It's important to know thyself, so let's talk about the weak spots Farsight expressed so far...

1. Vanity

Courtney obviously is susceptible to the claims that Farsight is being watched by millions of people outside of Earth. But where is the evidence of that? Harvey telling that story in a telepathic conversation at the beach is not satisfying the "data driven" approach that Courtney mentions in every intelligence briefing. In fact, it's he said she said, and Farsight "doesn't do that."

2. Hopium

➡️ https://corbettreport.com/a-brief-history-of-hopium-video/

Harvey doesn't provide evidence for what he's saying at all. The Reality of Harvey project only shows that there's a person, a security team, and some crafts above. Doesn't mean he's telling the truth. Is Farsight just hoping that it's true? Could it be a psy-op with the goal to discredit Farsight in the long run?

"Could it be a psy-op with the goal to discredit Farsight in the long run?"

Empty Chair Harvey does not help with cred.

Think about it.

Just because you cannot «see» something does not automatically make it non-existent;
Furthermore, Dr. Courtney Brown is an actual Scientist, with actual Academic-Credentials, who teaches an at actual Accredited University, who also actually does NOT take the word «proof» lightly.

Certain phenomena are most-certainly easier to «prove» than others, but, when it comes to trying to bring UFO-Related Phenomena out into the Open-Public for detailed scrutiny and attention, you are not dealing with an Earth that you can measure at any time you want-on-demand in order to determine whether it is flat or spherical or otherwise, but, are dealing with what is akin to trying to prove that Operatives from the CIA or MI6 or the Majestic-12 or Mossad or the KGB or other such people or agencies were at some particular place at some particular time, when they are very good at covering their tracks and erasing any and all evidence of their very existence or involvement with something.

They have plenty of data, they have collected the data blind, and, they even have instructional-courses on how to do what they do for yourselves; any time I read posts/threads/messages like this, I am automatically reminded of those who automatically «mantra» the «conspiracy theory» term, without even knowing the origin nor etymology of how nor when nor why it ever became a «pejorative» to begin with in the first place (Hint : It wasn't until shortly after the JFK-Incident).

Another _very common_ theme I have noticed amongst those who quickly dismissively use pejorative-labels like «Conspiracy Theorist» (pejoratively and dismissively) is that, not to get political or anything here, for, that is not my intention, but, they almost always fall into the category of a : Materialist, Liberal, Democrat, or some combination thereof, etc.; who also tend to believe everything that comes out MSM.

The «weakness» that Far-Sight has is not so much in its protocols, but, because it requires an absolutely massive amount of data to be examined before the clear-picture is formed, due to the nature of this rather elusive-subject, unlike the shape of the planet that anybody can measure with tools-and-instruments like laser-light-pens in a much shorter time-frame than is required to piece everything together for a subject like UFOs or UAPs or aliens or extra-terrestrials or some combination thereof;

I can probably also bet real-world actual money (and a LOT of it) that the «doubtful» people have listened or looked at less than half of the total number of Far-Sight movie-style publications that I have watched and reviewed; how many of you have even gone through the «Gestalts» video and followed through the session ? Dr. Courtney Brown, whilst training his son, Aziz Brown, back during those earlier days, did describe himself, that, obtaining the data is a lot like getting only various pieces of a jig-saw-puzzle, and, that each piece needed to be carefully assembled; this is why Remote-Viewing Sessions typically take a minimum of a whole entire hour to complete depending on its level-of-complexity.

Similarly, the UAP-Disclosure stuff is of very highly complex phenomena, and, because of its level-of-complexity, does require a great deal of time to absorb the often obscure pieces of data that is never covered by the main-stream in any of its main-stream-forms, before you are able to get a clearer picture of what is happening, otherwise, similarly to downloading a high-resolution image via a web-browser with a slow connection, you are definitely going to be in a «blur» like they say in Singapore : «They so "blur", lah !» until which time ALL of the data has been «downloaded» to for a clear high-res picture.

Here is one piece of the puzzle in regards to there being actual wars going on with E.T.'s
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xgNjX1NKN3o/

Here is another piece of the puzzle in regards to the factual-reality of what is called «cloaking» tech...

Ultimately, I could also say that it is not that Far-Sight is weak in its data-collection and «evidence» provided, but, that perhaps the viewers/audience-members who make such grand claims like «zero evidence» are simply weak in the department of the attention-span required to actually be able to be patient enough to put many pieces of a complicated puzzle together to see that there is validity.

Although I have yet to convert the file into a web-page format, I have a link to a chaptre on Spirit-Possession that I transcribed some years back, a phenomenon that few people in today's so-called «modern» day world even know had ever been quite thoroughly researched... I link to its link as follows from one of the sections of my web-site... https://guild.quantum-note.com/ (I still need to re-code and fix up a lot of the rest of it so don't mind any badly formatted presentations for now)

I don't disagree with you Manuel - although, your list is somewhat short.

We really should try to look at FS from the viewpoint of real interested sceptics (and definitely NOT from the viewpoint of absolute believers). We could try looking from the debunkers' perspective, but only so far (as most debunkers don't even bother to try to look at what's presented before forming their opinion and trying to debunk... there are some 'good' ones, however, who will try to look over everything before debunking...

From the viewpoint of sceptics - FS fails to convince. I've watched a number of the videos (definitely not all... 3+ hours of watching someone talk doesn't interest me). Just looking over the videos, I can see only *ONE* series that *might* be able to be corroborated by actual, real physical evidence that we *might* be able to have confirmed - that of Jeffrey Epstein's death. There is one other series that could, potentially, be proven - but it's behind a HUGE paywall ($5000) that I'm not in a position to pay for (and, I don't know how specific it is anyway!) that of the crypto pieces. (I am dismissing claims of shot down UFOs at this point in time...).

What this means is - any real sceptic coming in here and watching the videos will have a VERY hard time buying into it all.

And, you are correct in 'vanity', because CB does use words that clearly do NOT apply... "we show you everything" - well, no you don't. You show a clearly edited version of at least a second version of a session (if not a third or fourth), and we have no idea what's been said or done in between sessions.

If this was done under full scientific experiment conditions, it'd get thrown out as junk - even (especially!!) in the RV research community. ('especially', because the RV research community is trying to make it immune to the debunkers' claims of their litany of issues - contamination of data, interference, possible pre-knowledge, and the HUGE amount of bias, etc etc.) Firstly, the tasker should *never* be the judge! For that matter, the tasker should never even know or communicate with the RVers, nor the person conducting the trial, nor have absolutely anything to do with judging. Secondly, we've known for decades that tasker's beliefs about a target strongly influence the RVers data. Having FS be completely in-house means the chances of 'tasker bias' is massive... not to mention the extremely obvious bias in the judgements being made by the 'judge' at the end of each session. (as has been noted, Aziz will argue/disagree with CB's interpretation of data... that's NOT a good thing!

Sure, we can argue that it's not research, and thus doesn't need to live up to such standards.... well, that's true if you already believe, It doesn't stand up to such scrutiny when you're trying to convince sceptics.

As you said, Manuel, so far, we haven't had any 'proof' for anything that 'Harvey' has said.

Filming 'UFOs'. Sure, I agree that it's something that people should be trying/doing (although, at the moment, it's a bit expensive, and still not high enough quality - but time will change that). However, there's an issue... I've never seen any lights or orbs or shiny things that's been filmed that I'd bet my left arm on being 'alien intelligence/craft'. Equating shiny lights to aliens is not a very scientific attitude to have. UAP is the correct term, and that U is hugely important.. Far too many people are willing to 'identify' when they clearly have zero actual good evidence to do so. (and, frankly, many debunkers (and not the pejorative version) have shown how easy it is to mis-identify things for anyone to be really confident about any 'identification'). At best, all you can say is "there is something that is currently unidentified, and acting strangely (by our standards)". Calling it 'alien' or 'ET' is a HUGE leap.

I've noticed far too much (for my tastes) sensationalism in the intros and outros... and that puts me right off. Words get their meanings changed (dare I suggest FS is trying to gaslight people??) Personally, I like the way Aziz and Intysam present and discuss - very down to Earth - something that I think is essential in getting sceptics to stay around long. Over-hyping of projects (or 'successes') is far more damaging than helpful. "We now know..." - is complete and utter bullshit!

As a bit of an example of just how much I think this... I'll willingly pay my $75 to FFG every *month*, but if FS increased its price to over $100/year, I'd cancel in a heartbeat!

The methods should be improved further (this is what I am suggesting for years now):
- zero hypothesis targets / tasking bias targets (if this is all bullshit, the viewer shall perceive a pile of rotten tomatoes)
- target location on a world / star map (the map must be rotated / raster changed from target to target to keep it blind) and a close location map within the raster (two-step target localisation)
- double blind tasking (not always applicable)
- external influence scale for each session (added: at best done blind by another viewer)

If FS would do some Crypto prediction targets for free and then later reveal it under the normal subscription, they would go viral. Proof to the people that this is real. Enable self-empowerment of the audience, it will pay back a hundredfold.
As long as everything is vague, it has entertainment value only.
It is easy to predict that there will be protests at the national conventions of the parties. Same with the riots - Antifa will attack Trump, and Trump protesters will be provoked easily e.g. with a little tear gas or by some paid cops who will be beating protesters without a reason or with the help of some agents provocateurs. No RV needed in this case. Same e.g. with Jan 6th "storm" -there was a general rehearsal in Germany a couple of months before that event at the Reichstag in Germany where they tested the sceme. (The protesters even had been told that Trump has come to "save" them and to clean the swamp).

Regardless, the Ultimate-Objective is to aim for Disclosure, but, before that can happen, Millions of people around the world still need to learn the ASRV-Method, for which there are already several Episodes published (see https://www.farsightprime.com/farsight-voyager-srv-course for videos/episodes), and, Certified ASRV-Instructors who are available for Personal-Guidance (inquire for Tuition-Fees).

Also, regardless of whether it is possible to «prove» that MI6 or the KGB or the CIA or Mossad or Men-in-Black or the Majestic-12 or any other «Intel-Agencies» had been at or involved with any particular incident or location at any particular time or not, and, regardless of whether they are so-called humans or even non-humans or aliens or intra-terrestrials or extra-terrestrials (Note : that linked clip of Phil Schneider was a speech from literal decades ago), ONE thing that SHOULD be «obvious» by now is the fact that there ARE people in the world whose faces you never see and names you never hear who make decisions behind closed doors that negatively affect the rest of us all.

How would any of YOU go about «smoking them out» and «forcing them out of hiding» so that they cannot just «stay hidden and hide behind the shadows» with so-called «national-security» and «you don't have a high-level-enough security clearance» for which by the way, apparently, many former U.S. Presidents have tried to learn about what is hidden with the UAP-Phenomena, even the Clintons, only to be threatened and chased off and told just such things.

The once former U.S. President, Ronald Reagan, has also often been quoted in a number of Flat-Earther videos, although their take is that the agenda is to promote some sort of «fake» Alien-Invasion, related to Project Blue-Beam, but, when you are familiar with Far-Sight Data and Conversations with Harvey, the «Alien-Invasion» Narrative sounds a lot like some sort of psy-op or reverse-psy-op or what-ever would be the accurate term for what it would be called;

S-B here already knows that the MSM lies through their teeth about current Russian-President Vladimir Putin, aiming to do all that they can to paint him as the «most-evil villainous bad guy of all-time who far-surpasses the evils of Adolph Hitler» (or at least it seems like that's what they're trying to aim for), and, similarly, the «Alien-Invasion Threat» Narrative also sounds like a similar attempt to paint Harvey's group as Bad Guys, who will destroy and annihilate humanity if we (humans) don't get rid of them somehow (see any parallels yet ? Putin Bad, Orange Man Bad, Harvey Team Bad, all going to be causes of Nuclear-Wars and End of Humanity; come on, people, learn to be suspicious of these «narratives» and, like the Legendary Man from Valuetainment often says : «Only the paranoid survive» Patrick Bet-David).
«Out of Russia... comes the hope of the world...» -Edgar Cayce (Sleeping American-Prophet)

«Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet, I ask you, is not an alien force already among us? What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?» -Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan in his address to the United Nations General Assembly on September 21, 1987CE.

For from at least MY end, from what I am seeing and perceiving, based upon the pieces of the complex-puzzle that is available to my Paradigm-Grid, the ONLY way to END the «corruption» that exists and continues to proliferate and get even worse and worse with governments with each passing day is to essentially FORCE (or at least greatly compel) a «Disclosure» to finally blow the damn lid off of all of the «secrecy» that allows all of the Ultra-Criminals to hide behind closed doors whose faces you never see and names you never hear whom even U.S. Presidents cannot access (and I don't buy the excuse that they don't allow U.S. Presidents anywhere near places like Area 51 because the Nuclear-Radiation would kill them; why are there literally «manned» personnel there after all who can «hang around» and NOT be «killed» by the radiation ? Area 51 has been Remote-Viewed as a Project by Far-Sight by the way).

One of the ONLY «Logical» reasons (and I have factually scored in the 100th Percentile in the Logical-Reasoning section of a past I-Q Test by the way) I can think of as to WHY you would have such «Protocols» such as at Area-51 such to the point where you would SHOOT people ON-SIGHT (which has factually happened before) simply because they are passing by is because someone is trying to hide something that is absolutely ULTRA-CRIMINAL; Far-Sight Data also revealed that people do seem to exist in these such facilities, and, for the claim/excuse that I came across not long ago from someone saying that U.S. Presidents aren't allowed anywhere near such facilities for their own safety, then, how and why are there people working there at the inside and «snipers» at the out-side who don't seem to need to be concerned about being killed by radiation-poisoning ? And WHY, pray tell, would you need to effing SHOOT people to keep them AWAY from such a facility IF it were for their «safety» ? Sounds a LOT like that «narrative» excuse by corrupt cops who say that them writing you a ticket is for your «safety» when it is OBVIOUSLY for them to PROFIT from your naïvété.

The WEAKNESS of HUMANITY is that humans are apparently VERY EASY TO DECEIVE; Academia may be great at avoiding Type I Errors, but, Type II Errors seem to be largely ignored/dismissed. Example in an article titled : «How the Skeptics Lost Their Minds Over a Precognition-Experiment»

Academia is NOT «immune» to «deception» and there is a LOT that can be said about the so-called «Education» system from a variety of both highly intellectual as well as various «legendary» sources, and, I do not mean legendary as in mythical, but, legendary as in people like Patrick Bet-David of Valuetainment and well-known past-intellectuals; even in Neo-Tech literature, although most people aren't familiar with its publications (and are no longer publicly accessible in order to keep it out of the hands of corrupt people so that the corrupt couldn't use its methods to easily control people for profits), were writings about how even most university professors are actually quite worthless, but, that there did exist a handful of «notable exceptions» who weren't just «towing the line» nor «maintaining the status quo» and, what has the status-quo, and, allowing a Military Industrial Complex gotten us ?

«In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.»
-Former U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address on January 17, 1961CE.

Also: «The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.»
-Former U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address on January 17, 1961CE.

Let us not get distracted too far from our Ultimate-Goal : DISCLOSURE to END the CORRUPTION !

Well he did have some of the viewers RV the beach scene and don’t think would lie for him and discredit their work. Have always thought of empty chair like ghost adventures show and how they capture spirits sitting in chairs with SLS camera as stick figures. Did anyone see new season utah episode? They were at a brothel and put money in bed and laid down and caught the stick figure use hand for prep then get on top and grab headboard! Incredible!