they did not perceive unless they specifically looked for that thing and noted that it was not there.This is true for all remote viewing done by anyone, anywhere, regardless of the remote viewing methodology used.